nikz

nikz — CS2 Stats

NO76561198070327975[U:1:110062247]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,341Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,573Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#92996 of 261709 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,891 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,341 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,573 -2,447 7 Mar – 23 Oct · 11 days played
19,57322,707peak 22,7077 Mar23 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,891 +0 29 Sept – 23 Oct · 2 observations
1,8911,891peak 1,89129 Sept23 Oct
23,068Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,891Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-03-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,891
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 110 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-29
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,134 below peak (22,707)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 427 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnikzFACEITLevel 9 · 1,891 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,573 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,891csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning57
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–55Last 10045%Win rateWLLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +9.5pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.7
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time617ms+39ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 22 Mar →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · cache, 2 May →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 6 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 1 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 5overpassWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC239–1439%0.01
anubisA1911–858%0.01
ancientB157–847%0.01
overpassD133–1023%0.01
dust2C125–742%0.01
cacheA74–357%0.02
infernoB63–350%0.05
mirageA53–260%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

578Matches
54%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
86.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3557%1.2517.5
Nuke3557%1.1917.6
Overpass3456%1.3017.9
Anubis3155%1.1417.1
Vertigo1867%1.1117.9
Inferno1729%0.9917.3
Dust21443%1.2516.7
Mirage1040%1.1618.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
622msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
44.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
10.45HE damage / grenade
9.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1953% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–30.1229%23 May →
mirage9–130.0520%22 May →
cache9–13-0.0626%2 May →
cache13–60.0636%2 May →
cache13–50.0327%2 May →
cache9–130.0525%2 May →
cache13–20.0138%2 May →
cache10–13-0.0418%2 May →
cache13–30.1233%2 May →
ancient13–20.0831%21 Apr →
nuke13–30.0011%21 Apr →
overpass6–130.0521%21 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0411%21 Apr →
nuke7–130.0423%21 Apr →
inferno13–80.0126%21 Apr →
nuke5–130.0419%20 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0328%20 Apr →
overpass8–130.0111%8 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0127%8 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.059%6 Apr →
nuke10–130.0125%6 Apr →
dust214–16-0.0310%6 Apr →
anubis13–60.0617%6 Apr →
ancient13–40.0729%6 Apr →
nuke13–90.0624%6 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0413%6 Apr →
nuke13–70.0216%6 Apr →
ancient16–130.0217%6 Apr →
anubis13–100.0219%5 Apr →
nuke13–3-0.0323%5 Apr →
inferno13–60.0314%5 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0915%4 Apr →
anubis13–110.0412%4 Apr →
overpass14–160.0621%4 Apr →
ancient10–130.0117%4 Apr →
nuke16–19-0.0213%3 Apr →
overpass19–16-0.0219%3 Apr →
anubis8–130.0318%3 Apr →
nuke13–16-0.0013%2 Apr →
anubis13–30.1311%2 Apr →
inferno6–130.0316%2 Apr →
mirage13–90.0536%2 Apr →
ancient13–20.0321%2 Apr →
nuke10–130.0311%2 Apr →
overpass13–70.0723%2 Apr →
anubis6–13-0.0317%2 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0616%1 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0318%1 Apr →
anubis13–1-0.0316%1 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0413%1 Apr →
mirage13–80.0111%29 Mar →
ancient13–50.0720%29 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0019%29 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.0711%25 Mar →
anubis13–20.0415%25 Mar →
mirage12–20.1315%25 Mar →
nuke12–16-0.039%25 Mar →
inferno16–190.0123%23 Mar →
overpass13–90.0326%23 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0515%23 Mar →
anubis13–80.0321%23 Mar →
nuke16–130.0125%23 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0225%22 Mar →
inferno13–60.2028%22 Mar →
dust213–160.0218%22 Mar →
ancient13–20.0429%22 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.0121%22 Mar →
mirage11–130.0321%22 Mar →
overpass14–16-0.0210%21 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.0119%21 Mar →
nuke13–110.0121%21 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0414%20 Mar →
nuke8–130.1025%20 Mar →
dust213–90.0329%20 Mar →
overpass5–130.0417%20 Mar →
anubis13–70.1226%20 Mar →
nuke4–13-0.0817%20 Mar →
anubis11–130.0013%20 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0612%20 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0113%20 Mar →
overpass11–13-0.0515%18 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0223%14 Mar →
nuke13–50.0124%14 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0720%12 Mar →
nuke13–110.0231%11 Mar →
anubis13–60.0027%11 Mar →
dust213–40.049%11 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0615%11 Mar →
ancient11–130.0721%11 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0224%8 Mar →
overpass7–13-0.0420%8 Mar →
nuke12–160.0514%8 Mar →
dust29–130.0235%8 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0213%7 Mar →
anubis13–60.0218%7 Mar →
dust213–90.0316%7 Mar →
inferno7–130.0017%7 Mar →
dust29–130.0627%7 Mar →
nuke13–80.0716%7 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0310%7 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.