Neopolitan

Neopolitan — CS2 Stats

76561198084810546[U:1:124544818]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,169Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,840Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,507 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,507 → 1,507
+4Tracked matches · now 1,169
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 23 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,643 -2,050 23 May27 Jun · 18 days played
15,64319,784peak 19,78423 May27 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,507 +0 30 Aug20 Sept · 3 observations
1,5071,507peak 1,50730 Aug20 Sept
19,923Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,507Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-05-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,507
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 24 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches251+24
Win rate36%0%+36pp
K/D0.842.39−1.54
Headshot %66%89%−23pp

Measured 13 Sep 202622 Sep 2026; previous 10 Sep 2026 → 13 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,070), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate59.0%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy9.4%12.7%13.0%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.161.051.06above
Match win rate44.7%45.7%46.3%1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNeopolitanFACEITLevel 7 · 1,507 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,507csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning61
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46513Last 10046%Win rateWLLLLLTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.08 avg rating · −7.2pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.8

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.1
Utility5.6
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time565ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy25.8%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 27.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 3 Sept
58%Best headshot accuracy · 3–9 · nuke, 15 Jun
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 15 Sept
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 3 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
128In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 13anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2291341%0.00
nukeC1871139%-0.03
ancientB179853%0.01
dust2A138562%0.03
infernoC125742%-0.01
anubisD72529%0.00
overpass41325%-0.03
poseidon31233%0.03
cache220100%-0.03
eldorado220100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,304Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
3,166Matches
44.7%Match win rate
59.0%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 7 players
9.4%Shot accuracy
9,760MVPs
3,840Hours (in match)
2,845Bombs planted
1,166Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,867
AWP6,613
P901,922
Knife1,672
MP91,221

Lifetime map wins

6,487dust2
2,840inferno
2,432nuke
824train
271cbble
130lake
121vertigo
80office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

469Matches
53%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
77.9ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13444%1.0815.1
Ancient9863%1.1916.9
Nuke6263%1.1015.4
Dust24949%1.1316.4
Inferno4360%1.2117.1
Anubis3348%1.0715.6
Overpass2250%1.2716.9
Cache812%0.9819.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
89.6%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
579msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
58.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
8.95HE damage / grenade
8.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.615% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon9–50.0125%21 Sept
inferno6–9-0.0629%21 Sept
ancient6–130.0117%20 Sept
inferno1–9-0.270%18 Sept
poseidon6–90.0042%18 Sept
inferno10–130.0130%15 Sept
poseidon8–80.1028%15 Sept
inferno9–5-0.0830%15 Sept
nuke4–9-0.0213%15 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0611%15 Sept
ancient16–190.0015%13 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0122%13 Sept
mirage6–130.0846%7 Sept
dust213–110.0129%3 Sept
mirage13–20.2036%3 Sept
ancient13–30.0936%23 Aug
mirage13–110.0334%20 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0130%19 Aug
nuke13–70.0424%19 Aug
mirage13–70.0625%18 Aug
mirage13–40.0334%15 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0517%15 Aug
cache13–100.0232%13 Aug
inferno6–130.0325%5 Aug
dust26–13-0.0424%5 Aug
ancient13–50.0318%3 Aug
inferno13–10.1024%3 Aug
mirage16–140.0027%31 Jul
dust213–50.1429%29 Jul
mirage13–110.0733%29 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0233%23 Jul
ancient13–100.0718%21 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0717%20 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0119%19 Jul
ancient13–90.0135%16 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0836%16 Jul
eldorado9–70.0924%11 Jul
eldorado9–4-0.0228%11 Jul
dust26–130.0124%11 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0224%8 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0018%7 Jul
ancient11–130.0626%7 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0527%6 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0139%28 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0134%28 Jun
dust24–130.0148%28 Jun
mirage7–70.0039%27 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0034%27 Jun
nuke13–90.0336%26 Jun
overpass13–80.0238%25 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0225%24 Jun
dust210–13-0.0425%24 Jun
nuke13–90.0224%24 Jun
dust213–7-0.0625%23 Jun
inferno9–50.0514%23 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0928%23 Jun
anubis11–130.0638%21 Jun
inferno9–60.1439%21 Jun
nuke8–80.0232%21 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0332%21 Jun
dust216–140.0222%18 Jun
dust21–13-0.0723%17 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0628%17 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0038%17 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0448%17 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0431%16 Jun
overpass9–130.0022%16 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0320%15 Jun
inferno4–9-0.0657%15 Jun
nuke3–9-0.1058%15 Jun
nuke5–9-0.1018%13 Jun
inferno9–40.0732%13 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0530%13 Jun
nuke14–160.0643%10 Jun
nuke6–13-0.130%10 Jun
ancient7–13-0.067%9 Jun
ancient4–130.0719%9 Jun
inferno8–130.0230%8 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0423%8 Jun
mirage13–90.0640%8 Jun
dust213–90.0722%7 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0431%7 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0957%6 Jun
ancient13–100.0331%5 Jun
ancient10–13-0.056%5 Jun
dust213–10.1927%4 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0524%1 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0231%31 May
anubis10–13-0.0229%31 May
ancient13–9-0.0524%31 May
nuke13–110.0228%28 May
ancient13–8-0.0236%28 May
dust216–130.0216%28 May
anubis13–90.1424%28 May
mirage5–13-0.0630%28 May
mirage15–15-0.0523%26 May
cache13–5-0.0915%25 May
mirage11–13-0.0019%25 May
dust213–110.0730%23 May
nuke10–13-0.0819%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →