emile

emile — CS2 Stats

FR76561198105859192[U:1:145593464]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,072Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,072 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 20 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,408 +2,409 26 May29 Jun · 8 days played
24,87827,408peak 27,40826 May29 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,576 +0 27 Aug7 Sept · 5 observations
2,5762,576peak 2,57627 Aug7 Sept
27,408Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,576Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-05-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,576
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 424 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGemilePEAK ELO2,576csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning62
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6040Last 10060%Win rateWLWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility4.1
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning6.2
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time538ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy25.7%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 25.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 9 Jun
47%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · ancient, 24 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · dust2, 28 May
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 20 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 21anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA37231462%0.02
ancientS2114767%0.01
dust2A1912763%0.03
anubisC135838%0.00
inferno330100%0.02
overpass32167%0.03
nuke31233%-0.01
cache1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,952Matches
53%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
88.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage39255%1.2518.9
Dust218648%1.2319.1
Ancient14554%1.2217.4
Anubis12845%1.2417.9
Inferno3647%1.2518.9
Nuke3650%1.1717.1
Overpass2148%1.1517.9
Vertigo2167%1.2918.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
87.9%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
530msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
52.1%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
10.2%Flash assists
8.07HE damage / grenade
4.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7384% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–80.0837%27 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0131%24 Aug
anubis13–110.0524%24 Aug
inferno13–10.0518%20 Aug
mirage14–160.0834%19 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0634%16 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0230%16 Aug
anubis13–80.0222%15 Aug
anubis8–130.0222%9 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0216%6 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0417%4 Aug
cache4–13-0.104%30 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0324%30 Jul
dust28–13-0.0728%29 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0330%28 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0347%24 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0929%24 Jul
dust219–16-0.0114%23 Jul
mirage13–70.0625%16 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0115%16 Jul
mirage4–130.0220%16 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0229%16 Jul
ancient5–130.1042%11 Jul
mirage7–130.0217%10 Jul
mirage10–130.0730%10 Jul
anubis13–90.0222%9 Jul
mirage13–70.0423%7 Jul
ancient8–130.0211%5 Jul
ancient13–80.0423%4 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0426%4 Jul
mirage13–30.0727%29 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0134%29 Jun
dust213–50.0741%29 Jun
mirage16–130.0426%27 Jun
ancient13–110.0327%27 Jun
overpass13–110.0420%25 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0124%23 Jun
mirage13–70.0321%23 Jun
dust28–130.0020%18 Jun
mirage4–1-0.0510%16 Jun
dust213–90.0325%11 Jun
nuke7–130.0628%11 Jun
dust24–130.0315%11 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0326%10 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0317%10 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0329%9 Jun
dust213–60.1221%9 Jun
inferno13–50.0629%9 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0714%8 Jun
dust27–13-0.0625%7 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0128%7 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0336%3 Jun
dust213–60.0620%3 Jun
overpass9–130.0528%3 Jun
ancient13–90.0625%2 Jun
mirage13–80.0137%1 Jun
dust210–130.0226%1 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0113%31 May
mirage13–50.0313%31 May
mirage5–13-0.0911%30 May
mirage5–13-0.0227%30 May
dust211–130.0122%30 May
mirage13–40.0825%30 May
dust213–40.0419%30 May
ancient13–20.0420%30 May
dust213–6-0.0220%30 May
mirage13–80.1127%30 May
ancient13–100.0934%29 May
mirage9–130.0516%29 May
dust213–60.0623%29 May
ancient19–150.0224%29 May
mirage13–110.0043%29 May
dust22–13-0.0123%28 May
nuke2–13-0.0729%28 May
ancient13–80.059%28 May
dust213–9-0.0319%28 May
mirage13–6-0.0116%28 May
dust213–30.0622%27 May
mirage13–60.0628%27 May
ancient11–13-0.0322%27 May
ancient13–6-0.0312%27 May
ancient13–60.0518%27 May
dust216–130.0626%26 May
ancient16–13-0.0112%26 May
mirage13–60.0528%25 May
ancient13–10-0.0421%25 May
overpass13–80.0017%25 May
mirage12–16-0.0026%25 May
ancient13–100.0724%24 May
mirage13–80.0721%24 May
mirage13–100.0227%24 May
mirage13–9-0.0321%24 May
nuke13–8-0.0131%22 May
mirage13–8-0.0119%22 May
mirage10–13-0.0112%22 May
mirage25–230.0530%22 May
anubis10–130.0221%22 May
mirage13–50.1015%21 May
dust213–90.1125%21 May
mirage8–13-0.0127%20 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →