TaZyX

TaZyX — CS2 Stats

DE76561198111608749[U:1:151343021]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

948Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,569Top 25% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#46557 of 247877 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,569 +2,685 12 Jul – 26 Sept · 28 days played
19,44723,691peak 23,69112 Jul26 Sept
23,803Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-07-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,122 below peak (23,691)
  • +1,719 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,685 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,431 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTaZyXFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER22,569 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning56
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLLWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.5

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time507ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 507ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–9 · inferno, 27 Aug →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · mirage, 6 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · cache, 25 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 20 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA1811–761%0.02
cacheA1710–759%0.03
ancientA148–657%0.02
mirageB115–645%0.01
nukeD93–633%-0.03
anubisD82–625%-0.01
dust2D82–625%-0.02
officeD62–433%-0.01
vertigo—32–167%0.03
fachwerk—22–0100%0.01
shelter—20–20%0.01
boulder—21–150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

39Matches
59%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
—ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1100%1.8524.0
Ancient1100%1.5614.0
Overpass1100%1.3121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
507msReaction time
46.4%T opening success
37.9%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
11.63HE damage / grenade
4.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4558 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.8658% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–13-0.0328%26 Sept →
ancient9–130.0420%26 Sept →
inferno13–100.0321%26 Sept →
cache13–80.0518%25 Sept →
inferno13–70.0529%25 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0223%25 Sept →
mirage3–130.0112%24 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0928%24 Sept →
mirage8–130.0616%24 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0316%23 Sept →
inferno13–100.0314%23 Sept →
mirage13–110.0520%23 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0327%23 Sept →
ancient13–100.0222%22 Sept →
inferno13–80.0221%21 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0430%21 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0125%21 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.0113%20 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0417%20 Sept →
inferno13–00.0522%20 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0127%14 Sept →
cache13–00.1131%14 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0510%13 Sept →
office5–130.0321%7 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0734%6 Sept →
dust29–130.0125%6 Sept →
inferno13–40.0728%6 Sept →
office13–6-0.0122%6 Sept →
office5–13-0.0627%6 Sept →
office13–50.0221%5 Sept →
office10–130.0427%5 Sept →
mirage13–80.0722%5 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0115%5 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0211%5 Sept →
cache13–80.0633%3 Sept →
ancient13–80.0219%3 Sept →
inferno9–130.0112%3 Sept →
ancient13–50.1129%3 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0819%27 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0225%27 Aug →
inferno13–90.1219%27 Aug →
office7–13-0.0733%24 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0723%18 Aug →
cache13–10.1116%12 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0220%10 Aug →
fachwerk13–70.0418%4 Aug →
shelter7–130.0118%4 Aug →
boulder2–130.0018%4 Aug →
vertigo13–90.0520%4 Aug →
vertigo13–110.0129%4 Aug →
fachwerk13–9-0.0217%4 Aug →
boulder13–10.0226%3 Aug →
shelter10–130.0122%3 Aug →
ancient13–80.0233%2 Aug →
mirage11–130.0414%1 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0122%1 Aug →
dust213–30.0623%1 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0314%31 Jul →
inferno16–130.0215%31 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0322%30 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0821%30 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0422%29 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0324%29 Jul →
anubis13–110.0220%29 Jul →
vertigo6–130.0319%29 Jul →
ancient13–70.0522%29 Jul →
cache11–30.1225%28 Jul →
nuke16–120.009%28 Jul →
inferno13–50.0028%28 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.027%25 Jul →
cache9–130.0430%25 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0513%25 Jul →
nuke6–130.0316%22 Jul →
cache13–50.1223%22 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0226%22 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0915%22 Jul →
ancient13–90.0524%20 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0014%17 Jul →
nuke13–80.0114%17 Jul →
cache13–10-0.036%16 Jul →
ancient13–3-0.0416%16 Jul →
cache12–120.0019%16 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0316%16 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0214%15 Jul →
cache13–80.0827%15 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0617%14 Jul →
cache13–10.0312%14 Jul →
cache8–130.0110%14 Jul →
mirage11–10.0524%14 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0131%14 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0319%14 Jul →
cache13–80.0222%14 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0011%13 Jul →
inferno12–160.0817%13 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0316%13 Jul →
ancient8–130.0412%13 Jul →
ancient6–130.0122%12 Jul →
ancient13–70.0422%12 Jul →
nuke3–130.0031%12 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.0114%12 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.