JANpacken

JANpacken — CS2 Stats

76561198119545533[U:1:159279805]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

997Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 13 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,773 -2,838 13 Feb4 Jul · 33 days played
13,53718,426peak 18,42613 Feb4 Jul
18,539Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2026-02-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJANpackenFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim41
Positioning30
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateLLWLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · +56ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim4.1
Utility4.5
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 645ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1
Positioning3.0
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time648ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 9–13 · ancient, 8 Jun
25%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 28 Aug
445msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 21 May
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 23 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 18nukeWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C25101540%-0.03
ancientB189950%-0.03
infernoS1812667%-0.03
anubisD92722%-0.04
mirageB84450%-0.01
cacheC83538%-0.05
nukeD6060%-0.04
officeA53260%-0.05
overpass3030%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

28Matches
50%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
59.3ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

17%1v1 clutch win
6%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis540%0.7413.6
Ancient560%0.9310.6
Inferno475%0.707.8
Dust22100%1.008.0
Mirage250%0.6310.0
Train10%0.6312.0
Nuke10%0.8012.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
29.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
645msReaction time
20.2%T opening success
29.1%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
7.42HE damage / grenade
5.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4242 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.238% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient2–13-0.0615%12 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0425%28 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0415%24 Aug
inferno7–13-0.1025%2 Aug
ancient7–00.046%2 Aug
cache3–13-0.0616%20 Jul
ancient13–9-0.067%20 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0224%19 Jul
cache7–13-0.0413%19 Jul
mirage16–13-0.009%12 Jul
dust27–13-0.0913%8 Jul
dust213–2-0.0225%8 Jul
dust214–16-0.0518%4 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0712%4 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0717%3 Jul
dust22–13-0.059%3 Jul
mirage12–6-0.0318%3 Jul
dust213–110.0412%2 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0110%2 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0322%21 Jun
dust213–7-0.0122%21 Jun
dust28–13-0.0122%20 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0218%20 Jun
dust25–130.0119%19 Jun
anubis6–13-0.067%19 Jun
office13–10-0.0323%15 Jun
anubis10–13-0.056%15 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0717%15 Jun
anubis7–13-0.027%13 Jun
ancient7–13-0.085%13 Jun
dust24–13-0.0211%13 Jun
dust24–13-0.0123%12 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0415%10 Jun
dust211–13-0.039%10 Jun
inferno13–90.0424%9 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0320%9 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0317%8 Jun
ancient9–130.079%8 Jun
inferno13–40.0018%8 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0623%8 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0710%8 Jun
ancient12–16-0.0313%7 Jun
mirage6–130.0315%7 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0214%7 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0715%3 Jun
inferno13–60.0113%3 Jun
dust213–7-0.0310%3 Jun
dust213–8-0.0220%3 Jun
dust213–70.0015%26 May
dust213–11-0.0912%26 May
dust213–1-0.0420%23 May
anubis7–13-0.057%21 May
ancient13–9-0.008%21 May
dust212–160.0217%21 May
dust213–11-0.0214%21 May
inferno6–13-0.0513%21 May
inferno13–40.0224%21 May
inferno14–16-0.0115%20 May
dust26–130.0020%20 May
ancient13–90.0211%16 May
inferno6–13-0.058%16 May
cache4–13-0.0615%10 May
cache13–10-0.0213%10 May
cache0–13-0.124%6 May
cache13–11-0.056%2 May
cache13–50.0311%2 May
cache10–13-0.0814%28 Apr
nuke1–13-0.0613%3 Apr
dust25–13-0.0524%2 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0912%2 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0021%28 Mar
dust27–13-0.089%28 Mar
office13–9-0.0923%27 Mar
dust24–13-0.0416%15 Mar
inferno13–11-0.067%15 Mar
office1–13-0.150%14 Mar
office13–20.0311%14 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0521%13 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0419%13 Mar
ancient13–8-0.078%13 Mar
mirage13–10-0.084%13 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0213%9 Mar
mirage6–130.0117%9 Mar
dust211–13-0.049%8 Mar
anubis15–15-0.0312%8 Mar
inferno13–5-0.073%8 Mar
ancient2–13-0.078%28 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0217%28 Feb
overpass9–13-0.0217%24 Feb
ancient13–80.0611%24 Feb
office2–90.0224%24 Feb
dust28–13-0.0417%20 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0319%16 Feb
mirage13–80.0421%16 Feb
inferno16–140.0214%16 Feb
ancient8–13-0.094%16 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0213%15 Feb
inferno13–16-0.0318%14 Feb
dust213–10-0.0418%13 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0615%13 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →