DDirocco

DDirocco — CS2 Stats

US76561198095312121[U:1:135046393]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,107Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,015Hours in CS34Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+34Tracked matches · now 1,107
0.0ppWin rate · 44.8% → 44.8%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 57 days played since 14 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +659 23 Jun2 Jul · 4 days played
19,34019,999peak 19,99923 Jun2 Jul
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,629Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2026-06-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2115+6
Win rate38%53%−15pp
K/D0.851.02−0.17
Headshot %59%52%+7pp

Measured 12 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate46.4%48.3%51.0%4.6% short
Shot accuracy13.7%13.2%13.7%meets
Kill/death ratio0.961.071.090.13 short
Match win rate42.2%46.9%48.4%6.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDDiroccoFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,629csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning47
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56422Last 10056%Win rateLWLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +7.3pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.2
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning4.7
Utility5.2
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time543ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy29.5%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 29.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–7 · anubis, 2 Jul
68%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · cache, 28 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · cache, 1 Sept
13–1Biggest win · cache, 26 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 11nukeWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB1991047%-0.01
mirageA1810856%0.00
dust2S1711665%-0.01
ancientB147750%-0.00
cacheS118373%0.04
anubisA106460%0.03
nukeC73443%-0.01
vertigo32167%-0.05
train1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

86,956Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
5,090Matches
42.2%Match win rate
46.4%Headshot %
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
11,731MVPs
2,020Hours (in match)
2,185Bombs planted
1,079Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,699
AWP10,422
P2502,658
Knife1,923
SSG 081,855

Lifetime map wins

6,885dust2
4,729inferno
2,049nuke
853vertigo
793train
766cbble
313lake
227office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

544Matches
49%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
80.6ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust213251%1.0616.4
Mirage11845%1.0415.4
Ancient6948%1.0716.4
Inferno6850%0.9916.8
Anubis5048%1.0315.9
Cache4060%1.1517.6
Nuke1963%1.1916.2
Overpass933%0.9216.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.8%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
531msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
11.69HE damage / grenade
4.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6692% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0719%16 Sept
inferno9–20.1157%13 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0018%13 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0626%12 Sept
nuke13–2-0.0134%12 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0526%11 Sept
cache8–130.0132%10 Sept
nuke9–130.0152%10 Sept
inferno16–14-0.0233%9 Sept
dust213–60.0123%9 Sept
vertigo5–13-0.0815%3 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0520%3 Sept
mirage4–13-0.076%2 Sept
cache13–110.0029%1 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0319%31 Aug
dust24–13-0.0130%30 Aug
mirage11–130.0426%29 Aug
cache13–100.0468%28 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0221%21 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0613%20 Aug
inferno13–110.0329%15 Aug
train12–120.0137%15 Aug
cache13–8-0.0226%14 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0416%12 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0841%9 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0116%8 Aug
nuke13–30.0526%8 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0347%8 Aug
ancient13–70.0732%6 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0254%6 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0142%5 Aug
dust213–6-0.0113%3 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0426%2 Aug
inferno5–9-0.1540%31 Jul
cache13–80.0425%30 Jul
dust210–13-0.0024%29 Jul
dust24–13-0.0236%27 Jul
dust213–8-0.0240%26 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0242%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.0533%26 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0413%26 Jul
anubis16–190.0329%26 Jul
nuke6–130.0424%25 Jul
inferno13–160.0236%22 Jul
inferno16–130.0127%18 Jul
dust213–100.0241%18 Jul
dust213–70.0329%13 Jul
mirage13–40.0432%13 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0131%13 Jul
dust213–10-0.0437%12 Jul
cache8–130.0530%12 Jul
vertigo13–10-0.0142%12 Jul
mirage13–80.0321%11 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0124%10 Jul
dust213–100.0218%10 Jul
dust211–130.0121%9 Jul
cache13–80.0838%9 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0624%8 Jul
cache13–50.1227%8 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0520%8 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0626%8 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0547%7 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0124%7 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0025%5 Jul
dust222–20-0.0221%3 Jul
anubis13–30.0518%3 Jul
anubis13–100.0323%2 Jul
anubis13–70.1627%2 Jul
inferno13–90.0416%2 Jul
anubis11–130.0223%1 Jul
inferno12–120.0624%30 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0440%29 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0220%27 Jun
inferno13–100.0619%26 Jun
cache13–10.1628%26 Jun
mirage13–80.1226%26 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0513%25 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0214%25 Jun
dust213–5-0.0326%25 Jun
ancient8–130.0628%25 Jun
mirage13–50.0237%25 Jun
anubis13–70.0617%23 Jun
ancient13–60.0635%23 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0135%22 Jun
dust213–11-0.0432%22 Jun
mirage19–150.0523%22 Jun
anubis13–80.0631%22 Jun
mirage13–70.1530%21 Jun
cache13–80.0118%21 Jun
ancient13–40.0112%20 Jun
cache6–13-0.0427%20 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0419%19 Jun
dust213–30.0724%19 Jun
ancient13–50.0034%19 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0029%18 Jun
ancient13–90.0131%18 Jun
dust28–13-0.0621%17 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0627%17 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0229%15 Jun
vertigo13–10-0.0629%14 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →