seekir

seekir — CS2 Stats

AF76561198117011602[U:1:156745874]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

80Tracked matches61%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating13,081Blue band · top ~38.6% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,081 +417 28 Oct – 29 Oct · 2 days played
12,66413,081peak 13,08128 Oct29 Oct
13,081Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-18

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 13,081
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,919 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGseekirPREMIER13,081 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning76
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–26–6Last 8060%Win rateWWLLLWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 80 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.6
Utility7.4
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels5.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning7.6
Utility7.4
Mechanics9.1
Opening Duels7.2
Win Impact8.6

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.06
Reaction time571ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 80 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 9 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · shelter, 10 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · inferno, 22 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 12 Oct →

Across the last 80 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 27mirageWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3822–1658%0.05
infernoA2717–1063%0.08
mirageC52–340%0.04
nuke—32–167%0.03
office—32–167%-0.04
ancient—11–0100%0.16
anubis—11–0100%0.02
shelter—10–10%0.02
boulder—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 80 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
90.8%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
576msReaction time
54.3%T opening success
63.2%CT opening success
0.80Enemies flashed / flash
12.8%Flash assists
11.58HE damage / grenade
13.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–8-0.0326%29 Oct →
dust213–90.0825%28 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0118%28 Oct →
nuke8–130.1230%21 Oct →
dust211–130.0124%21 Oct →
dust213–90.0616%20 Oct →
mirage13–70.0621%20 Oct →
inferno13–50.0835%20 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0123%19 Oct →
dust211–130.0510%19 Oct →
mirage4–130.0935%17 Oct →
inferno5–130.0519%17 Oct →
dust211–130.0617%17 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0623%17 Oct →
dust213–60.1319%15 Oct →
ancient13–20.1619%15 Oct →
mirage8–130.0417%15 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0115%14 Oct →
mirage13–40.0321%14 Oct →
dust213–80.0616%13 Oct →
dust213–80.0827%13 Oct →
inferno5–90.0817%13 Oct →
inferno13–10.1219%12 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0119%5 Oct →
inferno9–10.2319%5 Oct →
dust213–80.1415%4 Oct →
mirage2–130.0028%4 Oct →
dust213–100.0818%29 Sept →
dust210–130.0210%29 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.0136%28 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0225%28 Sept →
dust23–130.029%16 Sept →
anubis13–100.0219%16 Sept →
inferno9–20.2818%10 Sept →
inferno9–40.0813%10 Sept →
inferno9–10.2012%10 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0312%10 Sept →
shelter2–130.0250%10 Sept →
dust213–50.0528%10 Sept →
boulder13–6-0.0220%10 Sept →
dust22–8-0.0125%10 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0721%9 Sept →
inferno9–20.2832%9 Sept →
dust213–70.0325%9 Sept →
dust213–50.0818%8 Sept →
dust212–120.1020%8 Sept →
dust213–110.1420%7 Sept →
inferno6–90.1128%7 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0426%7 Sept →
inferno9–40.1833%7 Sept →
dust20–8-0.0744%3 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.2914%3 Sept →
office13–1-0.0225%3 Sept →
office0–13-0.0724%2 Sept →
office13–5-0.0423%2 Sept →
dust213–60.1126%28 Aug →
dust213–10.0831%27 Aug →
dust213–30.1028%27 Aug →
dust213–50.0517%27 Aug →
dust213–110.0727%27 Aug →
dust26–130.0637%26 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0025%26 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.1222%26 Aug →
inferno9–70.1115%22 Aug →
inferno9–40.1425%22 Aug →
inferno7–90.0316%22 Aug →
inferno9–10.1633%21 Aug →
dust212–120.0327%21 Aug →
dust213–70.0627%21 Aug →
dust213–100.0930%20 Aug →
dust23–130.0316%20 Aug →
dust213–80.0622%19 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0111%19 Aug →
inferno6–90.0527%19 Aug →
inferno9–1-0.0513%19 Aug →
inferno9–50.1625%19 Aug →
inferno9–40.1625%19 Aug →
inferno9–50.0523%19 Aug →
inferno9–10.2134%19 Aug →
dust213–50.1425%18 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.