SH0CKC0CKROACH

SH0CKC0CKROACH — CS2 Stats

76561198121137605[U:1:160871877]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,933Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPassive Rifler
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning43
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54388Last 10054%Win rateWLWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression3.7
Utility5.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.3
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time655ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 655ms
Headshot accuracy30.2%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 32.1% → last ⅓ avg 30.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — ancient 2–0
130Biggest win — italy
5Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA34191556%-0.01
ancientA1610663%0.01
anubisC135838%-0.03
nukeA127558%0.00
dust2S64267%0.01
mirage3030%0.00
vertigo32167%-0.02
boulder32167%0.07
shelter21150%-0.04
italy21150%0.02
fachwerk110100%-0.02
train110100%0.06
debris110100%-0.01
eldorado1010%-0.19
overpass1010%-0.00
sanctum1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,041Matches
54%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
76.8ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient20157%0.9814.8
Anubis15656%0.9614.3
Dust29860%1.0414.2
Nuke6255%1.1115.5
Vertigo5966%1.0015.1
Mirage5046%0.9114.4
Cache2976%1.2216.6
Overpass1974%1.3016.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.5%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
651msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
8.07HE damage / grenade
6.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2334% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache19–15-0.0319%7 Aug
mirage11–130.0271%4 Aug
vertigo13–6-0.0638%2 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0120%31 Jul
anubis13–110.0727%31 Jul
nuke13–100.0734%31 Jul
cache13–60.0328%30 Jul
cache10–130.0724%30 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0721%30 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0733%28 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0123%27 Jul
cache6–13-0.0333%27 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0431%26 Jul
cache13–50.0029%26 Jul
anubis13–110.0027%26 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0733%25 Jul
nuke13–50.0235%23 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0354%23 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0440%23 Jul
dust213–50.0325%23 Jul
ancient2–00.1429%23 Jul
ancient13–50.0328%23 Jul
nuke13–40.0035%22 Jul
shelter5–13-0.0630%22 Jul
fachwerk13–7-0.0228%22 Jul
boulder13–20.0223%22 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.0614%22 Jul
anubis13–60.0026%21 Jul
cache3–13-0.0511%21 Jul
shelter13–9-0.0135%21 Jul
vertigo13–60.0623%21 Jul
italy13–00.0737%20 Jul
boulder13–40.0832%20 Jul
train13–50.0638%20 Jul
cache5–13-0.0445%20 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0235%20 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0229%19 Jul
cache13–60.0235%19 Jul
italy8–13-0.0353%19 Jul
ancient13–110.0840%19 Jul
debris9–7-0.0139%19 Jul
eldorado3–9-0.1929%19 Jul
boulder12–120.1037%18 Jul
nuke13–110.0327%18 Jul
cache12–120.0246%18 Jul
cache13–60.0538%18 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0028%17 Jul
nuke13–40.0857%17 Jul
dust25–13-0.0833%17 Jul
cache13–60.0047%17 Jul
cache12–12-0.0729%5 Jul
cache7–13-0.0621%5 Jul
cache12–12-0.0416%5 Jul
cache13–11-0.0234%4 Jul
cache9–13-0.0820%4 Jul
nuke2–70.0242%3 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0120%3 Jul
cache9–13-0.0133%30 Jun
cache8–30.0615%30 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0231%30 Jun
dust26–13-0.0216%30 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0031%30 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0550%29 Jun
ancient13–40.0143%29 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0740%28 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0120%28 Jun
ancient1–60.0342%28 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0833%28 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0042%28 Jun
ancient3–00.0150%28 Jun
dust213–10-0.0043%25 Jun
dust213–50.0847%25 Jun
ancient11–130.0354%25 Jun
dust213–10.0330%23 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0319%23 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0419%23 Jun
cache13–40.0416%14 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0111%13 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0236%12 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0423%12 Jun
ancient13–30.0318%29 May
cache13–100.0324%29 May
nuke13–6-0.0222%29 May
anubis8–13-0.0532%29 May
ancient13–50.0013%29 May
cache13–60.0332%5 May
cache1–13-0.0728%5 May
cache13–70.0231%5 May
cache13–50.0323%5 May
cache13–3-0.0129%5 May
cache13–0-0.0526%5 May
cache12–120.0449%4 May
cache10–13-0.0529%4 May
cache13–9-0.0550%4 May
cache13–9-0.0330%4 May
cache13–110.0146%4 May
cache12–12-0.0275%4 May
cache8–130.0843%4 May
cache13–10-0.0114%4 May
sanctum7–9-0.0024%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →