Akimboks

Akimboks — CS2 Stats

76561198118164335[U:1:157898607]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,989Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,570Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating23,700Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31812 of 227315 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,624 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 23,700 → 23,700
0Faceit ELO · 1,624 → 1,624
+1Tracked matches · now 1,989
+3.3ppWin rate · 63.3% → 66.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 4 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,700 +1,060 4 Aug8 Sept · 18 days played
21,81123,812peak 23,8124 Aug8 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,624 +0 30 Aug8 Sept · 4 observations
1,6241,624peak 1,62430 Aug8 Sept
23,812Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,624Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,624
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 127 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 112 below peak (23,812)
  • +1,215 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,300 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate54.9%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy8.4%13.0%13.2%4.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.351.061.07above
Match win rate42.4%46.3%46.9%4.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAkimboksFACEITLevel 8 · 1,624 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,700 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,624csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning64
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53452Last 10053%Win rateWLWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 155 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.3
Utility6.5
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning6.4
Utility6.5
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time532ms−109ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–9 · cache, 26 Aug
35%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 15 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · dust2, 23 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 21 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
1411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 13nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A30181260%0.03
mirageB26141254%0.02
cacheB178947%0.01
infernoA138562%0.02
nukeD51420%-0.03
ancient42250%0.04
vertigo31233%0.04
anubis21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

121,150Lifetime kills
1.35K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
3,881Matches
42.4%Match win rate
54.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
8.4%Shot accuracy
9,245MVPs
1,563Hours (in match)
4,227Bombs planted
1,839Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4763,800
AWP6,723
P901,971
MP91,951
FAMAS1,707

Lifetime map wins

12,846dust2
4,414inferno
2,064nuke
1,230vertigo
605train
92office
66dust
57lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

806Matches
51%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
87.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust215157%1.3417.8
Inferno11350%1.3417.8
Mirage9246%1.2817.5
Ancient7749%1.3218.5
Anubis3741%1.1617.3
Overpass3554%1.3217.4
Vertigo2442%1.4318.0
Nuke1958%1.2718.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
533msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
57.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
8.01HE damage / grenade
15.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.64% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.0919%18 Sept
cache16–19-0.0019%2 Sept
mirage13–100.0510%1 Sept
dust213–90.0210%1 Sept
dust211–130.0412%31 Aug
cache13–11-0.0013%30 Aug
anubis13–100.0514%30 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0110%30 Aug
dust213–11-0.0113%30 Aug
cache2–13-0.0314%30 Aug
mirage16–120.0613%30 Aug
inferno13–100.0617%30 Aug
mirage13–100.0212%30 Aug
inferno5–130.0022%29 Aug
dust213–90.0314%29 Aug
cache13–60.0226%28 Aug
dust213–90.0216%27 Aug
vertigo7–130.0118%27 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0315%26 Aug
cache13–90.1630%26 Aug
inferno16–140.0525%26 Aug
mirage13–70.047%24 Aug
dust27–130.0318%24 Aug
inferno9–130.0422%24 Aug
dust213–40.0813%24 Aug
dust27–130.0221%24 Aug
mirage13–20.1215%23 Aug
cache13–11-0.0115%23 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0014%23 Aug
dust211–130.0115%23 Aug
mirage11–130.0421%23 Aug
dust213–50.0310%23 Aug
cache14–160.0220%22 Aug
dust219–160.0322%22 Aug
mirage13–20.0626%22 Aug
dust213–11-0.0612%22 Aug
inferno9–130.0021%22 Aug
cache7–13-0.019%22 Aug
ancient13–00.1419%21 Aug
mirage11–130.0722%21 Aug
mirage13–110.1422%20 Aug
nuke13–70.0224%19 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0121%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0114%19 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0313%19 Aug
dust211–130.0613%19 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0120%17 Aug
dust213–110.0521%16 Aug
mirage13–80.0519%16 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0510%16 Aug
cache11–13-0.0320%16 Aug
cache13–90.068%16 Aug
inferno13–40.0516%16 Aug
dust20–13-0.0914%16 Aug
dust213–60.0316%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0521%16 Aug
dust213–80.0013%16 Aug
ancient13–60.0815%15 Aug
dust24–130.0435%15 Aug
inferno3–13-0.1015%15 Aug
cache3–130.0226%15 Aug
mirage8–130.0016%15 Aug
dust213–100.0023%15 Aug
vertigo8–130.0315%12 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0314%12 Aug
dust213–90.0814%12 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0317%11 Aug
inferno16–140.0824%11 Aug
cache13–100.0417%10 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0710%10 Aug
dust28–130.0512%10 Aug
mirage16–120.0225%9 Aug
cache16–130.0612%9 Aug
inferno13–110.0426%9 Aug
dust214–160.0920%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0121%9 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0318%9 Aug
dust213–80.0521%9 Aug
cache13–100.0326%9 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0123%9 Aug
cache13–16-0.0215%9 Aug
mirage8–130.0319%9 Aug
dust211–130.0615%9 Aug
inferno13–90.0521%9 Aug
dust213–80.0123%9 Aug
cache9–13-0.0718%8 Aug
mirage1–130.0314%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0220%7 Aug
vertigo13–110.0716%7 Aug
dust213–11-0.0111%7 Aug
dust25–13-0.0120%6 Aug
cache2–13-0.0115%6 Aug
dust215–150.0416%5 Aug
mirage13–110.0530%5 Aug
inferno16–140.0418%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0419%5 Aug
inferno13–160.0123%4 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0424%4 Aug
dust213–50.0134%4 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0414%4 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →