✪§𝒶𝓀𝓊 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198067019934[U:1:106754206]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,206Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating23,285Top 25% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#40539 of 259896 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,285 +1,889 10 Oct – 29 Oct · 17 days played

26,199Peak Premier in tracked matches

18Days played since 2026-10-09

Premier CS Rating

2,564 below peak (25,849)
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,715 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning52

Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateLWWLWWLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 477ms

Last 10

4–5–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 508ms

Last 20

10–9–1 · 50% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.5

Utility6.5

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels1.7

Clutch6.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 49% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning5.2

Utility6.5

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time529ms−41ms

first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms

Headshot accuracy18.1%+0.7%

first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 27 Oct →

46%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · nuke, 23 Oct →

344msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 14 Oct →

13–1Biggest win · nuke, 14 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 36% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	24	15–9	63%	-0.02
cache	A	19	11–8	58%	-0.02
inferno	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.02
mirage	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.03
anubis	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.02
dust2	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.04
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	0.00
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

888Matches

51%Win rate

0.84Avg K/D

75.8ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win

32%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	26	69%	1.05	14.6
Mirage	23	35%	0.90	12.7
Inferno	18	39%	0.78	11.9
Ancient	17	47%	0.93	14.3
Dust2	12	50%	0.80	11.6
Vertigo	9	44%	0.81	14.4
Anubis	4	25%	0.80	14.3
Train	2	50%	0.96	15.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy

36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.6%Spray accuracy

86.5%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

519msReaction time

49.3%T opening success

33.4%CT opening success

0.70Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

10.09HE damage / grenade

9.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 33.4448% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	7–13	-0.01	28%	29 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.03	19%	28 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.00	24%	28 Oct →
dust2	3–13	-0.11	11%	28 Oct →
inferno	16–14	-0.06	9%	28 Oct →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	7%	28 Oct →
anubis	2–13	-0.08	19%	28 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.12	30%	27 Oct →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	15%	27 Oct →
dust2	15–15	0.04	16%	27 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	26%	27 Oct →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	6%	27 Oct →
vertigo	9–13	-0.09	0%	27 Oct →
nuke	13–5	-0.08	19%	27 Oct →
cache	13–8	0.02	11%	27 Oct →
vertigo	13–6	-0.02	23%	27 Oct →
nuke	13–7	0.14	16%	27 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	17%	26 Oct →
anubis	13–3	0.05	18%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	15%	26 Oct →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	25%	26 Oct →
cache	13–7	0.03	25%	26 Oct →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	14%	25 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.04	18%	25 Oct →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	17%	25 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	20%	25 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	21%	25 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.03	20%	25 Oct →
nuke	10–13	-0.08	46%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	21%	23 Oct →
mirage	16–14	-0.07	13%	22 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.07	14%	22 Oct →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	14%	22 Oct →
cache	2–13	-0.07	29%	22 Oct →
nuke	16–13	-0.01	13%	21 Oct →
dust2	13–9	-0.07	35%	21 Oct →
anubis	14–16	-0.03	9%	21 Oct →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	13%	21 Oct →
ancient	8–13	0.02	15%	21 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	8%	21 Oct →
nuke	13–8	0.04	29%	21 Oct →
cache	12–12	-0.03	17%	21 Oct →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	17%	20 Oct →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	28%	20 Oct →
nuke	6–13	-0.07	33%	20 Oct →
anubis	8–13	0.00	11%	20 Oct →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	32%	20 Oct →
mirage	13–9	0.00	16%	19 Oct →
ancient	13–4	0.08	21%	19 Oct →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	14%	18 Oct →
anubis	13–8	0.02	26%	18 Oct →
dust2	1–13	-0.06	17%	18 Oct →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	17%	18 Oct →
nuke	13–2	0.01	27%	18 Oct →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	24%	18 Oct →
cache	5–13	-0.05	16%	18 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.02	15%	18 Oct →
nuke	13–8	0.03	19%	18 Oct →
cache	13–7	-0.07	23%	15 Oct →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	23%	15 Oct →
inferno	16–12	0.07	20%	15 Oct →
ancient	13–11	-0.07	19%	15 Oct →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	17%	15 Oct →
nuke	13–7	-0.06	19%	15 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.14	12%	15 Oct →
nuke	12–12	0.06	26%	15 Oct →
cache	13–7	0.06	22%	15 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	13%	14 Oct →
cache	13–4	-0.01	15%	14 Oct →
nuke	13–9	-0.06	16%	14 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	17%	14 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	31%	14 Oct →
nuke	13–1	0.07	6%	14 Oct →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	23%	14 Oct →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	21%	13 Oct →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	31%	13 Oct →
inferno	2–13	-0.02	9%	13 Oct →
cache	9–13	-0.06	21%	13 Oct →
nuke	13–9	-0.05	18%	13 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.05	12%	13 Oct →
cache	13–10	0.01	13%	13 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	15%	12 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.02	13%	12 Oct →
inferno	13–1	0.08	13%	11 Oct →
nuke	8–13	-0.07	13%	11 Oct →
dust2	13–7	-0.08	17%	11 Oct →
cache	5–13	0.01	14%	11 Oct →
cache	7–13	0.01	23%	11 Oct →
cache	5–13	-0.12	6%	11 Oct →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	38%	11 Oct →
anubis	16–13	0.00	12%	11 Oct →
dust2	13–6	0.02	30%	11 Oct →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	22%	11 Oct →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	20%	10 Oct →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	11%	10 Oct →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	17%	10 Oct →
nuke	13–2	-0.04	13%	10 Oct →
cache	13–7	0.00	24%	9 Oct →
cache	13–6	-0.07	14%	9 Oct →
anubis	13–8	-0.07	14%	9 Oct →