Metaphysic Penguin — CS2 Stats

76561198085211183[U:1:124945455]

1,053Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,509Purple band · top ~14.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25488 of 55289 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMetaphysic PenguinFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,509 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning42
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48466Last 10048%Win rateWLLLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression4.5
Utility2.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.2
Utility2.4
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time563ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy11.7%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 11.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 13–7
133Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28151354%-0.01
mirageB24121250%-0.03
nukeC1771041%-0.01
cacheB126650%-0.02
anubisD93633%-0.03
overpassA53260%-0.01
inferno2020%-0.03
shelter110100%-0.02
boulder1010%-0.02
office110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

79Matches
48%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2654%1.1817.8
Anubis1155%1.1715.8
Nuke1060%0.9515.0
Inferno944%0.8614.8
Ancient838%1.2217.5
Vertigo729%0.9919.4
Overpass333%0.7719.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.3%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
551msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.29Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
7.37HE damage / grenade
2.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.3312% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2866 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5355% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0115%30 Aug
dust29–13-0.0511%29 Aug
nuke11–130.0210%29 Aug
mirage10–13-0.058%29 Aug
dust25–13-0.033%29 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0211%29 Aug
cache13–160.0115%29 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0515%27 Aug
dust29–13-0.0814%27 Aug
shelter13–7-0.0210%27 Aug
boulder12–12-0.027%27 Aug
office13–8-0.0413%27 Aug
cache13–8-0.038%26 Aug
mirage13–5-0.033%26 Aug
dust213–50.0711%26 Aug
nuke15–150.0312%26 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0416%25 Aug
dust213–5-0.0010%25 Aug
nuke13–60.0522%25 Aug
dust24–13-0.0012%25 Aug
anubis10–13-0.046%25 Aug
mirage14–160.014%24 Aug
mirage13–110.0015%24 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0024%24 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0412%24 Aug
dust213–5-0.0410%23 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0313%23 Aug
mirage13–5-0.037%23 Aug
cache8–13-0.0713%23 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0711%23 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0316%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0319%21 Aug
mirage13–100.0315%21 Aug
anubis7–13-0.1313%21 Aug
dust213–50.0414%21 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0118%21 Aug
cache13–80.0323%21 Aug
dust213–7-0.017%21 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0320%19 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0120%19 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0317%19 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0513%19 Aug
cache13–100.0211%19 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0417%23 Jun
overpass14–160.0014%23 Jun
mirage10–13-0.066%23 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0715%10 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0713%10 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0811%10 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0017%10 Jun
dust27–13-0.0820%8 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0714%8 Jun
mirage15–150.019%8 Jun
dust213–30.0315%8 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0316%24 May
dust216–13-0.0011%24 May
dust213–6-0.0311%24 May
mirage11–13-0.0411%24 May
overpass14–16-0.0117%24 May
mirage13–11-0.0620%24 May
nuke15–150.0618%24 May
cache12–12-0.0714%18 May
dust213–90.0013%18 May
anubis13–80.0811%18 May
dust213–5-0.0223%18 May
dust28–13-0.0310%18 May
mirage13–110.0113%10 May
dust213–110.0317%10 May
overpass13–70.0217%10 May
dust210–13-0.0120%10 May
cache5–13-0.0616%7 May
anubis9–13-0.0211%7 May
mirage13–50.0314%7 May
nuke13–90.0411%7 May
overpass13–6-0.0515%7 May
nuke13–8-0.0511%7 May
dust213–11-0.0316%7 May
dust28–13-0.0323%4 May
nuke13–30.009%4 May
cache11–130.0414%4 May
mirage11–130.0211%4 May
mirage8–13-0.044%3 May
dust213–70.0925%3 May
anubis6–13-0.0624%3 May
mirage13–10-0.0527%3 May
inferno10–13-0.0215%2 May
overpass13–6-0.0313%2 May
dust215–15-0.0315%2 May
dust27–13-0.0222%2 May
dust213–10-0.0220%2 May
mirage13–10-0.0612%2 May
dust210–13-0.057%2 May
cache13–5-0.0413%2 May
nuke10–130.0216%2 May
inferno6–13-0.0429%2 May
dust210–13-0.0526%29 Apr
cache13–80.0217%29 Apr
cache8–13-0.069%29 Apr
cache13–10-0.059%29 Apr
dust214–16-0.0414%28 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →