Bot Counter Stronk

Bot Counter Stronk — CS2 Stats

76561198072387132[U:1:112121404]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

951Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,035Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating7,148Light Blue band · top ~68.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 597 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,148 -4,151 19 Apr – 12 Oct · 32 days played
6,36211,664peak 11,66419 Apr12 Oct
Faceit ELO: 597 +0 29 Aug – 2 Sept · 3 observations
597597peak 59729 Aug2 Sept
11,664Peak Premier in tracked matches
597Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-04-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 597
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 154 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,516 below peak (11,664)
  • -621 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,956 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 2,852 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,991), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate40.8%41.3%41.8%1.0% short
Shot accuracy10.9%12.7%12.2%1.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.890.950.980.09 short
Match win rate35.0%42.6%43.3%8.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 3 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBot Counter StronkFACEITLevel 2 · 597 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER7,148 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO597csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning52
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39–57–4Last 10039%Win rateLLLWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −47ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility5.2
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.2
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time609ms−103ms
first ⅓ avg 712ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–7 · vertigo, 29 Jul →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 1 Aug →
500msFastest reaction time · 14–16 · ancient, 21 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · cache, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 52% over 21ancientWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2111–1052%-0.02
mirageC187–1139%-0.01
cacheD144–1029%-0.01
nukeB136–746%0.00
infernoC125–742%-0.01
ancientD112–918%-0.03
anubisC52–340%-0.01
overpass—21–150%-0.04
vertigo—21–150%0.12
office—10–10%-0.02
shelter—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

56,075Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
2,878Matches
35.0%Match win rate
40.8%Headshot %
10.9%Shot accuracy
4,609MVPs
1,208Hours (in match)
2,291Bombs planted
588Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,579
AWP7,126
SSG 081,616
Knife1,349
P2501,251

Lifetime map wins

6,712dust2
2,911nuke
2,147inferno
566train
242cbble
73office
37vertigo
31italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

362Matches
45%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
73.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9758%1.0915.0
Dust26344%1.0214.0
Nuke5040%0.9614.5
Inferno4137%0.9112.9
Ancient4040%0.9313.3
Overpass1953%1.1812.3
Anubis1724%0.8412.0
Train1250%1.1215.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
608msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
9.01HE damage / grenade
14.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1604% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.3446% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–160.0413%12 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.066%11 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.069%11 Oct →
nuke13–110.0023%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0326%3 Oct →
office6–13-0.0219%3 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0919%2 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0117%2 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.040%2 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.016%21 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.008%20 Sept →
overpass13–110.019%19 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0616%19 Sept →
shelter2–13-0.0223%19 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.066%16 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0013%16 Sept →
overpass10–13-0.1014%4 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0316%4 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0030%4 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0320%4 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0412%3 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0213%2 Sept →
mirage13–30.0524%2 Sept →
inferno9–130.0317%2 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0621%2 Sept →
dust26–130.0214%1 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0310%30 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.059%30 Aug →
inferno13–60.035%28 Aug →
mirage10–130.0417%25 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0317%25 Aug →
dust213–50.0313%24 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.018%24 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0110%23 Aug →
dust213–90.0026%23 Aug →
anubis13–80.1228%22 Aug →
mirage13–110.0119%19 Aug →
nuke13–110.0921%19 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0013%19 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0013%18 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0623%12 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0314%9 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0310%9 Aug →
dust213–8-0.096%9 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0212%2 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0816%2 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0117%2 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0618%2 Aug →
cache9–13-0.079%2 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0023%1 Aug →
dust24–130.0024%1 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0919%1 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0338%1 Aug →
nuke13–80.1013%31 Jul →
cache13–50.0616%31 Jul →
cache11–130.0118%31 Jul →
vertigo13–70.1627%29 Jul →
inferno15–150.0218%28 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0313%26 Jul →
ancient8–130.0216%22 Jul →
ancient4–9-0.190%14 Jul →
mirage13–50.069%14 Jul →
cache13–40.1415%13 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0523%13 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.1022%12 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0719%12 Jul →
inferno13–100.0611%12 Jul →
dust213–50.0227%12 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0214%12 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0120%12 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0124%12 Jul →
cache6–130.0615%12 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0210%12 Jul →
dust213–70.1223%5 Jul →
dust213–11-0.019%5 Jul →
mirage15–150.029%4 Jul →
dust213–60.0015%4 Jul →
mirage12–160.0115%4 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0219%21 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0814%19 Jun →
nuke13–70.0027%19 Jun →
mirage13–60.0510%15 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0714%14 Jun →
mirage13–16-0.099%14 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0618%24 May →
vertigo12–120.0917%24 May →
cache6–13-0.069%24 May →
dust29–13-0.0811%23 May →
ancient2–13-0.1117%23 May →
ancient13–30.1226%20 May →
mirage5–130.0117%20 May →
inferno15–150.0120%18 May →
cache7–130.0018%18 May →
cache3–13-0.0516%18 May →
mirage5–13-0.089%22 Apr →
inferno13–80.0218%21 Apr →
mirage13–80.0121%19 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0013%19 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0416%19 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.077%19 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.