Charlie Osswald — CS2 Stats

76561198074785131[U:1:114519403]

2,446Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,673Blue band · top ~40.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11326 of 16195 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCharlie OsswaldFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,673 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning58
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49465Last 10049%Win rateWWWWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression6.5
Utility3.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch6.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 717ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.8
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time725ms+55ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 725ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 13–4
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B40182245%-0.01
anubisA116555%-0.01
cacheA117464%-0.02
ancientA116555%-0.02
mirageA95456%-0.04
nukeB84450%-0.01
infernoD71614%-0.03
overpass32167%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

163Matches
54%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
76.0ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1020%1.1014.0
Mirage757%1.0713.3
Overpass786%1.4715.9
Nuke650%0.8414.7
Anubis475%0.7913.8
Vertigo367%0.8712.0
Dust21100%1.0022.0
Inferno10%0.251.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
717msReaction time
35.4%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
7.93HE damage / grenade
4.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 717.2885ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.4234% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0111%24 Aug
anubis13–50.0822%24 Aug
cache13–8-0.0318%23 Aug
cache13–70.0711%23 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0420%23 Aug
dust23–13-0.0417%23 Aug
dust213–10.0529%19 Aug
dust213–80.0424%19 Aug
cache8–13-0.0327%4 Aug
nuke13–2-0.024%4 Aug
cache6–13-0.068%3 Aug
dust213–8-0.0128%3 Aug
dust24–13-0.0223%3 Aug
anubis10–130.0316%3 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0911%3 Aug
dust213–50.0525%2 Aug
cache13–60.0414%2 Aug
dust213–60.0221%2 Aug
dust215–15-0.0512%31 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0120%31 Jul
ancient13–30.0218%31 Jul
anubis10–13-0.016%28 Jul
cache16–14-0.0412%28 Jul
nuke9–130.0317%28 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0514%26 Jul
dust213–80.0223%26 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0029%26 Jul
dust27–13-0.0626%24 Jul
dust27–13-0.0116%24 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0912%24 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0313%22 Jul
dust29–13-0.0710%22 Jul
dust213–40.1615%22 Jul
dust27–130.0823%12 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0114%12 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0410%12 Jul
dust23–13-0.0817%9 Jul
ancient12–160.0110%9 Jul
cache13–11-0.058%9 Jul
dust211–130.0211%6 Jul
ancient13–50.0110%5 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0413%5 Jul
dust211–13-0.0315%5 Jul
dust27–13-0.0113%5 Jul
dust29–13-0.0118%14 Jun
inferno13–11-0.047%14 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0611%14 Jun
dust211–130.0126%13 Jun
ancient13–11-0.037%13 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0413%13 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0411%13 Jun
nuke12–30.0313%14 May
dust213–7-0.0824%14 May
cache6–13-0.0321%14 May
dust213–50.0236%14 May
cache9–13-0.049%30 Apr
cache13–3-0.0426%30 Apr
cache13–10-0.0110%30 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0117%23 Apr
ancient9–13-0.059%28 Mar
dust211–13-0.0114%25 Mar
anubis13–80.0411%25 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0015%20 Mar
dust211–130.0112%20 Mar
dust213–40.0314%20 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0212%13 Mar
dust213–9-0.0320%13 Mar
ancient13–30.069%13 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0517%13 Mar
dust28–130.0023%3 Mar
mirage13–5-0.069%3 Mar
ancient8–13-0.093%1 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0118%28 Feb
dust26–13-0.0617%28 Feb
dust211–13-0.0623%28 Feb
dust213–90.0221%27 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0320%27 Feb
inferno3–70.0371%22 Feb
dust213–5-0.0114%22 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0013%22 Feb
dust28–13-0.0333%21 Feb
dust213–50.0514%21 Feb
nuke13–70.0313%21 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0110%21 Feb
overpass10–13-0.049%20 Feb
dust27–13-0.0229%20 Feb
mirage13–9-0.066%16 Feb
anubis5–12-0.0824%16 Feb
inferno15–15-0.0413%15 Feb
dust28–13-0.0315%15 Feb
anubis13–110.0415%15 Feb
dust211–13-0.0714%13 Feb
mirage13–50.0518%13 Feb
inferno11–13-0.043%13 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0513%11 Feb
dust213–10-0.0013%11 Feb
anubis16–14-0.039%8 Feb
nuke3–13-0.0613%8 Feb
dust213–8-0.0520%7 Feb
dust213–11-0.0213%7 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →