Insomnia — CS2 Stats

76561198066843506[U:1:106577778]

6,954Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.1 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating21,638Pink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6300 of 18401 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,993 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,638Peak Premier on CSDB

1,993Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,993
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 8 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 21,638
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,362 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84

Positioning63

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateWLLWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.4

Aggression10.0

Utility4.3

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels6.3

Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4

Positioning6.3

Utility4.3

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels6.3

Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time541ms−18ms

first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms

Headshot accuracy18.9%−0.7%

first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — anubis 13–7

13–0Biggest win — inferno

6Longest win streak

12–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 36cacheWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
anubis	A	36	23–13	64%	0.01
dust2	C	21	9–12	43%	-0.00
mirage	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.01
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	0.00
ancient	C	7	3–4	43%	0.02
cache	D	6	2–4	33%	0.01
nuke	D	6	2–4	33%	0.01
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,536Matches

49%Win rate

1.16Avg K/D

77.7ADR

33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	720	53%	1.21	17.2
Ancient	564	45%	1.15	16.7
Mirage	561	47%	1.09	15.5
Dust2	549	49%	1.13	16.4
Inferno	458	51%	1.18	17.4
Nuke	303	51%	1.20	17.0
Vertigo	132	51%	1.15	16.9
Overpass	39	51%	1.02	16.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy

40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.3%Spray accuracy

82.2%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

531msReaction time

55.4%T opening success

55.1%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

5.8%Flash assists

18.65HE damage / grenade

3.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4649 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–6	-0.00	16%	28 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	10%	28 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	33%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	12%	26 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.00	27%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	7%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	33%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	16%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	23%	23 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.04	42%	23 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.01	23%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	31%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.06	17%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	17%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.03	10%	21 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.04	25%	21 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	9%	21 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	13%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	28%	19 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.00	15%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.04	19%	19 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.07	12%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.01	5%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.03	18%	19 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.08	22%	19 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	20%	18 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.01	23%	18 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.05	17%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	25%	18 Aug →
ancient	5–10	-0.05	10%	18 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	15%	18 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	14%	17 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.00	10%	17 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	0.08	16%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.02	21%	17 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	6%	16 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	11%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	33%	16 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	10%	15 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.00	36%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.12	11%	15 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.07	22%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	12%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	9%	14 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.03	19%	14 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.05	17%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.00	17%	12 Aug →
dust2	2–7	0.00	0%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.04	32%	11 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.01	9%	11 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.08	23%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.05	27%	10 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	-0.03	14%	10 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.00	26%	10 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.00	30%	10 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.07	21%	10 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.01	16%	10 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.05	22%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.03	9%	9 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	18%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.11	21%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.05	21%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.02	15%	8 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	20%	8 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.02	26%	8 Aug →
ancient	2–13	0.05	26%	7 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	19%	7 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	-0.07	15%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.07	11%	5 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	11%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.08	28%	3 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.02	11%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.10	21%	2 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.10	23%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.07	26%	1 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	21%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	6%	31 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	26%	31 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.02	20%	31 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	14%	30 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.10	0%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	16%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.02	28%	30 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	17%	30 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	10%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.03	20%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	8%	27 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	21%	27 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.01	15%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.02	13%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.01	22%	27 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	45%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	39%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.02	17%	26 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	23%	26 Jul →
anubis	4–13	0.01	38%	25 Jul →
anubis	22–20	0.00	25%	24 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.01	20%	24 Jul →