Notorious M.A.C

Notorious M.A.C — CS2 Stats

IE76561198077145918[U:1:116880190]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

955Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating20,961Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#71223 of 261589 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (63 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,961 +513 16 Aug – 12 Sept · 19 days played
19,54022,204peak 22,20416 Aug12 Sept
22,204Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-08-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,243 below peak (22,204)
  • +513 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,039 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNotorious M.A.CFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,961 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning58
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateTLLLLWLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · +4ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 2–6–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 8–9–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility6.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning5.8
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time536ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 500ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 15–15 · mirage, 28 Aug →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · inferno, 24 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · mirage, 2 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 26 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 31infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS3121–1068%0.03
anubisB2010–1050%0.02
dust2A1610–663%0.01
nukeD124–833%0.02
ancientC73–443%0.01
infernoD61–517%-0.01
cache—40–40%0.01
office—31–233%0.03
fachwerk—10–10%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

223Matches
53%Win rate
1.39Avg K/D
97.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo10%1.0015.0
Inferno1100%2.3831.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
44.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
51.1%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
530msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
9.57HE damage / grenade
16.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.9488% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0724%12 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0212%6 Sept →
office10–130.019%5 Sept →
fachwerk11–130.0633%5 Sept →
office10–13-0.0219%5 Sept →
office13–60.0924%5 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0411%4 Sept →
anubis13–70.0719%4 Sept →
nuke15–150.1225%4 Sept →
nuke6–130.0119%4 Sept →
mirage13–110.0123%4 Sept →
anubis13–100.0818%3 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0418%3 Sept →
mirage13–80.0820%3 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0416%3 Sept →
anubis3–130.0517%3 Sept →
anubis7–130.0324%3 Sept →
mirage13–70.1331%2 Sept →
mirage13–110.0523%2 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0319%2 Sept →
dust213–100.0023%2 Sept →
mirage13–100.0617%2 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0218%2 Sept →
mirage7–130.0014%2 Sept →
dust213–110.0315%2 Sept →
cache6–130.0019%2 Sept →
mirage13–110.0317%31 Aug →
mirage15–150.0611%30 Aug →
anubis13–90.0819%30 Aug →
cache8–130.0320%30 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.028%30 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0720%28 Aug →
mirage15–150.2030%28 Aug →
ancient14–160.039%28 Aug →
nuke13–60.0630%28 Aug →
anubis5–130.0221%28 Aug →
inferno14–160.0421%27 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0426%27 Aug →
anubis13–90.0417%27 Aug →
nuke13–100.1021%27 Aug →
dust213–60.0426%27 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0133%26 Aug →
dust213–10.0917%26 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0025%26 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0615%26 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0127%26 Aug →
mirage13–00.0433%26 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0317%26 Aug →
mirage13–40.0027%26 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.018%26 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0118%25 Aug →
anubis13–50.0324%25 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0517%25 Aug →
dust213–20.1419%25 Aug →
nuke0–13-0.129%25 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0912%25 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0122%25 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0113%24 Aug →
mirage13–50.1021%24 Aug →
mirage13–80.0115%24 Aug →
inferno7–130.0340%24 Aug →
mirage13–70.0113%24 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0514%24 Aug →
anubis13–50.0211%24 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0722%24 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0321%24 Aug →
mirage13–80.0112%24 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.0412%24 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.027%22 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0213%22 Aug →
anubis13–70.0323%22 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0420%22 Aug →
anubis5–130.0015%22 Aug →
mirage13–10.0226%22 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0219%21 Aug →
mirage16–140.0114%20 Aug →
mirage13–30.1024%20 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0018%20 Aug →
dust216–130.0025%20 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.027%20 Aug →
anubis13–110.0110%20 Aug →
nuke13–80.0521%20 Aug →
dust25–130.0329%20 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0014%20 Aug →
anubis13–80.0424%19 Aug →
dust213–110.0421%19 Aug →
nuke8–130.0522%19 Aug →
mirage13–70.1816%19 Aug →
ancient13–70.0626%19 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0914%19 Aug →
cache1–130.029%19 Aug →
ancient13–20.0415%19 Aug →
mirage13–50.0320%19 Aug →
nuke13–10.0722%18 Aug →
anubis9–130.0820%18 Aug →
dust213–80.0320%18 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0430%18 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0523%18 Aug →
anubis10–130.0412%18 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0224%16 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.