ΙƎ

ΙƎ — CS2 Stats

MC76561198080663214[U:1:120397486]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

183Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 183 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 63 days played since 27 Jun 2022. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

63Days played since 2022-06-27

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGΙƎFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning55
Utility12

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53407Last 10053%Win rateLLLLLLWTWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 736ms

Last 10

  • 262 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 658ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility1.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.1

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning5.5
Utility1.2
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time644ms+40ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–0 · inferno, 29 Apr
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · nuke, 31 Mar
422msFastest reaction time · 16–8 · inferno, 9 Jul
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 29 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L6Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB179853%-0.00
mirageA169756%-0.01
nukeB147750%-0.02
overpassS128467%0.01
dust2D113827%-0.02
anubisB105550%-0.02
vertigoC73443%0.01
ancientS64267%-0.02
trainS65183%-0.00
tuscan1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

365Matches
52%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
29.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
655msReaction time
41.5%T opening success
39.7%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
9.01HE damage / grenade
0.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3389 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.6521% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0522%8 Apr
dust28–13-0.037%3 Apr
nuke7–13-0.056%3 Apr
mirage11–130.0123%31 Mar
nuke1–13-0.1150%31 Mar
inferno11–13-0.047%30 Mar
nuke13–6-0.035%2 Mar
anubis15–150.0113%12 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0321%2 Feb
dust215–15-0.0616%2 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0326%7 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0910%7 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0519%9 Feb
inferno13–110.0113%9 Feb
train13–80.017%8 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0429%8 Feb
inferno13–40.0211%8 Feb
dust211–13-0.0424%6 Feb
vertigo13–70.0113%6 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0742%6 Feb
inferno12–120.0118%6 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0717%5 Feb
overpass13–70.0435%5 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0418%5 Feb
mirage16–130.0221%5 Feb
dust213–10-0.0617%3 Feb
inferno11–3-0.0021%3 Feb
inferno11–130.0129%30 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0514%29 Jan
anubis13–80.0233%29 Jan
ancient13–40.0032%21 Jan
train7–130.009%21 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0423%18 Jan
dust24–13-0.0515%18 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0412%18 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0520%13 Jan
train13–9-0.0738%13 Jan
dust212–12-0.0112%12 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0323%12 Jan
mirage13–11-0.1127%11 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0630%4 Jan
vertigo13–10.0115%4 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0216%4 Jan
nuke12–12-0.0423%3 Jan
ancient13–50.017%3 Jan
mirage13–80.0830%2 Jan
train13–1-0.0229%2 Jan
dust213–110.0024%2 Jan
mirage13–1-0.056%1 Jan
inferno13–50.0427%1 Jan
vertigo6–13-0.0622%1 Jan
overpass13–30.0721%1 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0120%1 Jan
anubis3–13-0.0720%30 Dec
nuke13–2-0.0426%30 Dec
anubis13–11-0.0324%29 Dec
overpass13–11-0.048%29 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0622%28 Dec
nuke13–50.0123%26 Dec
train13–5-0.0026%26 Dec
dust213–30.0233%26 Dec
ancient0–13-0.0724%22 Jul
overpass5–130.0120%6 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0015%16 Jun
inferno13–00.1324%29 Apr
nuke13–40.0617%18 Apr
overpass9–13-0.044%9 Apr
vertigo13–50.1325%8 Apr
anubis0–9-0.067%7 Apr
nuke11–130.1016%6 Apr
overpass13–60.0314%3 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0720%1 Apr
anubis13–10-0.026%28 Mar
anubis3–3-0.0021%26 Mar
mirage13–20.1017%23 Mar
ancient13–100.0113%23 Mar
overpass13–30.0818%20 Mar
mirage12–20.0020%17 Mar
dust29–130.0120%13 Mar
inferno13–00.0512%2 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0022%26 Feb
anubis4–130.0218%25 Feb
overpass13–4-0.007%28 Sept
overpass16–80.0420%23 Mar
vertigo15–150.0114%22 Mar
tuscan8–160.0121%16 Mar
vertigo10–160.0215%19 Feb
mirage15–150.0920%15 Feb
inferno6–16-0.0122%12 Feb
dust28–160.0225%30 Jan
mirage16–90.0016%25 Jan
inferno7–16-0.0728%6 Jan
nuke12–160.0511%4 Jan
overpass16–12-0.0516%9 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0114%9 Jul
inferno16–8-0.037%9 Jul
vertigo13–16-0.027%8 Jul
train16–40.0613%28 Jun
overpass10–160.0015%28 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0910%27 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →