kahur

kahur — CS2 Stats

76561198072086203[U:1:111820475]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,082Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+18Tracked matches · now 1,082
0.0ppWin rate · 43.3% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 21 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,743 +3,436 21 Apr3 Jul · 30 days played
25,00029,530peak 29,53021 Apr3 Jul
29,631Peak Premier in tracked matches
50Days played since 2026-04-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkahurFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning57
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55423Last 10055%Win rateLWLWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · −46ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim9.1
Utility5.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time563ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 12 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–2 · ancient, 28 May
375msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 24 May
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 3 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 74% over 19infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC26111542%0.04
nukeS1914574%0.07
dust2B178947%0.05
ancientS1410471%0.06
cacheA95456%0.07
infernoD93633%0.05
anubisS64267%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

245Matches
61%Win rate
1.46Avg K/D
95.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5155%1.4217.0
Anubis3165%1.3218.3
Ancient2861%1.7218.5
Inferno2850%1.3017.2
Nuke2677%1.7619.4
Dust22467%1.7422.4
Vertigo2171%1.3315.2
Overpass956%1.2216.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.5%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
552msReaction time
30.5%T opening success
64.3%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
6.94HE damage / grenade
8.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.5215% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis3–130.0925%18 Sept
cache13–100.1315%17 Sept
dust210–13-0.0114%12 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0221%10 Sept
mirage13–30.0638%10 Sept
cache13–40.1032%10 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0127%27 Aug
nuke9–130.0727%26 Aug
mirage13–80.0225%26 Aug
mirage5–130.1433%24 Aug
dust212–160.0429%23 Aug
mirage11–130.1530%23 Aug
nuke13–20.0115%22 Aug
nuke10–130.0924%9 Aug
ancient13–70.1829%9 Aug
dust213–20.1126%8 Aug
cache7–130.1028%8 Aug
dust213–100.1629%5 Aug
ancient13–0-0.010%3 Jul
ancient6–13-0.008%24 Jun
nuke13–50.0719%13 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0228%8 Jun
inferno9–130.0010%3 Jun
mirage9–130.0315%3 Jun
nuke13–60.0136%2 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0323%28 May
dust211–130.0426%28 May
ancient1–20.0550%28 May
inferno8–13-0.0819%27 May
dust213–7-0.0335%27 May
nuke13–40.1522%26 May
mirage13–80.0021%25 May
nuke13–100.0525%25 May
inferno6–130.0421%24 May
mirage6–13-0.0124%24 May
ancient13–70.1120%23 May
mirage13–100.0323%23 May
inferno8–130.1126%22 May
inferno13–40.1024%22 May
dust213–70.0326%22 May
nuke13–30.1218%21 May
dust213–7-0.0110%21 May
anubis16–120.0126%21 May
dust210–130.0818%20 May
nuke13–100.0518%19 May
mirage4–13-0.0026%19 May
dust22–110.0726%18 May
mirage13–90.0318%17 May
nuke13–60.1429%17 May
ancient10–130.0927%16 May
anubis13–20.0613%16 May
mirage15–150.0219%15 May
anubis13–10-0.0413%14 May
dust27–130.0611%13 May
nuke16–130.1420%13 May
dust213–40.0829%12 May
ancient13–100.0213%12 May
dust213–20.1930%12 May
ancient13–40.0838%11 May
inferno13–110.1429%11 May
mirage13–60.0519%11 May
mirage11–130.0424%11 May
mirage6–13-0.0123%10 May
ancient16–130.0823%10 May
nuke13–70.0830%10 May
ancient16–140.0419%10 May
dust27–130.0220%9 May
dust210–130.0419%9 May
dust23–130.0014%8 May
cache13–50.0838%8 May
inferno8–130.0829%8 May
mirage9–130.0529%8 May
mirage13–90.0932%6 May
nuke7–130.0721%6 May
anubis22–190.0219%5 May
ancient13–40.0517%3 May
nuke13–30.1826%3 May
mirage13–60.1036%3 May
anubis6–130.0727%2 May
nuke13–80.0712%2 May
ancient13–80.0821%30 Apr
inferno13–100.0542%30 Apr
cache13–4-0.0421%30 Apr
mirage13–80.1135%30 Apr
ancient13–110.1032%30 Apr
cache13–60.0520%30 Apr
cache12–120.0725%29 Apr
mirage3–130.0321%29 Apr
cache8–130.0532%29 Apr
cache12–120.0623%29 Apr
mirage8–130.0619%28 Apr
nuke13–70.0432%28 Apr
dust213–70.0329%28 Apr
ancient7–130.0422%25 Apr
mirage13–4-0.026%25 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0317%25 Apr
mirage11–130.0318%24 Apr
nuke14–160.0323%22 Apr
mirage13–40.1325%22 Apr
inferno9–130.0117%21 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →