Kyytt

Kyytt — CS2 Stats

TN76561198089535468[U:1:129269740]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

519Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,626Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,622 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,622 → 1,622
+1Tracked matches · now 519
0.0ppWin rate · 59.3% → 59.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 75 days played since 11 Jun 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,029 +1,191 11 Jun21 Oct · 15 days played
15,77718,313peak 18,31311 Jun21 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,622 +0 16 Sept17 Sept · 2 observations
1,6221,622peak 1,62216 Sept17 Sept
18,313Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,622Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
75Days played since 2025-06-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,622
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 129 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate53.4%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy8.0%13.2%13.7%5.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.741.071.090.35 short
Match win rate34.8%46.9%48.4%13.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKyyttFACEITLevel 9 · 1,622 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,622csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning51
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44533Last 10044%Win rateLWTLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 20

  • 983 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.1
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact8.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time627ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy27.0%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 27.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 4–1 · grail, 27 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 21 Mar
391msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · office, 22 Jan
13–0Biggest win · cache, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6overpassWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C167944%-0.00
cacheB147750%0.02
ancientD1441029%-0.02
mirageB105550%-0.01
anubisA95456%-0.01
overpassD92722%-0.03
vertigoD62433%-0.04
trainB63350%-0.02
infernoS65183%-0.02
nukeC52340%-0.02
office21150%0.01
grail110100%0.08
jura1010%-0.08
agency1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

97,988Lifetime kills
0.74K/D
4,466Matches
34.8%Match win rate
53.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
8.0%Shot accuracy
9,626MVPs
2,626Hours (in match)
1,540Bombs planted
1,021Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,701
AWP14,431
FAMAS2,121
P901,940
Knife1,466

Lifetime map wins

9,745dust2
3,151inferno
1,248nuke
666vertigo
628train
522office
135cbble
42lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

427Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
83.8ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11947%1.1417.3
Dust29051%1.1616.8
Ancient6752%1.2418.3
Inferno6557%1.1117.3
Nuke3158%1.1215.7
Anubis2763%1.2118.1
Overpass1850%1.1315.1
Train40%0.8312.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.3%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
624msReaction time
25.3%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
9.62HE damage / grenade
6.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4449 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.2946% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.0918%16 Sept
dust213–20.0229%9 Sept
office12–120.0120%2 Sept
cache9–13-0.0129%26 Aug
dust213–60.0236%20 Aug
cache6–130.0239%19 Aug
cache9–130.0121%19 Aug
cache2–130.0532%19 Aug
cache13–90.0526%8 Aug
cache13–00.0116%7 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0527%29 Jul
cache12–120.0532%22 Jul
anubis6–130.0428%22 Jul
cache8–130.0537%14 Jul
dust27–130.0230%6 Jul
cache13–3-0.0122%1 Jul
cache13–70.0130%1 Jul
cache12–120.0330%25 Jun
cache13–40.0029%24 Jun
cache13–30.0331%10 Jun
vertigo6–13-0.0733%7 Jun
vertigo1–2-0.070%7 Jun
anubis13–100.0324%28 May
cache13–20.0129%23 May
train13–8-0.0228%22 Apr
ancient13–70.0029%26 Mar
dust213–40.0619%22 Mar
mirage13–90.0420%21 Mar
mirage13–50.0450%21 Mar
dust24–130.0129%16 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0421%15 Mar
dust27–130.0125%7 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0524%7 Mar
dust211–13-0.0126%11 Feb
vertigo13–30.0528%11 Feb
vertigo8–13-0.0318%11 Feb
office13–40.0025%22 Jan
dust22–10-0.0317%7 Jan
train13–7-0.0437%2 Jan
vertigo3–13-0.0328%20 Dec
train6–13-0.0324%5 Nov
inferno13–11-0.0640%21 Oct
nuke13–11-0.0342%21 Oct
ancient0–13-0.1233%21 Oct
overpass13–9-0.0222%10 Oct
ancient13–50.0122%5 Oct
inferno13–6-0.0831%30 Sept
inferno13–2-0.058%30 Sept
dust214–16-0.0226%26 Sept
ancient10–130.0321%25 Sept
overpass13–11-0.0623%24 Sept
dust213–11-0.0521%23 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0221%19 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0036%19 Sept
dust216–130.0429%18 Sept
overpass0–7-0.0225%15 Sept
mirage13–60.0113%12 Sept
overpass9–13-0.0412%10 Sept
overpass3–130.0636%4 Sept
nuke13–80.0219%3 Sept
dust26–13-0.049%28 Aug
grail4–10.0833%27 Aug
ancient10–130.0132%27 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0218%26 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0441%20 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0823%20 Aug
dust26–13-0.0538%20 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0028%15 Aug
train4–130.0433%15 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0430%6 Aug
overpass9–13-0.0323%5 Aug
train13–6-0.0238%4 Aug
dust213–40.0012%4 Aug
mirage10–130.0114%2 Aug
jura7–13-0.0820%30 Jul
overpass6–13-0.0633%30 Jul
overpass12–16-0.0731%29 Jul
overpass7–130.0125%28 Jul
nuke5–130.0627%27 Jul
ancient10–130.0144%26 Jul
mirage13–50.0225%26 Jul
inferno13–60.0230%16 Jul
train10–13-0.0624%16 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0118%13 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0432%10 Jul
dust27–13-0.0630%10 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0527%5 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0111%4 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0712%3 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0325%2 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0521%2 Jul
anubis28–240.0515%1 Jul
anubis13–50.0221%26 Jun
inferno13–50.0526%18 Jun
dust213–70.0330%17 Jun
agency5–130.0138%17 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0614%16 Jun
ancient16–12-0.0028%13 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0715%11 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0322%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →