Verdin

Verdin — CS2 Stats

76561198080847670[U:1:120581942]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,010Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,164Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79682 of 257853 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,010 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,164 -1,704 21 Jun – 18 Oct · 34 days played
19,98424,010peak 24,01021 Jun18 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,735 +0 3 Sept – 18 Oct · 4 observations
1,7351,735peak 1,7353 Sept18 Oct
24,386Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,735Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-06-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,735
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 16 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,846 below peak (24,010)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • -2,330 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,836 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVerdinPREMIER20,164 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,735csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning68
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateWLLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.4pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.5
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.8
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time554ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy33.4%+7.5%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 33.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 28 Aug →
64%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · inferno, 28 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 29 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 28 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 61% over 18anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1811–761%0.02
infernoA1710–759%0.04
nukeB147–750%0.03
cacheB147–750%0.02
anubisC135–838%-0.01
dust2B126–650%0.02
mirageC73–443%-0.00
overpass—42–250%-0.01
fachwerk—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,938Matches
51%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
79.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8048%1.2317.4
Anubis7254%1.2517.5
Nuke6359%1.5118.1
Inferno5946%1.4417.6
Mirage5845%1.0816.1
Vertigo4342%1.3218.9
Train2241%1.2016.8
Dust22152%1.2014.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

33.7%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
541msReaction time
44.8%T opening success
51.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
10.17HE damage / grenade
8.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.1335%17 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0626%17 Sept →
dust27–130.0248%11 Sept →
ancient6–130.0130%10 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0240%30 Aug →
ancient13–90.0536%30 Aug →
cache11–130.0534%30 Aug →
inferno13–90.0822%30 Aug →
ancient7–130.0233%29 Aug →
inferno13–30.0230%29 Aug →
nuke13–70.0931%29 Aug →
inferno13–40.1564%28 Aug →
mirage13–10.0526%28 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0338%28 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0541%27 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0449%26 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0536%26 Aug →
inferno13–40.1444%26 Aug →
inferno13–40.0834%26 Aug →
nuke16–140.0326%24 Aug →
inferno13–90.0229%24 Aug →
nuke9–130.0441%24 Aug →
cache13–50.0328%16 Aug →
anubis13–110.0137%13 Aug →
ancient13–90.0829%12 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0025%12 Aug →
inferno8–130.0733%12 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0225%12 Aug →
mirage6–130.0115%1 Aug →
nuke13–160.0433%1 Aug →
nuke15–150.0435%30 Jul →
ancient7–130.0225%30 Jul →
nuke9–130.0023%29 Jul →
dust25–130.0533%29 Jul →
ancient0–2-0.030%29 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.0127%29 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0620%28 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0740%28 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0052%28 Jul →
dust213–3-0.0141%28 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0023%28 Jul →
anubis13–20.0132%26 Jul →
inferno8–130.0323%26 Jul →
cache13–80.0137%25 Jul →
cache13–70.0447%25 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0030%24 Jul →
cache13–110.0128%24 Jul →
anubis9–130.0522%24 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0125%23 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0314%23 Jul →
cache13–60.0326%23 Jul →
fachwerk13–110.0138%22 Jul →
ancient13–70.0828%21 Jul →
anubis7–130.0121%21 Jul →
ancient13–70.0028%21 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0027%21 Jul →
mirage13–60.0327%21 Jul →
dust213–100.0537%17 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0618%16 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0723%16 Jul →
nuke12–16-0.0527%16 Jul →
nuke13–50.0117%16 Jul →
ancient13–80.1044%16 Jul →
cache13–100.0129%15 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0620%15 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0221%15 Jul →
dust210–130.0326%15 Jul →
inferno13–70.0933%15 Jul →
dust29–130.0231%14 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.0426%14 Jul →
mirage13–80.0132%14 Jul →
anubis8–130.0531%14 Jul →
cache11–130.0620%9 Jul →
ancient13–40.0316%8 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0524%6 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0115%6 Jul →
dust27–130.0825%6 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.066%6 Jul →
dust213–100.0329%5 Jul →
inferno13–40.0644%5 Jul →
nuke13–100.0627%5 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0130%5 Jul →
overpass13–9-0.0219%5 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0220%5 Jul →
cache6–130.0636%3 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0523%3 Jul →
inferno9–130.0538%3 Jul →
overpass13–90.0227%3 Jul →
cache13–50.1128%29 Jun →
overpass8–130.0319%28 Jun →
ancient13–80.0425%26 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0223%26 Jun →
nuke13–110.0417%26 Jun →
inferno8–130.0639%25 Jun →
anubis16–120.0136%24 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.079%23 Jun →
dust213–60.0327%22 Jun →
ancient13–100.0227%22 Jun →
ancient13–90.0931%22 Jun →
overpass9–13-0.0720%21 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.