sakke

sakke — CS2 Stats

76561198065665942[U:1:105400214]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

720Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,502Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,104 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 720 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 28 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,555 -4,496 28 Dec7 Apr · 22 days played
13,28019,446peak 19,44628 Dec7 Apr
19,446Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,104Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2025-12-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,104
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 97 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 13 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 13 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 13 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,302), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate42.0%45.7%46.8%4.8% short
Shot accuracy17.0%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.841.051.060.23 short
Match win rate43.8%45.7%46.3%2.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsakkeFACEITLevel 7 · 1,104 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,104csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning55
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42544Last 10042%Win rateWLWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · −100ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.0
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time644ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 722ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 10 Aug
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · nuke, 1 Feb
445msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 10 Aug
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 23 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 11dust2Weakest map · 29% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB34161847%0.00
dust2D2161529%-0.03
ancientC2081240%-0.00
nukeA116555%-0.00
infernoC83538%-0.00
overpass31233%-0.05
cache110100%0.02
anubis110100%0.01
train1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

55,600Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
3,002Matches
43.8%Match win rate
42.0%Headshot %
17.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
6,450MVPs
1,444Hours (in match)
3,254Bombs planted
719Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,927
AWP3,778
P903,148
Tec-91,065
FAMAS1,008
Knife944

Lifetime map wins

8,848dust2
2,406inferno
1,794nuke
1,791train
489cbble
411vertigo
92office
41aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

739Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
74.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9156%1.0715.7
Dust23441%0.8513.7
Ancient3047%0.8212.5
Anubis2962%1.0916.0
Nuke2339%0.9014.8
Inferno1631%1.0015.6
Overpass1242%0.7811.8
Cache1070%1.0613.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
644msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
9.00HE damage / grenade
6.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.8157% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–120.0222%9 Sept
nuke16–19-0.0014%10 Aug
inferno13–50.1119%10 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0818%10 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0412%9 Aug
mirage13–80.0216%9 Aug
cache13–80.0212%8 Aug
nuke13–80.0221%3 Aug
inferno10–130.0222%27 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0627%27 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0522%22 Jul
ancient13–70.0321%22 Jul
mirage16–13-0.039%22 Jul
dust213–7-0.0132%21 Jul
mirage13–40.1019%16 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0621%16 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0416%15 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0223%29 Jun
mirage19–160.0428%29 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0117%14 May
ancient5–13-0.0611%7 Apr
dust26–13-0.0314%30 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0118%19 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0322%18 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0213%18 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0514%24 Feb
dust210–13-0.048%22 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0415%19 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0121%18 Feb
dust26–130.0019%18 Feb
dust213–100.0312%16 Feb
dust214–16-0.0624%16 Feb
mirage13–50.0113%16 Feb
nuke8–130.0017%15 Feb
mirage13–110.0122%15 Feb
inferno13–100.0418%15 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0623%13 Feb
dust215–150.0824%10 Feb
nuke16–130.0316%8 Feb
dust213–50.0523%8 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0311%8 Feb
mirage8–130.0721%8 Feb
mirage6–130.0321%8 Feb
dust210–13-0.0511%8 Feb
ancient13–100.0716%8 Feb
mirage9–130.0729%8 Feb
mirage6–13-0.068%7 Feb
ancient14–16-0.0117%7 Feb
nuke16–140.0316%7 Feb
mirage2–13-0.1117%7 Feb
mirage15–150.0023%7 Feb
ancient13–100.0320%7 Feb
ancient13–70.0217%7 Feb
dust28–13-0.0518%6 Feb
mirage13–80.0425%6 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0128%6 Feb
dust26–13-0.0924%4 Feb
ancient6–130.0117%3 Feb
nuke13–40.0221%3 Feb
anubis13–60.0121%3 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0310%3 Feb
mirage6–130.0113%3 Feb
dust210–13-0.0519%2 Feb
mirage13–60.0418%2 Feb
nuke13–30.0215%2 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0513%2 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0227%1 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0511%1 Feb
dust213–10-0.0228%1 Feb
nuke13–100.0233%1 Feb
dust25–13-0.1019%1 Feb
ancient14–160.0113%31 Jan
dust211–13-0.0027%30 Jan
mirage13–160.0322%30 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0632%30 Jan
dust213–11-0.0620%30 Jan
mirage13–110.0217%28 Jan
mirage10–130.0031%28 Jan
train11–13-0.0613%27 Jan
dust21–13-0.0218%26 Jan
mirage10–130.0420%26 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0613%24 Jan
mirage13–40.0121%24 Jan
ancient3–130.0427%23 Jan
mirage13–30.037%23 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0817%23 Jan
dust28–13-0.0515%23 Jan
ancient13–20.0015%23 Jan
dust22–13-0.0916%22 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0224%22 Jan
ancient6–130.0128%19 Jan
dust216–13-0.0224%14 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0118%13 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0220%6 Jan
overpass15–15-0.0617%28 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0214%28 Dec
overpass13–5-0.0317%28 Dec
dust23–13-0.0619%28 Dec
mirage13–60.0024%28 Dec
mirage13–80.0215%28 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →