Vandskabning

Vandskabning — CS2 Stats

NP76561198117617208[U:1:157351480]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

230Tracked matches38%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Oct 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 230
0.0ppWin rate · 37.9% → 37.9%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,999 -5,641 2 Feb – 19 Oct · 35 days played
9,99915,920peak 15,9202 Feb19 Oct
15,920Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-02-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVandskabningFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning60
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD36–55–9Last 10036%Win rateLWLWTLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Last 20

  • 5–13–2 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 671ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility5.8
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 660ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.0
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time655ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 655ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 6 Apr →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · vertigo, 16 May →
375msFastest reaction time · 4–1 · mirage, 9 Mar →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 5 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
2–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 46% over 13infernoWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC239–1439%0.01
mirageC238–1535%0.02
infernoD186–1233%-0.01
vertigoB136–746%0.05
ancientC114–736%0.01
dust2D62–433%-0.01
overpass—31–233%0.07
anubis—20–20%-0.04
sanctum—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

60Matches
55%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
84.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
38%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1844%1.0615.9
Ancient1242%1.0916.5
Inferno978%1.6021.0
Nuke850%1.2622.0
Dust2875%1.0313.9
Overpass367%1.3419.3
Train10%0.508.0
Anubis1100%1.0010.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
660msReaction time
39.3%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
8.37HE damage / grenade
13.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2922% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.0511%7 Nov →
nuke11–10.0015%6 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.0429%6 Jun →
inferno13–40.0223%6 Jun →
vertigo8–80.1546%16 May →
nuke11–130.0112%14 Apr →
mirage4–130.0019%13 Apr →
mirage10–130.0217%13 Apr →
inferno9–20.0314%6 Apr →
mirage13–40.2233%6 Apr →
mirage15–15-0.0510%5 Apr →
nuke8–130.0931%5 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0717%28 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.080%28 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0311%27 Mar →
inferno3–130.0317%27 Mar →
vertigo13–90.1726%27 Mar →
nuke11–130.0115%27 Mar →
nuke7–130.0138%25 Mar →
vertigo9–30.1613%25 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0223%25 Mar →
nuke13–7-0.0423%24 Mar →
nuke0–9-0.0431%22 Mar →
mirage13–90.0526%22 Mar →
ancient13–70.0419%22 Mar →
vertigo7–9-0.0719%21 Mar →
inferno13–10-0.0411%21 Mar →
mirage13–110.0527%21 Mar →
nuke10–130.0422%20 Mar →
nuke13–8-0.053%19 Mar →
vertigo9–50.0914%18 Mar →
inferno5–9-0.2122%18 Mar →
nuke13–50.1229%18 Mar →
mirage11–130.0515%17 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0215%12 Mar →
mirage1–13-0.009%10 Mar →
mirage4–10.0725%9 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.078%8 Mar →
inferno7–90.0229%5 Mar →
mirage13–20.1121%5 Mar →
ancient6–130.0420%4 Mar →
dust213–9-0.0222%3 Mar →
ancient15–150.0113%3 Mar →
inferno4–90.0821%2 Mar →
nuke3–9-0.1543%2 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0420%26 Feb →
vertigo4–9-0.0515%26 Feb →
mirage7–130.0318%25 Feb →
vertigo8–80.0040%24 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0023%22 Feb →
ancient8–130.0113%22 Feb →
nuke13–50.0228%22 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0318%21 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0415%20 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0615%20 Feb →
overpass8–80.1323%20 Feb →
inferno13–60.0526%17 Feb →
vertigo9–50.0311%17 Feb →
nuke13–40.0612%15 Feb →
overpass13–80.0421%15 Feb →
inferno10–130.0321%15 Feb →
mirage5–130.0321%15 Feb →
sanctum7–9-0.0315%15 Feb →
nuke8–8-0.0518%15 Feb →
vertigo5–9-0.058%15 Feb →
inferno1–13-0.1214%14 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.0519%14 Feb →
inferno9–20.1020%14 Feb →
vertigo5–90.0129%14 Feb →
ancient13–20.0516%11 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0413%11 Feb →
mirage13–60.0724%11 Feb →
ancient8–130.0529%11 Feb →
mirage5–100.0337%11 Feb →
mirage13–50.0621%11 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0415%10 Feb →
nuke13–110.036%10 Feb →
nuke8–80.1023%10 Feb →
vertigo8–8-0.0311%10 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0441%9 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0321%9 Feb →
vertigo9–30.0931%9 Feb →
vertigo9–50.1417%9 Feb →
inferno3–9-0.0915%9 Feb →
nuke9–130.0518%6 Feb →
ancient13–9-0.0122%6 Feb →
dust26–130.0616%6 Feb →
overpass8–130.0425%6 Feb →
nuke13–50.0719%6 Feb →
inferno8–80.0515%6 Feb →
mirage13–80.0024%6 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.0314%4 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0317%4 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0415%4 Feb →
inferno13–80.0222%3 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0114%3 Feb →
ancient13–100.0616%2 Feb →
nuke13–40.0320%2 Feb →
dust24–13-0.0017%2 Feb →
inferno12–16-0.0524%2 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.