Dementor

Dementor — CS2 Stats

PRODEMENTORM1X KSKosovoRiflerSettings & gear profile →

XK76561198103921828[U:1:143656100]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,995Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,791 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,995 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 7 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,791 +0 28 Aug22 Sept · 11 observations
3,7913,791peak 3,79128 Aug22 Sept
3,791Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-02-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,791
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 209 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDementorFACEITLevel 10 · 3,791 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,791csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning56
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53461Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 455ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility7.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.6
Utility7.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time505ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 501ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 10 Apr
33%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 7 May
336msFastest reaction time · 7–1 · inferno, 6 May
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 10 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
812In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 77% over 26anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31141745%-0.00
dust2S2620677%0.01
ancientA1911858%0.00
anubisD93633%0.00
overpassD62433%0.01
infernoC52340%0.01
cache21150%-0.02
nuke2020%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,571Matches
57%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
83.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage58254%1.1616.4
Ancient52755%1.1716.6
Dust241157%1.1616.6
Anubis33457%1.1916.8
Inferno11261%1.1515.9
Overpass3540%1.1916.8
Vertigo2767%1.2716.2
Nuke2236%1.0615.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$1,946Inventory value22ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Butterfly Knife | Blue Steel (Battle-Scarred)$1,332★ Sport Gloves | Amphibious (Battle-Scarred)$332Desert Eagle | Printstream (Minimal Wear)$72AK-47 | Aquamarine Revenge (Field-Tested)$59AK-47 | Inheritance (Field-Tested)$55Glock-18 | AXIA (Field-Tested)$35

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
501msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
52.4%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
7.43HE damage / grenade
18.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7658% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–160.0330%19 Sept
dust213–9-0.0213%11 Sept
mirage13–80.1026%1 Sept
anubis11–130.0128%27 Aug
dust213–110.0115%20 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0714%20 Aug
dust213–90.0325%18 Aug
dust213–100.0225%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0220%18 Aug
mirage12–160.0029%14 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0118%10 Aug
dust214–16-0.0326%8 Aug
dust213–10-0.0019%5 Aug
ancient13–90.0412%28 Jul
cache13–6-0.0232%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0326%12 Jul
cache11–13-0.0316%12 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0322%25 Jun
anubis13–90.0222%24 Jun
dust210–13-0.0519%15 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0332%13 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0226%13 Jun
dust213–90.0220%11 Jun
anubis10–130.0723%11 Jun
ancient13–20.0518%10 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0011%10 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0012%10 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0520%30 May
overpass14–160.0321%29 May
mirage13–4-0.0226%29 May
ancient5–130.0116%25 May
mirage19–17-0.0119%24 May
ancient13–90.0414%24 May
overpass13–40.0719%23 May
ancient7–13-0.039%7 May
nuke4–130.0133%7 May
inferno7–10.0020%6 May
mirage13–30.0111%4 May
anubis7–13-0.0121%4 May
ancient6–13-0.0314%4 May
dust213–100.0324%2 May
dust213–11-0.0128%2 May
mirage13–90.0115%2 May
ancient4–13-0.0722%24 Apr
ancient13–80.0030%23 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0826%22 Apr
mirage11–130.0617%22 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0218%21 Apr
mirage13–90.0322%21 Apr
ancient19–160.0213%11 Apr
dust213–40.1620%10 Apr
dust213–11-0.0016%10 Apr
dust210–13-0.0510%8 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0118%8 Apr
dust27–130.0418%7 Apr
dust27–130.0114%7 Apr
mirage12–160.0115%7 Apr
dust213–70.0415%7 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0418%7 Apr
mirage13–70.0818%7 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0121%7 Apr
dust213–11-0.0112%3 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0319%3 Apr
mirage4–130.0111%3 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0031%2 Apr
mirage17–19-0.0117%1 Apr
anubis11–130.0113%1 Apr
inferno13–90.0818%31 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0330%31 Mar
dust213–30.0613%31 Mar
mirage12–16-0.0216%31 Mar
mirage13–70.0416%30 Mar
dust213–11-0.0320%30 Mar
dust213–100.0218%29 Mar
dust213–8-0.0210%29 Mar
mirage20–22-0.0216%29 Mar
anubis2–13-0.0713%29 Mar
mirage13–90.0020%24 Mar
ancient10–130.0017%24 Mar
dust213–100.0317%24 Mar
ancient13–50.0317%23 Mar
dust213–90.0118%23 Mar
mirage10–13-0.109%21 Mar
overpass3–130.0216%21 Mar
ancient13–90.0726%4 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0111%4 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0415%1 Mar
mirage6–130.0213%1 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0523%1 Mar
anubis13–40.0510%24 Feb
overpass1–10.000%24 Feb
mirage14–160.0218%24 Feb
ancient13–80.0917%22 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0329%22 Feb
dust213–50.1029%15 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0317%15 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0229%8 Feb
dust213–3-0.0112%8 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0113%7 Feb
ancient6–13-0.025%7 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →