GreenLi

GreenLi — CS2 Stats

NO76561198121297079[U:1:161031351]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

849Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,017Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,742Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#65887 of 230917 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,411 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 849 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 17 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,742 +3,280 20 Jul10 Sept · 22 days played
17,46222,871peak 22,87120 Jul10 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,411 +0 31 Aug10 Sept · 3 observations
1,4111,411peak 1,41131 Aug10 Sept
23,067Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,411Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-07-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,411
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 120 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,129 below peak (22,871)
  • +38 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,258 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,717), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate37.9%45.7%46.8%8.9% short
Shot accuracy17.3%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.821.051.060.24 short
Match win rate42.4%45.7%46.3%3.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGreenLiFACEITLevel 7 · 1,411 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,742 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,411csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning48
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51436Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 20

  • 6122 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility6.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning4.8
Utility6.5
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time560ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−5.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 23 Jul
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–8 · cache, 4 Aug
328msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 14 Aug
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 20 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 59% over 17mirageWeakest map · 36% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2591636%-0.00
cacheA22121055%0.02
ancientA1710759%-0.01
dust2A127558%0.00
infernoA116555%0.00
nukeA95456%-0.00
anubis42250%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

141,566Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
7,968Matches
42.4%Match win rate
37.9%Headshot %
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
18,840MVPs
4,017Hours (in match)
10,979Bombs planted
6,214Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4747,302
AWP22,176
P2505,126
Knife2,460
UMP-452,371
Tec-91,854

Lifetime map wins

7,507inferno
7,489cbble
6,464dust2
5,017train
2,771nuke
1,033vertigo
80militia
79lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,618Matches
51%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
68.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4149%0.9514.9
Ancient2654%0.7211.2
Inferno2050%0.8812.4
Dust21644%0.8814.1
Anubis1362%0.6410.3
Overpass956%0.9214.9
Nuke838%0.629.1
Vertigo757%1.0916.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
72.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
550msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
48.1%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
8.17HE damage / grenade
11.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4588% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.019%17 Aug
cache9–130.0210%16 Aug
cache7–130.0315%16 Aug
ancient13–90.0720%16 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0218%16 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0218%15 Aug
ancient13–30.0227%15 Aug
nuke6–130.0125%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0119%15 Aug
inferno6–130.0319%15 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0118%14 Aug
cache13–110.0326%14 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0124%14 Aug
dust211–13-0.046%14 Aug
mirage7–130.0216%14 Aug
mirage15–15-0.059%14 Aug
dust27–130.0215%14 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0418%13 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0315%13 Aug
inferno15–150.0021%13 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0813%13 Aug
nuke13–90.0628%13 Aug
cache12–160.0211%13 Aug
ancient13–50.0011%12 Aug
cache13–6-0.0430%12 Aug
mirage13–50.1122%12 Aug
cache13–40.1211%12 Aug
mirage13–70.0412%12 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0910%12 Aug
dust211–13-0.0311%12 Aug
cache13–80.0916%11 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0123%11 Aug
dust24–13-0.0229%11 Aug
cache13–9-0.0114%11 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0220%11 Aug
cache13–11-0.0319%11 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0316%10 Aug
mirage13–110.0124%10 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0020%10 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0019%9 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0117%5 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0712%5 Aug
mirage9–130.0220%4 Aug
ancient13–50.0115%4 Aug
cache4–13-0.0515%4 Aug
cache11–130.0116%4 Aug
cache2–80.0550%4 Aug
inferno13–110.0613%3 Aug
cache13–80.0317%3 Aug
mirage10–130.0618%3 Aug
mirage13–70.0224%3 Aug
dust213–100.0523%3 Aug
cache13–80.0223%3 Aug
mirage6–130.0112%3 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0717%3 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0319%31 Jul
inferno13–90.0015%31 Jul
dust213–80.0120%31 Jul
nuke13–90.0137%30 Jul
dust213–6-0.0111%30 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0621%30 Jul
cache13–70.0322%30 Jul
dust213–70.0027%30 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0133%30 Jul
cache15–150.0215%30 Jul
dust212–16-0.0413%24 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0411%24 Jul
ancient13–90.0824%24 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0518%23 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0216%23 Jul
mirage13–40.1427%23 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0326%23 Jul
cache13–11-0.0128%23 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0419%23 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0331%23 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0228%22 Jul
dust213–9-0.0316%22 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0121%22 Jul
cache7–130.0119%22 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0431%22 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0426%21 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0615%20 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0321%20 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0213%20 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0314%20 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0421%20 Jul
cache13–7-0.0323%20 Jul
cache8–13-0.0424%20 Jul
cache6–130.0726%20 Jul
dust213–70.0417%20 Jul
nuke9–130.0220%19 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0225%19 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0230%18 Jul
inferno13–110.1226%18 Jul
mirage10–130.0120%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0020%18 Jul
dust213–70.0830%18 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0919%18 Jul
cache13–60.0324%17 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0024%17 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →