sponce — CS2 Stats

76561198103775802[U:1:143510074]

1,526Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,883Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4884 of 24441 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,849 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning54

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateWWLLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.2

Aggression4.7

Utility5.8

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning5.4

Utility5.8

Mechanics9.1

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time506ms−48ms

first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms

Headshot accuracy22.6%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–7

13–0Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 17mirageWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	24	13–11	54%	-0.01
cache	S	17	12–5	71%	0.03
nuke	A	16	9–7	56%	0.01
dust2	D	16	5–11	31%	-0.01
anubis	B	14	7–7	50%	0.01
mirage	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.00
inferno	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.01
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

500Matches

53%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

79.0ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	91	52%	1.06	15.3
Ancient	52	52%	1.06	15.7
Anubis	50	58%	1.15	16.0
Inferno	37	51%	1.25	18.9
Dust2	34	38%	1.07	16.3
Nuke	27	67%	1.07	16.0
Overpass	20	50%	1.08	16.4
Vertigo	14	64%	1.10	15.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy

39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.4%Spray accuracy

91.1%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

512msReaction time

27.0%T opening success

49.4%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

2.8%Flash assists

6.86HE damage / grenade

15.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.0095% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–6	0.07	31%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	30%	28 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	38%	28 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.01	19%	27 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.07	14%	27 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.04	8%	27 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	19%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	30%	26 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	17%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.02	35%	26 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.05	13%	26 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	26%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.01	23%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	21%	26 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.04	30%	25 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	39%	25 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	23%	23 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.01	22%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	21%	21 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	22%	21 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	11%	21 Aug →
ancient	19–17	0.08	26%	21 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	14%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.01	15%	20 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	23%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	18%	19 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	15%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	15%	16 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	25%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.08	15%	16 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	25%	15 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.10	22%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.05	43%	14 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.09	25%	14 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	21%	14 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	25%	13 Aug →
nuke	19–17	0.02	14%	12 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.02	22%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.10	16%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	27%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–2	-0.02	11%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.05	18%	9 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	9%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	14%	9 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	16%	9 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.07	34%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.01	22%	9 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	12%	9 Aug →
ancient	12–12	-0.04	15%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–2	-0.02	29%	9 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	21%	9 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.02	9%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.04	22%	8 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	35%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.09	31%	8 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	17%	8 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.10	22%	7 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.06	25%	5 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.07	21%	5 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	10%	5 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.05	26%	4 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	20%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	21%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.01	18%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.00	19%	2 Aug →
shelter	10–13	0.02	32%	2 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.05	29%	1 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.05	23%	31 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	23%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.02	18%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	26%	31 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.00	41%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.02	25%	30 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	11%	30 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	19%	29 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.01	20%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.01	21%	29 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.13	24%	26 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	23%	26 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.03	24%	26 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.01	22%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.05	21%	25 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.11	0%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.11	35%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	29%	24 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	19%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.07	7%	23 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.00	18%	23 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	16%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–0	-0.04	45%	16 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	13%	16 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.07	20%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	26%	16 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.04	15%	13 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.01	20%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–2	-0.03	4%	13 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	24%	13 Jul →
ancient	16–12	-0.03	38%	13 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.01	26%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	8%	12 Jul →