ZeronX

ZeronX — CS2 Stats

AT76561198095992431[U:1:135726703]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

746Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,325Top 25% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29444 of 258973 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,133 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,325 -2,539 15 Oct – 30 Oct · 20 days played
24,32527,992peak 27,99215 Oct30 Oct
27,992Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,133Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2025-10-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,133
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 367 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,667 below peak (27,992)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 675 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZeronXFACEITLevel 9 · 2,133 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,325 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,133csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning55
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateLWWLWTWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −44ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.5
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time570ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · nuke, 10 Feb →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · overpass, 21 Dec →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 28 Dec →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 14 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
13–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 50% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2211–1150%-0.01
infernoB2010–1050%-0.01
nukeB179–853%0.01
mirageA116–555%-0.01
overpassA106–460%-0.00
cacheA85–363%0.00
anubisB63–350%-0.01
ancientS64–267%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,540Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
73.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4657%1.0615.0
Anubis4363%1.0214.1
Ancient4231%0.9214.6
Inferno3569%1.1815.1
Dust23266%1.1015.0
Nuke1669%1.1314.1
Overpass933%1.1914.3
Train743%0.9615.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
578msReaction time
38.8%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
11.3%Flash assists
10.89HE damage / grenade
6.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.8168% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–130.0524%30 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0213%14 Oct →
inferno13–70.0624%14 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0619%14 Oct →
dust213–10.0230%14 Oct →
inferno15–150.0118%11 Oct →
mirage2–00.000%11 Oct →
cache16–140.0317%11 Oct →
dust213–160.0421%11 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0215%11 Oct →
dust216–140.0731%11 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0136%8 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0220%8 Oct →
cache13–2-0.0434%8 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.029%2 Oct →
cache13–70.0111%30 Sept →
dust28–13-0.1020%30 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.028%30 Sept →
anubis16–140.0124%30 Sept →
ancient13–30.0816%12 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0318%3 Sept →
inferno13–100.0318%23 Aug →
nuke13–50.0423%13 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0726%20 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0321%17 Jul →
ancient16–120.0318%17 Jul →
ancient13–50.0028%6 Jul →
mirage13–100.0728%23 Jun →
dust213–2-0.0130%23 Jun →
inferno14–16-0.0618%23 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0428%20 Jun →
nuke13–50.0126%20 Jun →
overpass0–13-0.1113%7 Jun →
dust213–100.0318%7 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0631%14 May →
nuke13–4-0.0416%14 May →
inferno13–60.0223%14 May →
cache13–80.0926%14 May →
nuke11–13-0.0411%13 May →
anubis13–11-0.0418%13 May →
nuke13–110.0513%29 Apr →
cache12–12-0.0315%29 Apr →
anubis11–130.0320%29 Apr →
mirage13–70.0027%29 Apr →
cache13–30.0317%29 Apr →
overpass13–11-0.0119%22 Apr →
inferno13–7-0.0143%22 Apr →
mirage13–3-0.0023%12 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0516%12 Apr →
overpass16–14-0.0212%15 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.0711%15 Mar →
nuke13–80.1220%10 Feb →
mirage12–16-0.0324%10 Feb →
dust213–70.0728%10 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.047%6 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0435%4 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.0421%4 Feb →
anubis13–9-0.0130%4 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0920%4 Feb →
ancient13–20.0618%4 Feb →
nuke7–130.1220%4 Feb →
inferno13–80.0012%3 Feb →
dust213–8-0.0123%3 Feb →
overpass13–100.0422%3 Feb →
ancient11–130.0315%3 Feb →
dust24–13-0.0613%3 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0124%2 Feb →
nuke15–15-0.0110%2 Feb →
inferno13–80.0114%2 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0318%2 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0214%2 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0611%1 Feb →
overpass13–60.0614%1 Feb →
inferno16–130.0126%31 Jan →
mirage13–90.0423%31 Jan →
nuke16–120.0320%24 Jan →
inferno13–16-0.0229%24 Jan →
dust213–20.0315%24 Jan →
nuke13–80.0117%24 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0217%24 Jan →
dust213–70.015%24 Jan →
dust213–100.0924%22 Jan →
anubis9–13-0.0110%22 Jan →
inferno13–50.0724%22 Jan →
overpass8–130.0322%1 Jan →
inferno5–13-0.018%28 Dec →
nuke13–90.0122%23 Dec →
dust213–11-0.0412%23 Dec →
overpass13–20.0313%21 Dec →
overpass0–3-0.03100%21 Dec →
inferno4–13-0.0924%21 Dec →
nuke14–160.0116%27 Nov →
overpass13–11-0.0318%27 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0916%27 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0326%16 Nov →
overpass8–13-0.0115%25 Oct →
inferno12–120.0421%24 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0712%24 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.1010%15 Oct →
mirage11–130.0128%15 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.