juho — CS2 Stats

PRO“Dr.Zanzibar”fish123FinlandRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198098536184[U:1:138270456]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,138Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since

17,226Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#44140 of 55732 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,811 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,811 +0 29 Aug – 30 Aug · 2 observations

3,811Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

2Days observed since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

At peak — 3,811
Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 189 to go
Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=4,917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	63.4%	51.9%
Shot accuracy	20.0%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.08	1.08
Match win rate	55.5%	48.7%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning48

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateWLLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression6.6

Utility5.3

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning4.8

Utility5.3

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time565ms+75ms

first ⅓ avg 490ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms

Headshot accuracy29.2%+7.0%

first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 29.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 0–7

13–0Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 37% over 27

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	27	10–17	37%	0.01
dust2	C	23	9–14	39%	0.01
nuke	A	22	14–8	64%	0.01
ancient	B	13	6–7	46%	0.01
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.00
overpass	S	5	5–0	100%	0.03
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

948,591Lifetime kills

1.08K/D

18,403Matches

55.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 10 players

63.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players

20.0%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 10 players

70,415MVPs

16,643Hours (in match)

22,196Bombs planted

5,503Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47519,714

M4A4 / M4A1-S116,653

AWP109,685

Desert Eagle69,001

P2000 / USP-S47,944

Glock-1814,464

Knife14,363

P25012,482

MP94,637

SSG 084,561

Lifetime map wins

43,112dust2

23,966nuke

21,712train

21,445inferno

5,327cbble

2,547vertigo

58aztec

43office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

11,999Matches

59%Win rate

1.36Avg K/D

88.0ADR

53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

29Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	1495	55%	1.21	18.0
Ancient	664	56%	1.15	17.4
Dust2	613	54%	1.21	17.8
Nuke	559	58%	1.22	17.7
Inferno	153	52%	1.16	17.5
Overpass	145	48%	1.22	19.0
Anubis	137	53%	0.99	15.3
Vertigo	84	44%	1.10	17.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$2,583Inventory value56ItemsFull inventory breakdown →

$1,012

$329

$326

$300

$196

$170

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.4%Headshot accuracy

34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.9%Spray accuracy

78.9%Counter-strafing

7.6°Preaim

561msReaction time

28.2%T opening success

55.9%CT opening success

0.78Enemies flashed / flash

10.9%Flash assists

5.40HE damage / grenade

4.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.1952% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–5	0.06	36%	25 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.02	27%	17 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.07	45%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–1	-0.06	26%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.01	25%	27 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.10	41%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.00	21%	22 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.09	31%	6 May →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	25%	4 May →
dust2	13–0	0.03	19%	23 Apr →
mirage	9–13	0.11	38%	20 Apr →
dust2	13–6	0.08	40%	20 Apr →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	21%	13 Apr →
nuke	12–16	-0.05	33%	13 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	19%	29 Mar →
anubis	9–13	0.00	29%	29 Mar →
mirage	9–13	0.04	22%	26 Mar →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	22%	23 Mar →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	24%	5 Mar →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	55%	3 Mar →
nuke	13–7	0.03	34%	2 Mar →
nuke	19–22	-0.02	31%	27 Feb →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	22%	19 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.02	33%	16 Feb →
dust2	10–13	0.02	24%	13 Feb →
mirage	11–13	0.00	44%	12 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	31%	11 Feb →
ancient	13–5	0.01	30%	5 Feb →
mirage	2–13	-0.13	9%	5 Feb →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	15%	5 Feb →
nuke	13–8	0.00	20%	2 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.01	45%	29 Jan →
mirage	10–13	0.09	24%	28 Jan →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	15%	26 Jan →
mirage	16–14	0.01	24%	15 Jan →
nuke	13–9	0.07	30%	13 Jan →
mirage	0–7	0.20	75%	12 Jan →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	29%	6 Jan →
overpass	13–11	0.02	19%	4 Jan →
nuke	13–3	0.09	25%	2 Jan →
ancient	9–12	-0.02	29%	1 Jan →
ancient	7–13	0.03	29%	1 Jan →
nuke	11–13	0.08	27%	1 Jan →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	39%	30 Dec →
dust2	13–3	0.01	50%	30 Dec →
overpass	13–7	-0.05	12%	30 Dec →
nuke	10–13	0.03	27%	30 Dec →
dust2	13–3	0.05	24%	30 Dec →
mirage	13–9	0.01	35%	30 Dec →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	15%	12 Dec →
mirage	8–13	0.01	26%	12 Dec →
ancient	14–16	-0.00	24%	11 Dec →
mirage	13–11	0.01	24%	11 Dec →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	21%	10 Dec →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	22%	10 Dec →
nuke	13–10	0.07	22%	10 Dec →
overpass	13–8	0.07	23%	10 Dec →
dust2	11–13	0.08	29%	10 Dec →
ancient	13–11	0.07	23%	10 Dec →
ancient	7–13	0.01	17%	10 Dec →
inferno	9–13	0.11	26%	9 Dec →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	34%	3 Dec →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	28%	28 Nov →
dust2	12–12	-0.03	33%	28 Nov →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	26%	28 Nov →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	26%	28 Nov →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	23%	21 Nov →
dust2	13–2	0.03	21%	18 Nov →
nuke	2–13	-0.03	16%	18 Nov →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	28%	18 Nov →
mirage	13–16	0.08	33%	18 Nov →
overpass	13–9	0.04	23%	17 Nov →
nuke	13–6	0.08	36%	17 Nov →
mirage	13–5	0.13	18%	14 Nov →
ancient	13–10	0.04	13%	13 Nov →
dust2	5–13	0.11	29%	13 Nov →
nuke	13–11	0.01	24%	12 Nov →
dust2	12–12	0.03	23%	8 Nov →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	31%	8 Nov →
dust2	7–13	0.01	20%	8 Nov →
train	13–8	0.09	34%	6 Nov →
inferno	13–9	0.01	35%	6 Nov →
overpass	13–8	0.07	25%	4 Nov →
inferno	13–11	0.08	16%	4 Nov →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	11%	4 Nov →
inferno	1–13	-0.07	30%	29 Oct →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	24%	29 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.03	20%	26 Oct →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	29%	22 Oct →
ancient	22–20	0.04	29%	20 Oct →
nuke	13–9	0.01	21%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	20%	18 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	22%	18 Oct →
nuke	13–10	-0.05	13%	18 Oct →
mirage	16–14	0.00	14%	18 Oct →
mirage	0–1	0.00	0%	18 Oct →
mirage	1–0	0.00	0%	18 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.02	24%	17 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.07	25%	17 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	23%	16 Oct →