alpha — CS2 Stats

76561198079066793[U:1:118801065]

3,132Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,838Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#69461 of 252097 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,651 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,838 -2,115 1 Sept – 14 Oct · 24 days played
20,75923,618peak 23,6181 Sept14 Oct
23,880Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,651Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,651
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 100 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,780 below peak (23,618)
  • -2,486 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,162 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGalphaFACEITLevel 9 · 1,651 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,838 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,651csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning58
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateLWLWTLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility6.2
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.8
Utility6.2
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time526ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 500ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 7–13 · nuke, 8 Oct →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · inferno, 13 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · nuke, 9 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 16infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C218–1338%-0.01
mirageB199–1047%-0.00
ancientA169–756%0.00
cacheB158–753%0.01
nukeC114–736%0.02
infernoD103–730%0.02
anubisB84–450%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

445Matches
53%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
86.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210149%1.0516.8
Mirage8544%1.0215.9
Inferno5853%1.0415.3
Nuke4166%1.2618.0
Ancient3063%1.2217.0
Anubis3057%1.2318.9
Cache1958%1.1417.3
Train667%1.1318.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
68.0%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
529msReaction time
45.7%T opening success
38.3%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
7.98HE damage / grenade
14.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.2562% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–130.0120%14 Oct →
anubis13–100.0218%14 Oct →
ancient11–130.0115%13 Oct →
mirage13–60.0712%13 Oct →
inferno8–80.0232%13 Oct →
cache4–130.0218%12 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0417%9 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0016%9 Oct →
dust27–130.0129%9 Oct →
mirage5–130.0021%9 Oct →
cache8–130.0512%8 Oct →
dust213–20.0211%8 Oct →
inferno13–60.1018%8 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.029%8 Oct →
ancient13–90.0315%8 Oct →
nuke7–130.1222%8 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0116%8 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0422%8 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0323%7 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.076%7 Oct →
dust213–100.0126%7 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0116%7 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0117%7 Oct →
nuke13–110.0516%7 Oct →
inferno7–130.0515%7 Oct →
mirage13–110.0114%7 Oct →
dust27–13-0.008%7 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0413%6 Oct →
inferno13–110.0227%6 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0325%6 Oct →
cache13–50.0622%6 Oct →
ancient13–60.0014%6 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0117%6 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0410%5 Oct →
ancient16–140.0217%5 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0124%4 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0411%4 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0617%4 Oct →
ancient13–100.0215%4 Oct →
ancient13–40.0623%4 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.096%3 Oct →
dust28–130.0223%3 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0517%3 Oct →
cache16–13-0.0113%3 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0217%3 Oct →
cache13–80.0219%3 Oct →
dust213–50.0225%3 Oct →
cache13–80.0523%2 Oct →
cache13–5-0.013%2 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0020%2 Oct →
anubis13–80.1118%2 Oct →
nuke13–30.1017%2 Oct →
inferno7–130.0221%2 Oct →
ancient15–150.0115%29 Sept →
cache13–110.0419%29 Sept →
anubis13–70.0118%29 Sept →
mirage13–110.1123%29 Sept →
anubis10–130.0113%29 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0419%29 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0413%28 Sept →
cache13–110.0820%28 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0625%28 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0224%28 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0513%27 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0118%27 Sept →
mirage13–90.0720%27 Sept →
cache13–9-0.063%27 Sept →
inferno10–130.0627%27 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0514%26 Sept →
cache13–160.0415%26 Sept →
nuke13–60.0511%25 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0518%25 Sept →
mirage0–3-0.070%25 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0117%25 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0316%25 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0820%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0822%23 Sept →
nuke13–60.0526%23 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0713%23 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0613%23 Sept →
dust213–70.0421%22 Sept →
ancient13–70.0021%19 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0422%19 Sept →
ancient10–130.0322%19 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0217%19 Sept →
mirage13–70.1217%19 Sept →
ancient11–130.0318%19 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0614%18 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0613%18 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0018%18 Sept →
mirage13–40.0220%17 Sept →
dust213–110.0416%17 Sept →
mirage13–80.0422%17 Sept →
inferno13–100.0319%17 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.017%17 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0010%17 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0318%17 Sept →
inferno8–130.0217%17 Sept →
dust210–130.0316%16 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0514%15 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.