kaysnax.

kaysnax. — CS2 Stats

AT76561198098925513[U:1:138659785]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,682Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,945Top 25% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31737 of 252061 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,891 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Oct 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,945 -312 1 Jul – 3 Oct · 4 days played
23,94524,257peak 24,2571 Jul3 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,891 +0 29 Aug – 1 Sept · 2 observations
1,8911,891peak 1,89129 Aug1 Sept
24,881Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,891Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-07-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,891
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 110 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 312 below peak (24,257)
  • -189 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,055 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkaysnax.FACEITLevel 9 · 1,891 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,945 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,891csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning52
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateLLWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −6.0pp headshot accuracy · +70ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.7
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.2
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time523ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 30 Sept →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 23 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · cache, 28 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 59% over 27nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2716–1159%0.01
infernoB2411–1346%-0.00
dust2A2112–957%-0.02
cacheC94–544%-0.00
anubisA74–357%0.01
nukeD51–420%-0.01
mirageC52–340%-0.02
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,099Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
75.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient57254%1.0215.5
Inferno40454%1.0314.8
Dust225045%0.9814.7
Anubis24943%1.0115.3
Nuke12949%1.0215.1
Mirage10943%0.9113.5
Overpass9648%1.1213.7
Vertigo6850%0.9414.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
515msReaction time
45.8%T opening success
32.8%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
12.63HE damage / grenade
7.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.7639% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0918%7 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.059%6 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0220%6 Oct →
nuke22–190.0017%6 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0123%5 Oct →
inferno16–190.0217%5 Oct →
inferno6–130.0019%3 Oct →
ancient13–70.1012%30 Sept →
inferno7–130.0119%30 Sept →
ancient13–90.048%30 Sept →
ancient13–90.0733%30 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0026%30 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0214%29 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0217%29 Sept →
dust213–30.0118%29 Sept →
ancient13–00.0331%29 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0124%29 Sept →
cache3–13-0.044%28 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0324%28 Sept →
inferno7–130.0031%28 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0620%24 Sept →
cache8–130.079%24 Sept →
mirage13–50.0544%23 Sept →
ancient16–120.0323%22 Sept →
dust213–50.0024%22 Sept →
inferno13–50.0220%22 Sept →
ancient5–130.0016%22 Sept →
inferno13–80.0519%22 Sept →
dust213–50.0219%22 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0715%22 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0811%22 Sept →
dust213–50.0427%21 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0326%18 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0327%18 Sept →
ancient14–160.0115%18 Sept →
dust213–80.0228%17 Sept →
inferno16–140.0716%16 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0220%15 Sept →
anubis7–130.0319%15 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0029%11 Sept →
inferno13–100.0913%10 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0224%6 Sept →
ancient13–90.0815%4 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0137%1 Sept →
anubis16–130.0519%1 Sept →
inferno13–100.0131%26 Aug →
ancient13–90.0229%25 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0228%24 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0217%19 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0321%18 Aug →
ancient13–80.0216%18 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0223%18 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0128%17 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0612%17 Aug →
anubis16–19-0.0013%16 Aug →
inferno16–120.0617%13 Aug →
dust213–90.0424%13 Aug →
inferno16–140.0220%13 Aug →
anubis11–130.057%12 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0419%11 Aug →
ancient0–13-0.066%11 Aug →
cache13–20.0216%11 Aug →
dust216–140.0218%11 Aug →
ancient9–130.0314%6 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0912%6 Aug →
ancient13–110.0124%5 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0623%5 Aug →
fachwerk13–7-0.0219%4 Aug →
ancient19–150.006%21 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0321%17 Jul →
inferno13–110.0215%16 Jul →
ancient5–130.0323%15 Jul →
dust211–13-0.068%15 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.063%15 Jul →
ancient13–70.0114%15 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0414%14 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0520%14 Jul →
anubis13–90.0219%13 Jul →
dust24–130.0618%13 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0617%9 Jul →
ancient13–80.0116%9 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0218%9 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0424%8 Jul →
vertigo13–40.0614%8 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0515%8 Jul →
cache12–120.0224%8 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0238%8 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0619%7 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0514%7 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0524%7 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0218%6 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0128%6 Jul →
cache13–50.047%5 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0111%5 Jul →
ancient13–30.016%5 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0619%3 Jul →
ancient4–130.0216%2 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0016%1 Jul →
ancient6–130.0114%1 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0525%1 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.