xaler ツ

xaler ツ — CS2 Stats

US76561198093067133[U:1:132801405]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,376Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,411Top 10% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9832 of 251321 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,411 -3,574 19 Apr – 23 Sept · 11 days played
26,41130,900peak 30,90019 Apr23 Sept
30,900Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,647Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-04-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,647
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 353 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,489 below peak (30,900)
  • -3,016 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,589 to go
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxaler ツPREMIER26,411 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,647csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning59
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY70–28–2Last 10070%Win rateLWWLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −67ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.8
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.9
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time612ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy26.0%+6.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.40Best match rating · 9–0 · poseidon, 15 Jun →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · dust2, 12 Jul →
375msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · anubis, 13 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

poseidonBest map · 100% over 5dust2Weakest map · 47% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2115–671%0.04
dust2B157–847%0.02
ancientA106–460%-0.03
mirageS107–370%0.00
cacheS109–190%0.06
infernoS98–189%0.09
anubisA74–357%-0.02
poseidonS55–0100%0.14
vertigo—43–175%0.15
overpass—42–250%0.02
debris—32–167%0.07
eldorado—11–0100%0.05
sanctum—11–0100%0.20

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,331Matches
59%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
76.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13857%1.3216.5
Nuke9865%1.2314.8
Ancient9660%1.2716.1
Anubis6067%1.2114.2
Inferno5258%1.2915.8
Dust23954%1.2914.3
Overpass3370%1.3515.4
Vertigo1759%1.2017.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.7%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
576msReaction time
40.4%T opening success
38.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
8.14HE damage / grenade
14.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.9493% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0227%23 Sept →
dust213–30.0241%23 Sept →
nuke13–90.0120%6 Sept →
dust210–130.0229%6 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0612%6 Sept →
nuke13–110.0913%6 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0936%12 Aug →
vertigo9–30.0716%5 Aug →
nuke9–60.0228%5 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0530%5 Aug →
cache13–50.1438%1 Aug →
debris9–4-0.0229%29 Jul →
nuke1–9-0.270%29 Jul →
poseidon9–40.0133%29 Jul →
vertigo9–20.1316%29 Jul →
debris9–30.1119%29 Jul →
nuke9–30.0819%29 Jul →
inferno9–10.3154%29 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0814%22 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0429%19 Jul →
nuke13–90.0130%18 Jul →
ancient13–60.0228%15 Jul →
ancient0–2-0.1650%15 Jul →
cache13–50.0325%15 Jul →
dust20–40.0060%12 Jul →
mirage13–60.0614%12 Jul →
debris8–80.1115%12 Jul →
eldorado9–70.0513%12 Jul →
cache13–110.0832%11 Jul →
anubis13–40.0217%11 Jul →
mirage13–70.0113%11 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0514%9 Jul →
nuke13–10.0843%9 Jul →
mirage13–10.0519%9 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0323%6 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.009%6 Jul →
nuke0–13-0.0436%2 Jul →
nuke9–70.1019%29 Jun →
inferno9–30.2521%29 Jun →
nuke9–10.2039%26 Jun →
vertigo7–90.0531%26 Jun →
poseidon9–10.2029%26 Jun →
inferno9–50.0522%26 Jun →
poseidon9–30.0750%15 Jun →
poseidon9–00.4021%15 Jun →
nuke9–20.0450%15 Jun →
inferno9–40.1233%15 Jun →
poseidon9–60.0133%9 Jun →
dust28–130.0427%28 May →
mirage13–90.0819%23 May →
cache13–70.0132%16 May →
cache13–20.0924%16 May →
nuke12–16-0.0130%16 May →
cache13–80.1323%3 May →
cache13–30.1424%3 May →
nuke8–80.0220%2 May →
sanctum9–20.2035%2 May →
inferno9–5-0.0023%2 May →
cache13–90.0630%1 May →
anubis5–13-0.0933%29 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0221%29 Apr →
cache13–8-0.0323%28 Apr →
ancient13–100.0015%28 Apr →
dust213–50.0327%28 Apr →
ancient13–70.0117%27 Apr →
mirage13–100.0027%27 Apr →
dust213–10.2019%27 Apr →
ancient13–50.0017%27 Apr →
vertigo9–20.3317%26 Apr →
nuke9–10.2017%26 Apr →
inferno9–20.1431%26 Apr →
dust213–110.0623%26 Apr →
nuke13–30.0816%26 Apr →
dust21–13-0.0439%25 Apr →
overpass7–0-0.0513%25 Apr →
nuke13–60.1723%25 Apr →
mirage13–90.0216%22 Apr →
mirage13–100.0024%21 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0417%21 Apr →
inferno13–20.0221%21 Apr →
nuke5–130.0325%21 Apr →
dust213–50.0513%19 Apr →
anubis13–10-0.0118%19 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0018%18 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0121%15 Apr →
anubis13–100.0219%15 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0416%15 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0528%13 Apr →
overpass10–130.0222%13 Apr →
dust21–13-0.0516%13 Apr →
overpass13–40.0615%13 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.0427%13 Apr →
nuke16–130.0626%12 Apr →
ancient16–130.0023%12 Apr →
dust213–100.0419%10 Apr →
overpass6–130.0314%10 Apr →
nuke19–17-0.0211%10 Apr →
dust28–130.0521%10 Apr →
dust213–50.0012%7 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.0613%4 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.