forbiess

forbiess — CS2 Stats

US76561198123359684[U:1:163093956]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

305Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,728Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating19,834Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#78754 of 226610 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Jun 2026 (102 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 12 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,834 +275 1 Jun8 Jun · 4 days played
19,19719,834peak 19,8341 Jun8 Jun
19,834Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-02-12

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,834
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 166 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,302), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate57.2%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy18.4%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.101.051.06above
Match win rate38.7%45.7%46.3%7.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGforbiessFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,834 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning55
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53398Last 10053%Win rateWTWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −9.1pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 721 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim9.2
Utility5.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning5.5
Utility5.2
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact6.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time581ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 11 Mar
57%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · warden, 17 May
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 23 Aug
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 26 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2291341%0.02
mirageB179853%0.02
nukeA148657%0.00
infernoA148657%-0.00
ancientA117464%0.00
anubisD62433%0.04
vertigo43175%0.01
warden32167%0.04
office32167%0.05
cache21150%-0.01
train2020%-0.04
overpass220100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

91,475Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
3,291Matches
38.7%Match win rate
57.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
18.4%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 7 players
8,052MVPs
1,397Hours (in match)
775Bombs planted
500Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,826
AWP6,340
P2503,871
MP71,597
SSG 081,355

Lifetime map wins

4,075dust2
4,074inferno
2,336nuke
501vertigo
437train
354office
100cbble
65dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

27Matches
70%Win rate
1.77Avg K/D
ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
90.5%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
581msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
12.6%Flash assists
9.95HE damage / grenade
7.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.4908% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–10-0.0328%13 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0325%13 Sept
ancient13–90.1116%13 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0227%13 Sept
cache13–110.0317%23 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0924%23 Aug
dust213–7-0.0330%22 Aug
mirage13–110.0317%8 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0011%7 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0421%7 Jun
dust27–130.0025%7 Jun
dust29–13-0.0130%4 Jun
dust210–13-0.0122%1 Jun
inferno13–30.0118%1 Jun
dust29–130.0027%1 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0331%31 May
nuke13–50.1224%26 May
inferno13–90.0721%26 May
train9–13-0.0552%17 May
warden7–130.0057%17 May
dust26–13-0.1120%17 May
inferno9–13-0.0332%16 May
ancient13–7-0.0227%16 May
mirage13–20.0532%16 May
cache12–12-0.048%16 May
inferno7–130.0127%28 Apr
dust211–13-0.0616%27 Apr
mirage13–70.0016%27 Apr
dust213–60.0218%27 Apr
ancient13–10-0.078%26 Apr
mirage13–20.0825%26 Apr
dust213–00.0017%26 Apr
dust212–120.0125%26 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0120%26 Apr
mirage11–130.0421%26 Apr
dust213–40.0721%25 Apr
mirage13–100.0123%25 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0428%25 Apr
dust213–40.0119%25 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0519%24 Apr
anubis14–160.0428%23 Apr
anubis13–50.0326%23 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0421%22 Apr
office13–110.0929%22 Apr
dust213–70.0533%21 Apr
warden13–110.0142%8 Apr
ancient13–70.0015%29 Mar
inferno13–30.0116%29 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0219%29 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0813%29 Mar
dust214–160.0320%28 Mar
overpass13–20.0513%28 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0124%27 Mar
nuke12–120.0129%24 Mar
vertigo13–4-0.0218%24 Mar
dust213–30.1033%24 Mar
nuke13–80.0634%21 Mar
ancient3–13-0.028%20 Mar
dust213–6-0.0338%20 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0321%17 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0423%17 Mar
anubis11–130.0919%15 Mar
mirage12–120.0644%15 Mar
dust210–130.0919%14 Mar
mirage11–130.0821%14 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0720%13 Mar
dust26–13-0.0132%13 Mar
dust210–130.0519%12 Mar
inferno13–40.0830%11 Mar
dust213–30.2924%11 Mar
mirage6–130.0521%11 Mar
dust25–130.0728%11 Mar
mirage13–70.0715%1 Mar
office13–70.066%1 Mar
anubis12–120.1217%1 Mar
vertigo7–130.0423%1 Mar
warden13–110.1222%28 Feb
vertigo13–20.039%28 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0517%28 Feb
nuke13–110.0524%28 Feb
nuke12–12-0.0120%25 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0322%25 Feb
office6–13-0.0146%17 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0118%16 Feb
ancient13–90.0925%16 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0413%16 Feb
inferno13–110.0224%15 Feb
mirage13–70.0925%15 Feb
ancient13–4-0.028%15 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0234%15 Feb
train10–13-0.0247%14 Feb
ancient7–130.0240%14 Feb
vertigo13–9-0.0112%14 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0016%13 Feb
dust212–12-0.0218%13 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0214%13 Feb
inferno13–80.0113%13 Feb
ancient5–130.0321%12 Feb
mirage13–70.0221%12 Feb
anubis0–13-0.0524%12 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →