TrittærN

TrittærN — CS2 Stats

NO76561198093767622[U:1:133501894]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,951Tracked matches77%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,039Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,490 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,490 → 2,490
+13Tracked matches · now 1,951
+3.3ppWin rate · 73.3% → 76.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 25 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,893 -59 27 Nov16 Jan · 8 days played
25,89326,610peak 26,61027 Nov16 Jan
26,717Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,490Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2025-11-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,490
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 10 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches141+13
Win rate36%0%+36pp
K/D0.572.85−2.28
Headshot %72%75%−3pp

Measured 14 Sep 202622 Sep 2026; previous 7 Sep 2026 → 14 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,629), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate51.4%48.3%51.0%meets
Shot accuracy14.5%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.071.09above
Match win rate44.8%46.9%48.4%3.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTrittærNFACEITLevel 9 · 2,490 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,490csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning61
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY65323Last 10065%Win rateWWLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning6.1
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time558ms+22ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 12–12 · vertigo, 16 Apr
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 17 Feb
375msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · nuke, 14 Dec
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 14 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
W2Current streak
143In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 10overpassWeakest map · 58% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1912763%0.02
overpassA1911858%-0.00
mirageA1811761%0.01
infernoS1711665%-0.01
anubisS108280%0.01
trainS108280%0.01
nuke32167%0.06
cache220100%0.01
dust21010%0.03
vertigo1010%0.19

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (58% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

160,262Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
5,992Matches
44.8%Match win rate
51.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
17,170MVPs
2,945Hours (in match)
3,563Bombs planted
2,294Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4768,583
AWP27,598
Knife2,955
MP92,141
P2501,459

Lifetime map wins

8,377inferno
8,067vertigo
4,665dust2
2,590train
1,342nuke
1,198cbble
94safehouse
85bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,665Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
74.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient22157%0.9614.7
Anubis13747%0.9715.7
Vertigo10959%1.0114.8
Inferno8744%0.9013.9
Overpass8165%1.0515.1
Mirage7745%0.9715.0
Train4262%1.0314.7
Nuke1753%0.8613.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
560msReaction time
38.3%T opening success
64.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
11.12HE damage / grenade
7.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.2989% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–100.0629%22 Sept
anubis13–60.0431%18 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0313%17 Sept
dust26–130.0318%5 Sept
cache13–110.0633%25 Aug
ancient13–100.0124%18 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0619%18 Jun
inferno13–9-0.088%14 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0017%6 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0320%6 Jun
nuke13–100.0336%11 May
inferno13–60.0132%8 May
ancient9–130.0421%8 May
anubis13–110.0523%8 May
mirage16–14-0.0017%29 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0510%24 Apr
inferno13–70.0521%23 Apr
anubis6–130.0225%23 Apr
inferno13–50.0011%23 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0222%23 Apr
anubis13–70.0216%23 Apr
anubis13–50.0214%22 Apr
cache13–11-0.0416%22 Apr
anubis13–30.0422%22 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0417%22 Apr
inferno16–140.0216%22 Apr
inferno16–140.0518%21 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0314%21 Apr
ancient13–110.0118%20 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0214%20 Apr
overpass1–13-0.1024%20 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0014%20 Apr
mirage8–130.0019%20 Apr
ancient13–90.0415%20 Apr
vertigo12–120.1920%16 Apr
nuke13–50.1635%15 Apr
ancient15–15-0.039%15 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0311%14 Apr
mirage13–0-0.0318%14 Apr
ancient13–70.0531%12 Mar
mirage13–90.0525%12 Mar
inferno11–130.0516%5 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0022%3 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0115%3 Mar
anubis7–130.0032%20 Feb
ancient13–40.0643%17 Feb
ancient16–130.0120%13 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0320%7 Feb
anubis13–8-0.059%5 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0220%29 Jan
inferno5–130.0219%29 Jan
overpass13–90.0820%23 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0018%16 Jan
inferno3–13-0.0613%16 Jan
ancient7–130.0015%16 Jan
inferno13–16-0.0322%10 Jan
mirage13–40.0213%8 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0020%8 Jan
train8–130.0026%7 Jan
mirage13–30.0219%7 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0126%6 Jan
overpass16–140.0221%6 Jan
train13–9-0.0219%4 Jan
train13–11-0.0113%4 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0120%4 Jan
overpass13–9-0.0320%3 Jan
overpass13–20.0421%1 Jan
train13–80.1121%1 Jan
overpass13–40.019%31 Dec
overpass13–100.0411%31 Dec
ancient13–90.0422%30 Dec
train13–3-0.0227%30 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0313%29 Dec
train13–20.0319%29 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0410%28 Dec
overpass10–13-0.0221%16 Dec
mirage15–150.0128%16 Dec
mirage12–160.0726%14 Dec
nuke11–13-0.0015%14 Dec
ancient25–220.0024%12 Dec
mirage13–110.0118%11 Dec
overpass9–13-0.0418%10 Dec
train10–130.0122%9 Dec
ancient13–100.0314%9 Dec
overpass4–130.0718%9 Dec
overpass13–30.0521%8 Dec
train13–9-0.0318%5 Dec
mirage13–100.0319%5 Dec
inferno13–8-0.0218%4 Dec
mirage13–80.1320%29 Nov
ancient8–13-0.019%29 Nov
overpass13–5-0.0117%28 Nov
ancient13–80.0526%28 Nov
overpass12–16-0.0019%28 Nov
train13–10.0720%28 Nov
overpass10–13-0.0316%27 Nov
train13–90.0219%27 Nov
mirage16–140.0321%27 Nov
mirage13–10-0.0215%25 Nov
ancient13–50.0621%25 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →