msc — CS2 Stats

76561198098469774[U:1:138204046]✓ No bans

968Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,699Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning58

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY64–27–9Last 10064%Win rateWLWWTLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression7.3

Utility5.6

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels3.7

Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning5.8

Utility5.6

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact7.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.06

Reaction time533ms−43ms

first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms

Headshot accuracy19.1%+5.1%

first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 13–1

13–0Biggest win — nuke

7Longest win streak

8–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 91% over 11dust2Weakest map · 50% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	19	10–9	53%	0.03
mirage	A	18	11–7	61%	0.05
cache	S	18	13–5	72%	0.06
dust2	B	16	8–8	50%	0.03
nuke	S	11	10–1	91%	0.07
ancient	A	10	6–4	60%	0.07
overpass	—	4	3–1	75%	0.07
anubis	—	3	3–0	100%	0.10
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,137Matches

57%Win rate

1.30Avg K/D

80.3ADR

34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	44	48%	1.10	15.5
Inferno	30	47%	1.14	16.0
Nuke	22	55%	1.30	18.4
Dust2	21	52%	1.07	17.9
Anubis	13	23%	1.07	18.5
Ancient	12	75%	1.15	15.1
Overpass	9	33%	1.13	17.9
Cache	4	75%	1.44	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy

41.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.1%Spray accuracy

83.7%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

524msReaction time

34.2%T opening success

55.8%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

9.6%Flash assists

10.85HE damage / grenade

7.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4988 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.2107% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–11	-0.00	6%	28 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	14%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.17	13%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.11	25%	28 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.05	14%	28 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.02	24%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.11	14%	27 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	13%	27 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.08	9%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.06	16%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.08	19%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.18	18%	24 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.12	20%	24 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.02	28%	24 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.12	13%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.17	21%	22 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	22%	22 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	13%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.03	19%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–0	0.13	21%	19 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	20%	6 Aug →
overpass	2–13	0.05	35%	5 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.06	21%	5 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.04	18%	4 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.00	7%	2 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.05	21%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.09	33%	2 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	19%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	26%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.13	17%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.05	24%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.06	20%	19 Jul →
mirage	0–3	-0.05	29%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	13%	16 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	16%	10 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.05	12%	9 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	20%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.03	19%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.06	3%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.03	11%	2 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.10	11%	2 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	12%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.09	12%	28 May →
nuke	13–9	0.07	18%	28 May →
cache	13–5	0.01	15%	23 May →
dust2	13–7	0.02	6%	23 May →
inferno	12–12	0.05	16%	23 May →
nuke	13–6	0.10	6%	22 May →
cache	13–11	0.08	12%	22 May →
ancient	13–7	0.03	23%	21 May →
cache	13–7	0.04	6%	21 May →
dust2	13–3	0.07	26%	21 May →
mirage	13–6	0.05	13%	21 May →
mirage	9–0	0.04	13%	20 May →
dust2	10–13	0.03	9%	20 May →
cache	8–13	0.05	11%	20 May →
mirage	13–7	0.03	19%	19 May →
cache	13–7	0.13	17%	19 May →
ancient	9–13	0.03	12%	18 May →
cache	13–11	0.02	9%	18 May →
mirage	13–7	0.06	13%	18 May →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	12%	18 May →
inferno	13–4	0.06	20%	17 May →
mirage	12–12	0.13	17%	17 May →
overpass	13–6	0.03	15%	17 May →
cache	9–13	0.09	15%	16 May →
mirage	12–12	0.10	17%	16 May →
dust2	13–11	0.06	16%	16 May →
nuke	13–2	0.11	24%	16 May →
inferno	8–13	0.09	11%	14 May →
dust2	13–4	-0.00	11%	14 May →
dust2	13–9	0.07	15%	12 May →
cache	11–13	0.04	13%	12 May →
inferno	13–11	0.03	15%	12 May →
ancient	12–0	0.14	13%	11 May →
cache	13–6	0.16	14%	11 May →
mirage	9–13	0.04	8%	11 May →
nuke	13–3	0.08	4%	10 May →
overpass	13–8	0.07	12%	10 May →
inferno	13–4	0.16	13%	10 May →
mirage	13–6	0.04	15%	10 May →
inferno	13–10	0.05	18%	9 May →
cache	12–12	0.02	17%	9 May →
dust2	13–1	0.19	11%	7 May →
cache	13–10	0.05	18%	7 May →
mirage	13–3	0.05	20%	7 May →
cache	10–2	0.05	15%	6 May →
overpass	13–9	0.12	11%	4 May →
cache	13–7	0.10	14%	4 May →
mirage	9–13	0.03	8%	3 May →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	8%	3 May →
inferno	13–7	0.02	15%	2 May →
dust2	9–13	0.04	17%	2 May →
cache	6–13	-0.02	24%	2 May →
cache	13–11	0.08	13%	2 May →
nuke	16–13	0.07	6%	30 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.04	19%	30 Apr →
nuke	13–2	0.01	9%	30 Apr →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	17%	30 Apr →
cache	13–6	0.11	18%	29 Apr →