quantuM

quantuM — CS2 Stats

DE76561198070881302[U:1:110615574]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,442Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,438Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64114 of 259137 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,492 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,438 -182 18 Oct – 21 Oct · 2 days played
21,43821,620peak 21,62018 Oct21 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,492 +0 1 Sept – 1 Oct · 4 observations
1,4921,492peak 1,4921 Sept1 Oct
21,620Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,492Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,492
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 39 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 182 below peak (21,620)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,562 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGquantuMFACEITLevel 9 · 1,492 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,438 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,492csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning62
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateLWWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.9
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 53% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.2
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time532ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 29 Sept →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · nuke, 1 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · mirage, 11 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 9 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
14–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 15cacheWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B189–950%-0.01
cacheD165–1131%0.01
anubisS1611–569%0.03
mirageC167–944%0.00
ancientS1511–473%0.01
nukeA106–460%0.02
infernoC73–443%0.01
shelter—10–10%-0.11
vertigo—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,362Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
83.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient13446%1.0415.2
Anubis13055%1.1215.1
Mirage9453%1.0014.1
Overpass4238%0.8713.0
Vertigo4035%0.9013.8
Inferno3853%1.2115.9
Nuke2335%1.0117.4
Dust21547%0.9215.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
527msReaction time
53.0%T opening success
33.4%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
8.98HE damage / grenade
8.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.362% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–130.0228%21 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0319%18 Oct →
cache13–70.0622%18 Oct →
shelter2–13-0.1113%7 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0428%7 Oct →
inferno16–140.0217%7 Oct →
nuke10–130.0525%4 Oct →
cache7–13-0.053%4 Oct →
nuke13–60.1130%29 Sept →
nuke3–7-0.0438%28 Sept →
ancient13–90.0117%28 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0425%28 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0613%27 Sept →
cache13–50.0540%27 Sept →
anubis3–130.0327%24 Sept →
cache3–130.0128%22 Sept →
cache8–2-0.0314%22 Sept →
anubis13–60.0633%21 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0135%21 Sept →
dust23–10.0210%21 Sept →
cache7–130.0627%20 Sept →
nuke10–130.0121%20 Sept →
ancient13–110.0716%20 Sept →
inferno12–120.0432%20 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0313%20 Sept →
ancient13–30.0833%19 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0222%15 Sept →
anubis13–20.0211%15 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0220%15 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0411%15 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0324%10 Sept →
nuke13–160.0325%7 Sept →
dust216–130.0526%6 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0232%6 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0510%6 Sept →
ancient11–130.0423%6 Sept →
ancient12–160.0214%5 Sept →
mirage13–70.0130%5 Sept →
cache13–80.0517%5 Sept →
vertigo6–90.0227%5 Sept →
ancient13–110.0219%3 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0419%3 Sept →
mirage16–190.0123%3 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0018%1 Sept →
ancient11–130.0229%1 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0219%13 Aug →
mirage13–90.0329%13 Aug →
mirage13–60.0430%13 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0112%13 Aug →
anubis16–120.0521%13 Aug →
dust213–90.0219%12 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0315%12 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0312%12 Aug →
anubis13–80.0014%12 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0028%12 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0121%12 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0413%11 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0011%11 Aug →
nuke13–50.0824%11 Aug →
cache13–110.0417%11 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0528%10 Aug →
mirage10–130.0416%10 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0219%10 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0315%10 Aug →
mirage13–50.0223%9 Aug →
nuke13–110.0111%9 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0716%9 Aug →
ancient13–10.0231%9 Aug →
dust213–90.0928%8 Aug →
nuke13–110.0620%8 Aug →
inferno13–100.0125%8 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0222%8 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0330%6 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0515%6 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.045%6 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0323%6 Aug →
anubis13–90.0718%4 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0224%4 Aug →
anubis10–130.0120%4 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0125%3 Aug →
ancient13–70.0512%2 Aug →
cache10–130.0928%2 Aug →
dust213–100.0322%2 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0344%1 Aug →
anubis13–30.0928%1 Aug →
mirage3–30.0429%1 Aug →
inferno12–120.0428%1 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0942%1 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0416%28 Jul →
ancient16–140.0025%26 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0413%25 Jul →
mirage8–130.039%25 Jul →
dust24–130.0113%25 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0323%25 Jul →
anubis13–90.0717%25 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.028%25 Jul →
anubis13–10.0819%25 Jul →
anubis13–20.0325%25 Jul →
anubis13–70.0924%24 Jul →
cache11–130.0520%18 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.