jimpan

jimpan — CS2 Stats

SE76561198109962368[U:1:149696640]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

815Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,272Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61859 of 240860 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 27 Jun 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,272 +2,326 27 Aug22 Sept · 11 days played
18,94621,753peak 21,75327 Aug22 Sept
21,753Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2025-06-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 481 below peak (21,753)
  • +2,326 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,728 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjimpanFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,272 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning62
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateTLLWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.0
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time545ms−93ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–11 · dust2, 4 Aug
67%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 30 Mar
313msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · mirage, 30 Mar
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 56% over 16infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24131154%0.01
dust2B24121250%0.00
nukeA169756%0.00
ancientD134931%-0.00
cacheA116555%0.02
infernoD72529%0.01
overpass3030%-0.04
anubis220100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,212Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
74.9ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4553%0.9614.8
Ancient3171%1.0817.6
Dust22635%1.1115.0
Inferno2143%0.8812.0
Nuke1573%1.1915.9
Anubis1540%1.0115.6
Vertigo933%0.9413.9
Train3100%1.1814.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
541msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
54.8%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
9.76HE damage / grenade
10.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.474 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.7254% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass12–12-0.0624%23 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0419%22 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0222%22 Sept
dust213–110.0822%22 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0521%22 Sept
anubis13–40.0323%22 Sept
inferno13–80.0420%22 Sept
mirage10–130.0117%22 Sept
mirage12–10.0519%20 Sept
cache11–13-0.0114%20 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0322%20 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0722%20 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0116%18 Sept
cache13–11-0.0320%18 Sept
inferno6–13-0.027%18 Sept
cache13–60.0619%18 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0313%18 Sept
anubis13–100.0918%18 Sept
cache6–13-0.0317%18 Sept
ancient8–130.0129%17 Sept
dust213–6-0.0226%17 Sept
mirage13–70.0517%17 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0324%17 Sept
nuke13–100.0615%16 Sept
cache13–50.0622%16 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0422%16 Sept
cache13–50.0731%15 Sept
cache7–13-0.0329%15 Sept
dust29–13-0.0324%12 Sept
cache9–130.0110%12 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0114%12 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0023%11 Sept
dust24–13-0.0322%11 Sept
cache13–40.0819%11 Sept
nuke13–10.0838%11 Sept
dust211–130.0226%11 Sept
mirage13–50.1227%11 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0428%11 Sept
mirage15–150.0318%6 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0416%6 Sept
inferno5–20.0518%6 Sept
ancient14–160.0421%6 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0133%29 Aug
dust210–13-0.0414%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.0115%29 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0015%29 Aug
mirage13–110.0617%29 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0321%27 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0138%27 Aug
nuke11–130.0019%27 Aug
ancient13–80.0423%27 Aug
inferno11–130.0224%27 Aug
nuke13–30.0431%27 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0123%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0330%26 Aug
cache16–130.0216%26 Aug
inferno11–130.0632%26 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0014%25 Aug
nuke13–50.0122%25 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0226%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.0722%25 Aug
dust213–2-0.0122%25 Aug
dust213–110.1319%4 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0017%4 Aug
dust213–90.0616%2 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0010%2 Aug
ancient11–130.0024%2 Aug
mirage13–80.0519%15 Jun
dust213–100.0228%14 Jun
dust213–110.0115%14 Jun
ancient7–130.0113%14 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0615%14 Jun
nuke13–10.0329%14 Jun
dust213–8-0.0323%1 Jun
dust27–130.0531%1 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0734%31 May
nuke8–130.017%31 May
ancient5–130.0319%31 May
overpass13–16-0.039%31 May
mirage5–13-0.0814%31 May
dust213–5-0.0019%3 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0967%30 Mar
mirage12–120.0434%6 Mar
dust27–130.0518%6 Mar
mirage13–20.1024%20 Feb
dust213–3-0.0425%19 Feb
dust27–4-0.0322%15 Feb
mirage1–130.0227%15 Feb
dust29–13-0.099%15 Feb
dust213–100.1031%13 Feb
dust29–13-0.0218%11 Oct
ancient3–13-0.1010%15 Sept
mirage13–110.0212%30 Aug
overpass10–13-0.0324%30 Aug
ancient13–90.0319%30 Aug
nuke13–70.0516%30 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0216%30 Aug
mirage13–70.0421%27 Jun
dust24–130.0529%27 Jun
dust210–13-0.0221%27 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →