OlsenTF — CS2 Stats

76561198065131753[U:1:104866025]

2,900Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,538 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOlsenTFFACEITLevel 10 · 2,538 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning52
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52471Last 10052%Win rateWWLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression6.4
Utility5.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time489ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 489ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — overpass 13–0
130Biggest win — overpass
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
35In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2291341%0.01
ancientA2012860%0.02
nukeA2012860%0.01
mirageS118373%0.04
anubisD51420%0.04
trainD51420%0.02
overpassA53260%0.05
dust243175%0.00
cache4040%0.01
vertigo43175%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,086Matches
51%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
79.6ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient45951%1.1016.2
Inferno41850%1.1716.4
Nuke38259%1.2716.9
Train14053%1.2915.8
Anubis12137%1.0715.6
Overpass11649%1.1516.3
Vertigo8749%1.1115.9
Mirage5227%1.0114.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.7%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
489msReaction time
34.0%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
11.2%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
6.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4794 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.9822% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0018%28 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0221%22 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0416%21 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0116%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.0924%20 Aug
ancient13–50.0211%20 Aug
ancient13–100.0012%20 Aug
dust219–150.0223%17 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0227%17 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0316%16 Aug
inferno6–130.0523%14 Aug
train8–13-0.0217%14 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0610%13 Aug
cache9–13-0.0325%13 Aug
mirage13–80.067%12 Aug
inferno13–60.0428%12 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0420%12 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0810%11 Aug
vertigo13–100.0635%4 Aug
cache10–130.0018%4 Aug
inferno13–90.0522%4 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0540%30 Jul
inferno13–80.026%30 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0135%30 Jul
ancient13–90.0223%30 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0125%28 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0627%28 Jul
ancient13–60.0024%23 Jul
nuke13–40.0837%17 Jul
ancient8–130.0216%16 Jul
nuke13–50.0615%14 Jul
anubis15–19-0.0317%14 Jul
ancient13–90.0315%14 Jul
vertigo2–9-0.2431%14 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0323%11 Jul
ancient13–70.0815%7 Jul
overpass9–130.0826%5 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0229%5 Jul
mirage13–60.1018%2 Jul
overpass13–00.1518%2 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0115%2 Jul
inferno12–160.0114%2 Jul
mirage13–60.1422%30 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0129%30 Jun
inferno12–160.0117%30 Jun
nuke13–70.0115%26 Jun
mirage13–80.0615%26 Jun
nuke10–130.0022%26 Jun
ancient13–100.025%26 Jun
mirage5–130.0316%25 Jun
overpass13–60.1035%25 Jun
nuke13–60.0223%25 Jun
ancient16–120.0423%25 Jun
dust213–20.0630%24 Jun
mirage13–10.0228%24 Jun
mirage3–130.0131%23 Jun
nuke13–30.0222%23 Jun
ancient11–130.0121%23 Jun
train4–10.0136%23 Jun
inferno13–160.0021%23 Jun
train4–130.0228%23 Jun
train12–120.1013%23 Jun
cache5–130.0227%21 Jun
nuke13–40.1020%18 Jun
ancient11–130.0524%18 Jun
nuke13–90.0732%18 Jun
nuke13–110.0320%18 Jun
anubis12–160.1321%12 Jun
inferno10–130.0417%12 Jun
ancient13–40.1023%12 Jun
mirage13–90.0023%11 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0324%11 Jun
nuke13–30.0513%11 Jun
inferno12–160.0114%11 Jun
nuke16–13-0.017%11 Jun
vertigo13–80.1025%9 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0320%9 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0416%4 Jun
vertigo13–6-0.0327%4 Jun
inferno13–70.0218%4 Jun
inferno19–160.0625%3 Jun
anubis13–40.0920%2 Jun
cache9–130.0616%2 Jun
nuke8–13-0.039%2 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0311%1 Jun
inferno13–50.0425%28 May
ancient3–11-0.0122%21 May
dust210–130.0118%21 May
train1–13-0.0316%21 May
nuke13–2-0.12100%21 May
inferno1–13-0.0630%21 May
nuke14–160.0416%15 May
nuke13–9-0.0013%15 May
nuke9–13-0.0120%5 May
ancient13–30.0732%6 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0316%6 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0516%2 Apr
anubis6–130.0323%2 Apr
inferno13–70.0813%2 Apr
mirage13–30.1113%2 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →