Ville-Matti

Ville-Matti — CS2 Stats

FI76561198070316223[U:1:110050495]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

991Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,458Purple band · top ~26.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,442 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,458 +99 13 Mar – 29 Oct · 21 days played
13,21916,853peak 16,85313 Mar29 Oct
16,853Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,442Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-03-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,442
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 89 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,395 below peak (16,853)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,542 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVille-MattiFACEITLevel 6 · 1,442 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,458 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,442csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning57
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateWLLLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 615ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility6.6
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning5.7
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time594ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–3 · overpass, 28 Apr →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 8–1 · anubis, 29 May →
328msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · nuke, 23 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 29 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 21ancientWeakest map · 30% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2114–767%0.01
ancientD206–1430%-0.00
mirageB157–847%-0.02
dust2C114–736%-0.02
infernoC114–736%-0.01
cacheC104–640%-0.01
anubisC83–538%-0.00
overpass—43–175%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

733Matches
51%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
82.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1547%1.0717.3
Nuke1471%1.3518.1
Mirage1040%0.7813.6
Inferno922%0.8615.7
Dust2850%0.8813.4
Overpass250%1.0816.0
Vertigo1100%0.606.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
598msReaction time
38.8%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
8.67HE damage / grenade
15.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.7823% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–90.0215%29 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0624%29 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0116%29 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0520%29 Oct →
cache13–20.1411%17 Oct →
mirage16–120.0014%17 Oct →
nuke13–10.0111%17 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.040%17 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0131%17 Oct →
inferno13–80.0418%17 Oct →
dust213–80.0532%17 Oct →
cache13–10-0.018%17 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0417%17 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0415%17 Oct →
ancient13–30.0212%17 Oct →
anubis16–140.0221%17 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0117%17 Oct →
cache15–150.0128%17 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0811%4 Sept →
dust20–7-0.1329%24 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0216%24 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.100%23 Aug →
nuke13–80.0614%23 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0012%22 Aug →
ancient13–40.0320%22 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0121%22 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0414%18 Jun →
nuke13–110.0626%18 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0316%18 Jun →
nuke13–50.0626%18 Jun →
dust213–110.0216%18 Jun →
mirage6–0-0.0211%18 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.0117%29 May →
anubis8–10.0733%29 May →
ancient10–13-0.0025%29 May →
mirage13–9-0.0215%16 May →
dust210–13-0.0617%16 May →
inferno11–13-0.0115%16 May →
ancient13–80.0723%6 May →
mirage11–13-0.0410%6 May →
anubis15–15-0.027%29 Apr →
nuke13–60.0814%29 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0024%29 Apr →
cache7–13-0.035%29 Apr →
cache3–13-0.0618%29 Apr →
cache13–00.0417%29 Apr →
cache2–13-0.0824%29 Apr →
cache5–13-0.0523%29 Apr →
cache13–2-0.0328%29 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0211%28 Apr →
overpass13–40.0115%28 Apr →
nuke13–50.007%28 Apr →
overpass13–30.218%28 Apr →
mirage7–130.0113%28 Apr →
mirage13–100.0214%28 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.039%28 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0727%28 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0426%28 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0611%25 Apr →
ancient2–13-0.0221%25 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0520%25 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0417%23 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0312%23 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0515%23 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.068%23 Apr →
overpass6–13-0.0319%23 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.0317%23 Apr →
ancient5–130.0117%22 Apr →
dust25–130.0119%22 Apr →
ancient15–15-0.0515%21 Apr →
nuke13–60.0721%21 Apr →
ancient13–40.0721%21 Apr →
anubis11–130.0123%20 Apr →
inferno13–80.0816%20 Apr →
dust213–90.0422%20 Apr →
ancient9–130.0116%20 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0316%20 Apr →
nuke6–130.0620%20 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0021%18 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0410%14 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0321%14 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.0120%14 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0115%14 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.058%2 Apr →
ancient15–150.0315%2 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0715%31 Mar →
nuke6–130.0121%31 Mar →
ancient11–130.0423%18 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0313%17 Mar →
nuke13–60.039%16 Mar →
inferno7–130.0111%16 Mar →
overpass13–110.0514%16 Mar →
dust213–80.0116%16 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0115%14 Mar →
mirage13–160.0416%14 Mar →
mirage13–4-0.0111%14 Mar →
nuke8–00.058%14 Mar →
inferno13–110.0011%14 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.059%13 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.063%13 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.