Jamal Neutron

Jamal Neutron — CS2 Stats

76561198124078756[U:1:163813028]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

568Tracked matches38%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#16570 of 237949 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 29 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,432 +1,482 29 Mar28 May · 24 days played
22,55026,125peak 26,12529 Mar28 May
26,125Peak Premier in tracked matches
46Days played since 2026-03-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJamal NeutronFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning48
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48475Last 10048%Win rateLWWWLWTLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.3pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time544ms−93ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−5.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 30 Apr
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · cache, 30 Apr
375msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 29 Mar
13–1Biggest win · cache, 30 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB27141352%0.02
nukeD1441029%-0.01
mirageS128467%0.01
anubisS118373%0.02
overpassA116555%0.03
infernoB84450%0.01
ancientD72529%0.01
dust2D51420%-0.02
vertigo31233%0.02
warden1010%-0.05
train1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

232Matches
58%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
85.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3661%1.2016.6
Vertigo2348%1.2118.1
Anubis2162%1.3419.3
Dust21560%1.3918.7
Inferno1533%1.1618.5
Nuke1164%1.4013.4
Cache989%1.7619.1
Ancient786%1.3117.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
41.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.9%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
550msReaction time
25.5%T opening success
54.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
10.09HE damage / grenade
8.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.4862% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–13-0.0829%22 Sept
cache13–7-0.0118%15 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0217%14 Sept
mirage13–60.0512%14 Sept
cache3–100.1031%12 Sept
vertigo13–90.0419%5 Sept
cache15–150.1021%5 Sept
cache13–160.0121%3 Sept
anubis13–110.0719%3 Sept
cache2–110.029%1 Sept
cache7–130.0025%1 Sept
inferno10–130.048%27 Aug
vertigo12–160.0120%23 Aug
cache13–100.0615%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.0211%23 Aug
nuke12–160.0418%21 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0224%21 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0019%16 Aug
inferno2–13-0.066%21 Jul
nuke4–13-0.105%21 Jul
cache3–13-0.0610%10 Jul
anubis6–20.0012%10 Jul
inferno13–70.0421%10 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0620%6 Jul
ancient14–160.0723%5 Jul
mirage8–13-0.1017%21 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0218%30 May
overpass6–13-0.0523%28 May
dust27–13-0.057%26 May
ancient13–70.0418%24 May
nuke15–15-0.0116%21 May
ancient4–13-0.0139%21 May
overpass13–110.0827%19 May
nuke13–70.0311%19 May
overpass15–150.0619%18 May
cache9–13-0.0219%18 May
warden2–13-0.0525%18 May
train2–130.0017%17 May
cache13–3-0.0117%17 May
overpass6–130.0222%17 May
mirage13–110.045%14 May
inferno13–7-0.0213%14 May
nuke9–13-0.0215%14 May
dust213–40.0311%13 May
anubis13–9-0.0120%12 May
nuke13–100.0522%12 May
mirage10–130.0321%12 May
cache13–110.0411%12 May
anubis13–2-0.0025%12 May
nuke15–150.0818%12 May
cache13–110.0115%11 May
overpass13–70.0312%11 May
mirage13–50.0424%11 May
dust25–13-0.1216%11 May
overpass13–110.0522%11 May
cache9–13-0.013%11 May
anubis13–7-0.0112%10 May
cache6–130.0435%10 May
nuke3–13-0.079%10 May
cache13–110.0418%10 May
cache10–130.0123%9 May
anubis13–40.0310%9 May
mirage7–130.0425%8 May
overpass13–60.0519%8 May
cache7–130.0119%8 May
cache10–130.0336%5 May
cache5–13-0.0424%5 May
cache13–70.0916%5 May
mirage13–30.0212%5 May
cache13–7-0.0133%1 May
cache13–3-0.0121%1 May
cache13–40.1744%30 Apr
cache13–10.0344%30 Apr
cache13–7-0.0319%30 Apr
cache13–90.0210%29 Apr
overpass13–100.0725%17 Apr
ancient12–16-0.0217%15 Apr
nuke9–130.0418%12 Apr
overpass2–13-0.0424%12 Apr
vertigo12–120.0230%12 Apr
anubis11–130.0113%12 Apr
mirage13–30.0733%12 Apr
anubis6–130.0723%11 Apr
overpass11–13-0.057%11 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0020%6 Apr
inferno9–130.0944%6 Apr
inferno13–80.0027%4 Apr
dust210–130.0219%2 Apr
nuke13–50.0031%2 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0114%2 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0622%1 Apr
anubis13–20.0539%1 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0425%31 Mar
ancient13–70.0127%31 Mar
dust211–130.0111%30 Mar
mirage13–90.0825%30 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0217%30 Mar
anubis13–90.0324%30 Mar
inferno13–100.0123%29 Mar
overpass13–60.1525%29 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →