Wangaroo

Wangaroo — CS2 Stats

CA76561198065418645[U:1:105152917]Steam profile ↗

1,304Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning48
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY71254Last 10071%Win rateLWWWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression5.6
Utility7.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.8
Utility7.5
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time556ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 9–2
130Biggest win — mirage
14Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 88% over 17dust2Weakest map · 62% over 34
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A34211362%0.02
mirageS2318578%0.01
infernoS1715288%0.02
cacheS1611569%0.02
ancientS64267%0.01
nuke31233%-0.05
overpass110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (62% over 34). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

332Matches
57%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
78.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9456%1.0715.5
Dust26558%1.0214.3
Inferno3658%0.9413.6
Ancient3142%1.0114.4
Anubis1464%1.2916.6
Nuke1145%0.9313.8
Train978%1.0419.3
Overpass450%0.7914.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
568msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
10.5%Flash assists
9.98HE damage / grenade
14.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.6575% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache6–13-0.0014%28 Aug
inferno9–30.1223%28 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0419%28 Aug
inferno13–90.0319%26 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0512%21 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0219%19 Aug
dust211–13-0.0425%19 Aug
dust213–50.0921%18 Aug
ancient10–130.0421%15 Aug
nuke9–13-0.1122%15 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0410%14 Aug
dust210–13-0.0624%14 Aug
dust213–30.0917%12 Aug
inferno13–100.0511%7 Aug
dust212–120.0619%7 Aug
dust23–13-0.0119%5 Aug
mirage13–10.1111%5 Aug
dust24–130.0218%31 Jul
dust213–4-0.0030%31 Jul
dust213–60.0319%29 Jul
cache13–60.0022%29 Jul
inferno13–1-0.0032%29 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0221%24 Jul
cache13–9-0.0231%22 Jul
cache13–40.0120%22 Jul
dust213–70.0119%21 Jul
dust27–130.0820%21 Jul
cache10–130.1317%21 Jul
ancient13–70.0217%21 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0030%21 Jul
dust213–10-0.009%17 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0613%15 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0034%15 Jul
mirage13–00.0815%14 Jul
cache13–90.0221%14 Jul
mirage13–70.0621%10 Jul
dust213–60.0219%10 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0118%9 Jul
cache13–20.1022%9 Jul
dust213–30.0628%9 Jul
dust213–5-0.0319%9 Jul
mirage13–20.0122%7 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0313%7 Jul
dust213–30.0322%7 Jul
mirage13–40.0119%30 Jun
inferno13–30.058%30 Jun
cache13–110.0121%29 Jun
dust28–130.0215%29 Jun
dust23–130.0018%29 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0029%29 Jun
dust213–50.0217%7 Jun
mirage13–40.0418%6 Jun
mirage22–200.0420%5 Jun
dust213–7-0.0210%4 Jun
inferno13–50.0520%2 Jun
dust211–130.0230%2 Jun
dust211–13-0.0020%29 May
inferno9–20.1824%29 May
inferno13–00.0229%28 May
cache6–130.0117%28 May
inferno13–50.0224%28 May
overpass13–20.0325%28 May
mirage9–3-0.0811%26 May
ancient13–80.0218%26 May
dust21–13-0.0116%26 May
cache13–40.0113%26 May
mirage3–13-0.0623%26 May
mirage12–120.0213%26 May
cache13–5-0.0327%25 May
mirage13–80.0517%25 May
dust213–20.0432%25 May
mirage13–110.0114%25 May
inferno13–0-0.0222%23 May
mirage13–10-0.0214%22 May
cache11–13-0.0222%22 May
mirage11–130.0313%22 May
mirage13–40.0133%22 May
dust23–13-0.1026%22 May
ancient13–50.0523%22 May
inferno13–10.0944%22 May
cache13–30.1250%22 May
dust213–70.1135%22 May
dust213–20.0320%22 May
inferno13–5-0.0311%21 May
dust213–20.0013%21 May
dust213–70.0454%20 May
cache13–3-0.0350%20 May
cache13–11-0.0117%20 May
dust213–40.0624%20 May
dust213–30.0320%20 May
dust213–50.0322%19 May
cache3–130.039%19 May
nuke6–13-0.0312%19 May
ancient3–13-0.0614%19 May
dust29–13-0.0115%19 May
mirage12–120.0421%19 May
dust213–3-0.0217%19 May
mirage13–11-0.0022%19 May
mirage13–70.0216%15 May
mirage13–60.0216%15 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches14-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →