1NoVa — CS2 Stats
76561198074927301[U:1:114661573]
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 2,216
- Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 284 to go
- Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
- Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
- Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
Premier CS Rating
- At peak — 7,389
- Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 2,611 to go
- Reached: Light Blue band
- Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 48.2% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 16.9% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.88 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 41.2% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimer
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 36 | 20–16 | 56% | 0.01 | |
| C | 21 | 9–12 | 43% | -0.00 | |
| B | 13 | 7–6 | 54% | -0.01 | |
| C | 9 | 4–5 | 44% | -0.02 | |
| B | 8 | 4–4 | 50% | -0.00 | |
| B | 6 | 3–3 | 50% | 0.02 | |
| — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | -0.01 | |
| — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.04 | |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 404 | 56% | 1.08 | 15.8 |
| Anubis | 179 | 54% | 0.96 | 14.9 |
| Dust2 | 170 | 49% | 1.02 | 15.8 |
| Ancient | 167 | 45% | 0.97 | 15.0 |
| Nuke | 122 | 48% | 1.08 | 14.7 |
| Inferno | 72 | 49% | 1.05 | 15.4 |
| Overpass | 63 | 52% | 1.00 | 14.5 |
| Vertigo | 41 | 34% | 0.92 | 15.2 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.499 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 10% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.00 | 29% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.03 | 33% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 21% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.03 | 23% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 8% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.07 | 22% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.06 | 38% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.04 | 42% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 19–17 | -0.01 | 29% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.06 | 17% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 36% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.06 | 39% | 15 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 18% | 10 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.04 | 29% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.00 | 26% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 22–20 | 0.02 | 38% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 24% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 34% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 32% | 5 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.04 | 16% | 1 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 33% | 1 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.08 | 26% | 1 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 29% | 19 May → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 29% | 18 May → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.01 | 24% | 18 May → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.08 | 38% | 17 May → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.00 | 7% | 12 May → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 23% | 8 May → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 33% | 7 May → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.02 | 45% | 4 May → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 42% | 2 May → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.08 | 23% | 1 May → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.06 | 33% | 1 May → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.06 | 29% | 30 Apr → | ||
| 1–13 | 0.02 | 27% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 31% | 23 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 31% | 21 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 56% | 20 Apr → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 26% | 14 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 32% | 14 Apr → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.02 | 27% | 11 Apr → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 56% | 8 Apr → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.02 | 24% | 28 Mar → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 11% | 28 Mar → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 28 Mar → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 14% | 28 Mar → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.03 | 36% | 28 Mar → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 16% | 16 Mar → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.03 | 31% | 16 Mar → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 13% | 16 Mar → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 40% | 15 Mar → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.00 | 28% | 14 Mar → | ||
| 19–17 | -0.04 | 14% | 13 Mar → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 33% | 10 Mar → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.09 | 35% | 10 Mar → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.07 | 21% | 8 Mar → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 38% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.03 | 38% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 19–17 | 0.01 | 40% | 23 Feb → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.03 | 31% | 23 Feb → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 18% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.07 | 32% | 20 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 23% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.03 | 30% | 2 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.00 | 13% | 15 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 22% | 14 Jan → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.02 | 62% | 12 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 20% | 12 Jan → | ||
| 19–22 | -0.02 | 40% | 11 Jan → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.07 | 58% | 7 Jan → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 33% | 29 Dec → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.00 | 35% | 28 Dec → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.07 | 15% | 28 Dec → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 23 Dec → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.00 | 25% | 23 Dec → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.02 | 32% | 29 Nov → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.02 | 11% | 26 Nov → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 42% | 24 Nov → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.04 | 21% | 16 Nov → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 19% | 16 Nov → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.00 | 14% | 14 Nov → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.00 | 25% | 13 Nov → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 22% | 13 Nov → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.03 | 40% | 8 Nov → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.08 | 23% | 8 Nov → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.00 | 12% | 8 Nov → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.04 | 20% | 8 Nov → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.00 | 17% | 8 Nov → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 32% | 7 Nov → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 27% | 5 Nov → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.00 | 33% | 4 Nov → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 3 Nov → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 40% | 31 Oct → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 48% | 28 Oct → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.00 | 12% | 1 Oct → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 25% | 30 Sept → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.05 | 31% | 28 Sept → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.07 | 16% | 28 Sept → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 33% | 28 Sept → |
Match data via Leetify.