Buran Sheriff

Buran Sheriff — CS2 Stats

76561198119574633[U:1:159308905]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,884Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,544 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,544 → 3,544
+5Tracked matches · now 4,884
0.0ppWin rate · 63.3% → 63.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 64 days played since 15 May 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,544 +0 30 Aug22 Sept · 4 observations
3,5443,544peak 3,54430 Aug22 Sept
3,544Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
64Days played since 2025-05-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,544
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 456 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBuran SheriffFACEITLevel 10 · 3,544 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,544csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96
Positioning61
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5941Last 10059%Win rateWWLWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +9.2pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 450ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.6
Utility5.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6
Positioning6.1
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time494ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 520ms → last ⅓ avg 494ms
Headshot accuracy29.3%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 26.7% → last ⅓ avg 29.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 20 May
69%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 12 Apr
328msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 16 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 14 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
712In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2214864%0.02
nukeA1912763%0.01
ancientB158753%0.01
infernoA148657%-0.02
dust2C114736%0.00
anubisS86275%0.04
overpassA53260%0.04
cache32167%0.03
train32167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,686Matches
52%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
83.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient55453%1.2917.7
Anubis35856%1.2817.3
Mirage34650%1.2217.5
Nuke34057%1.3417.7
Inferno17955%1.3017.7
Dust213346%1.1516.6
Overpass11552%1.2017.0
Vertigo9365%1.3917.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.6%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.8%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
492msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
7.31HE damage / grenade
6.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7076% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0031%17 Sept
nuke13–100.0339%16 Sept
ancient2–130.0213%16 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0136%16 Sept
cache16–130.0246%3 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0229%30 Aug
cache11–130.0325%30 Aug
cache13–60.0353%9 Jul
nuke11–130.0331%27 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0131%22 Jun
dust213–80.1342%22 Jun
nuke13–70.0724%22 Jun
dust213–2-0.0135%22 Jun
mirage5–130.0121%22 Jun
nuke13–80.0424%14 Jun
inferno13–50.0419%14 Jun
mirage13–70.0429%29 May
ancient8–13-0.0222%4 May
overpass7–130.010%4 May
inferno13–9-0.0126%4 May
mirage13–50.1112%22 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0230%16 Apr
nuke13–60.0426%16 Apr
inferno11–13-0.119%12 Apr
mirage13–50.0569%12 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0226%3 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0243%3 Apr
mirage13–90.0147%24 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0329%23 Mar
anubis13–100.0416%15 Mar
mirage13–90.0435%14 Mar
overpass4–130.0035%11 Mar
mirage13–100.0514%8 Mar
nuke13–80.0031%8 Mar
anubis7–130.0332%4 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0329%23 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0030%23 Feb
mirage7–130.0229%22 Feb
ancient11–130.0125%22 Feb
ancient16–140.0429%19 Feb
mirage11–130.0529%16 Feb
anubis16–140.0631%12 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0433%5 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0320%31 Jan
ancient17–190.0327%27 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0214%23 Jan
inferno6–13-0.022%23 Jan
nuke4–13-0.084%23 Jan
nuke4–13-0.080%23 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0316%23 Jan
nuke13–8-0.030%23 Jan
anubis13–100.1128%17 Jan
dust22–13-0.0320%6 Jan
dust27–13-0.0912%5 Jan
mirage11–130.0323%5 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0330%3 Jan
dust211–13-0.0329%3 Jan
nuke7–130.0733%2 Jan
inferno16–13-0.0217%30 Dec
train13–5-0.0426%30 Dec
nuke5–13-0.0324%30 Dec
nuke13–70.0425%16 Dec
mirage13–50.0320%13 Dec
ancient6–13-0.0111%28 Nov
mirage13–160.0530%27 Nov
inferno13–9-0.0415%21 Nov
dust27–13-0.0018%21 Nov
overpass13–30.0126%21 Nov
ancient16–140.0130%17 Nov
dust22–13-0.0136%14 Nov
inferno13–5-0.0341%13 Nov
inferno13–9-0.0612%8 Nov
ancient13–10-0.0223%8 Nov
train8–13-0.0229%25 Oct
overpass19–160.0932%24 Oct
ancient13–8-0.0131%24 Oct
dust213–70.1026%22 Oct
ancient13–70.0234%22 Oct
dust29–130.0216%19 Aug
ancient13–100.0322%17 Aug
ancient0–5-0.1050%15 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0131%15 Aug
dust22–13-0.0518%5 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0122%5 Aug
nuke17–190.0426%5 Aug
mirage13–110.0740%4 Aug
overpass13–100.0629%28 Jul
nuke13–110.0322%16 Jul
inferno13–60.0227%16 Jul
dust213–10.0125%14 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0023%13 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0129%13 Jul
anubis13–90.0723%13 Jun
anubis13–70.0323%8 Jun
ancient13–70.0126%7 Jun
inferno16–120.0311%31 May
anubis16–14-0.0418%31 May
train13–60.0831%23 May
ancient13–40.1530%20 May
nuke13–50.0520%15 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →