KarK

KarK — CS2 Stats

FI76561198065268650[U:1:105002922]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,448Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,763 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (62 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,763 → 1,763
+162Tracked matches · now 2,448
−8.7ppWin rate · 62.1% → 53.3%

Rating over time

1,763Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-07-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,763
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 238 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKarKFACEITLevel 9 · 1,763 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,763csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning64
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateLLWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.5pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time549ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 13 Aug →
28%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 26 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 16–12 · nuke, 10 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 23nukeWeakest map · 45% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3418–1653%-0.00
ancientS2316–770%-0.00
nukeB209–1145%-0.00
anubisA116–555%-0.01
cacheS64–267%0.04
dust2—31–233%0.01
inferno—20–20%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,974Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
75.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage63148%0.9814.5
Ancient43153%0.9915.4
Nuke25346%0.9715.3
Anubis22053%0.9915.3
Dust211453%1.0014.8
Inferno9145%0.9915.1
Overpass5250%0.9915.8
Cache4452%0.9314.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
72.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
552msReaction time
65.7%T opening success
37.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
9.48HE damage / grenade
7.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.1097% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.049%20 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0026%9 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0421%9 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0116%8 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0018%5 Oct →
mirage13–90.1020%5 Oct →
nuke9–130.0118%2 Oct →
ancient16–140.0216%30 Sept →
nuke13–80.0519%29 Sept →
ancient13–70.0012%28 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0213%28 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0111%27 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0220%27 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0116%27 Sept →
cache13–110.0920%22 Sept →
anubis9–130.004%22 Sept →
cache13–100.0717%22 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.039%19 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0310%18 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0311%17 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0620%17 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.094%17 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0423%17 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0417%17 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0511%17 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0314%17 Sept →
mirage14–160.0122%16 Sept →
ancient13–100.0412%16 Sept →
mirage13–80.057%15 Sept →
ancient13–50.0912%15 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0924%15 Sept →
nuke13–80.0418%15 Sept →
ancient13–30.0217%15 Sept →
mirage13–70.0620%15 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0015%14 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0515%13 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0811%13 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0316%13 Sept →
mirage13–160.0017%13 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0022%13 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0215%11 Sept →
nuke16–120.0317%10 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0126%10 Sept →
dust213–70.0427%10 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0811%10 Sept →
ancient13–50.0727%10 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0210%10 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0015%9 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0119%9 Sept →
mirage16–130.0022%9 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0223%7 Sept →
mirage13–80.0118%7 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0220%7 Sept →
nuke7–130.0122%7 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0212%7 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.079%7 Sept →
anubis10–130.039%6 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0215%2 Sept →
mirage13–80.0520%2 Sept →
cache15–150.0714%2 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0314%1 Sept →
mirage16–140.0415%31 Aug →
mirage13–40.058%30 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0822%30 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0118%20 Aug →
mirage13–40.0623%20 Aug →
ancient9–130.0414%20 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0222%20 Aug →
anubis10–130.0012%16 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0012%14 Aug →
ancient2–130.004%14 Aug →
vertigo13–40.0214%14 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0127%14 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0115%14 Aug →
mirage13–80.0617%13 Aug →
ancient13–100.019%13 Aug →
nuke13–40.1524%13 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0119%9 Aug →
cache13–160.0314%9 Aug →
mirage13–40.0416%9 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0315%7 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0214%5 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0314%5 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.043%5 Aug →
dust28–130.0216%4 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0819%3 Aug →
mirage13–60.0528%26 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0119%26 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0122%26 Jul →
mirage13–80.0312%22 Jul →
ancient13–80.0323%22 Jul →
nuke13–30.0310%22 Jul →
nuke5–130.0212%19 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.069%16 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0010%16 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.0323%12 Jul →
anubis13–5-0.0511%11 Jul →
anubis13–70.0113%11 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0113%9 Jul →
ancient19–16-0.029%8 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.