DiogoKPP

DiogoKPP — CS2 Stats

CH76561198107764088[U:1:147498360]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,132Tracked matches46%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,174Purple band · top ~27.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 30 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,174 -4,350 30 Aug19 Sept · 18 days played
14,89519,524peak 19,52430 Aug19 Sept
19,837Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,350 below peak (19,524)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,826 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDiogoKPPFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER15,174 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning57
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD35596Last 10035%Win rateLLLLTWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 7103 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.2
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.7
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact3.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time570ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 11 Sept
53%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · inferno, 14 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 8–11 · inferno, 16 Sept
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 18 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 18infernoWeakest map · 12% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC25101540%-0.01
dust2B189950%0.00
infernoD1721512%-0.04
cacheC1661038%-0.00
anubisC135838%-0.01
mirageD72529%-0.02
overpass2020%-0.03
nuke1010%-0.04
poseidon110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (12% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
52%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
75.9ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21856%1.0117.9
Ancient1540%0.8413.1
Cache1450%0.8912.2
Inferno956%0.9413.3
Mirage956%0.8314.3
Anubis650%0.9716.7
Vertigo1100%1.6423.0
Nuke1100%1.7017.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
28.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
574msReaction time
63.8%T opening success
37.7%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
11.7%Flash assists
10.95HE damage / grenade
4.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.7304% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

12% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–13-0.0729%20 Sept
dust23–13-0.0621%19 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0510%19 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0621%19 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0322%19 Sept
anubis13–70.0422%19 Sept
dust210–13-0.0322%19 Sept
ancient13–50.0722%19 Sept
dust213–110.0131%19 Sept
dust23–13-0.0318%19 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0322%18 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0218%18 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0227%18 Sept
inferno15–150.0417%18 Sept
dust27–130.0521%18 Sept
dust28–130.0123%18 Sept
inferno5–13-0.1022%18 Sept
anubis13–30.0428%18 Sept
ancient13–40.0423%18 Sept
dust213–50.0738%18 Sept
dust213–10-0.0131%17 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0619%17 Sept
cache13–11-0.0129%17 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0222%17 Sept
ancient13–40.024%17 Sept
inferno0–10-0.0823%17 Sept
inferno8–11-0.0226%16 Sept
anubis12–16-0.0118%16 Sept
ancient8–130.026%16 Sept
cache13–60.0936%16 Sept
dust27–13-0.0322%16 Sept
dust213–10-0.0013%14 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0220%14 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0253%14 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0522%14 Sept
dust213–110.0226%14 Sept
cache3–13-0.0644%14 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0816%14 Sept
cache9–130.0123%14 Sept
dust213–90.0436%14 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0314%14 Sept
dust213–11-0.0116%13 Sept
ancient13–80.0135%12 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0519%12 Sept
dust218–22-0.0323%12 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0317%12 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0424%11 Sept
dust213–50.1035%11 Sept
anubis6–130.0223%11 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0216%11 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0715%11 Sept
cache13–7-0.0126%11 Sept
ancient0–13-0.0925%10 Sept
overpass10–13-0.0424%10 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0412%9 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0420%9 Sept
cache13–8-0.0417%9 Sept
cache8–13-0.0241%9 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0517%9 Sept
mirage16–130.0327%8 Sept
cache12–16-0.0125%7 Sept
cache13–7-0.0136%7 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0310%7 Sept
cache3–13-0.0121%7 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0018%7 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0621%7 Sept
cache9–130.0818%6 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0323%6 Sept
ancient4–130.0418%6 Sept
dust213–8-0.0429%6 Sept
ancient10–130.0336%6 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0116%6 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0622%5 Sept
ancient14–160.0422%5 Sept
anubis5–13-0.018%5 Sept
cache10–130.0129%5 Sept
dust211–13-0.0126%5 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0315%5 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0615%5 Sept
cache6–13-0.0318%5 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0218%4 Sept
dust22–13-0.0219%4 Sept
anubis13–110.0723%4 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0122%4 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0426%4 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0416%3 Sept
cache3–13-0.0030%3 Sept
cache13–9-0.0221%3 Sept
cache10–13-0.0420%2 Sept
ancient13–90.0127%2 Sept
overpass8–8-0.0230%2 Sept
poseidon9–6-0.0627%2 Sept
ancient1–13-0.1025%1 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0244%1 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0321%1 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0318%31 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0421%31 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0116%31 Aug
mirage10–130.0123%30 Aug
anubis7–130.0324%30 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →