cricks — CS2 Stats
US76561198068898005[U:1:108632277]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 2,705
- Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 295 to go
- Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
- 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
- Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
Premier CS Rating
- At peak — 28,981
- Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,019 to go
- Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
- Red band first seen 2026-08-28
- Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 52.3% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 15.9% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.40 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 50.7% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Sharp aimer
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 28 | 16–12 | 57% | 0.00 | |
| A | 28 | 18–10 | 64% | -0.01 | |
| S | 15 | 12–3 | 80% | 0.00 | |
| A | 10 | 6–4 | 60% | -0.00 | |
| S | 9 | 7–2 | 78% | 0.00 | |
| S | 5 | 5–0 | 100% | 0.03 | |
| — | 4 | 4–0 | 100% | 0.02 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.02 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (57% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 159 | 53% | 1.04 | 14.2 |
| Dust2 | 89 | 57% | 1.12 | 14.7 |
| Anubis | 77 | 55% | 1.06 | 13.8 |
| Ancient | 67 | 48% | 0.96 | 14.2 |
| Inferno | 44 | 64% | 1.01 | 13.8 |
| Vertigo | 11 | 55% | 0.86 | 13.8 |
| Nuke | 10 | 70% | 0.98 | 14.6 |
| Train | 6 | 50% | 0.80 | 12.8 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.6826% — below the 40% mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19–17 | 0.06 | 17% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.02 | 8% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 7% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.11 | 10% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 16% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | -0.02 | 32% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 19% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.03 | 21% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 22% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.02 | 14% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.02 | 12% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.00 | 30% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 12% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.05 | 17% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.02 | 16% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 28% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 22% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 11% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 11% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 17% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 20% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.05 | 14% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.06 | 18% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 0–2 | -0.08 | 0% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.08 | 11% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 19–17 | -0.01 | 11% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 17–19 | 0.03 | 13% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.00 | 9% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 10% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 9% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.00 | 12% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 19–15 | 0.02 | 10% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.09 | 9% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 24% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 24% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.05 | 10% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.05 | 17% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.05 | 23% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 27% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 27% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.03 | 9% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 16–12 | -0.01 | 14% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.04 | 20% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 18% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 10% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.02 | 15% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.02 | 19% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.02 | 22% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.03 | 16% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.02 | 14% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 8–7 | -0.05 | 8% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.08 | 27% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.00 | 16% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.11 | 23% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.02 | 20% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 18% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.08 | 20% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 12% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 2–11 | -0.04 | 9% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.01 | 7% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.09 | 19% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.09 | 20% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 7% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.03 | 8% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.03 | 25% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.10 | 22% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 30% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.03 | 13% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.06 | 11% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.10 | 50% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.02 | 17% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.03 | 6% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.00 | 17% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | -0.01 | 46% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 8–0 | -0.01 | 11% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.08 | 17% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 16% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.05 | 11% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.10 | 21% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.02 | 18% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 13% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.01 | 21% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.05 | 16% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.03 | 14% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.01 | 12% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.06 | 11% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 18% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.03 | 21% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.03 | 16% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.02 | 8% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.13 | 40% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.05 | 13% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.08 | 14% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 15% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.07 | 19% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.04 | 25% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.02 | 31% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 19% | 26 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.