green tea seaweed sea

green tea seaweed sea — CS2 Stats

AM76561198064570641[U:1:104304913]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,124Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,452Top 10% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10660 of 261562 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,452 +1,931 16 Apr – 13 Nov · 24 days played
23,60926,956peak 26,95616 Apr13 Nov
Faceit ELO: 939 +0 11 Sept – 22 Sept · 3 observations
939939peak 93911 Sept22 Sept
27,252Peak Premier in tracked matches
939Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-04-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 504 below peak (26,956)
  • +1,769 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,548 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgreen tea seaweed seaPREMIER26,452 · Red bandPEAK ELO939csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning48
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLLLLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −7.0pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time586ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 9 May →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · ancient, 4 Nov →
336msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 17 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · italy, 12 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2711–1641%-0.04
mirageB137–654%-0.03
dust2B126–650%-0.01
infernoD103–730%-0.03
nukeS96–367%-0.01
ancientA95–456%-0.02
anubisD72–529%-0.03
overpassS64–267%-0.03
train—21–150%-0.04
italy—11–0100%-0.03
shelter—11–0100%0.02
office—11–0100%-0.08
warden—10–10%-0.13
vertigo—10–10%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,008Matches
54%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
61.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18149%0.8311.6
Nuke8855%0.8612.4
Anubis7447%0.9511.9
Ancient7159%0.7911.7
Dust26764%0.9211.7
Inferno5157%0.7411.2
Vertigo4151%0.7511.3
Overpass2167%0.8310.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
74.2%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
588msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
43.1%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
9.47HE damage / grenade
6.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5952% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–16-0.0720%13 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0850%4 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.047%1 Nov →
dust22–13-0.0412%1 Nov →
cache13–70.0428%1 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0225%1 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.0410%1 Nov →
train13–6-0.0432%1 Nov →
cache16–12-0.0511%31 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0219%31 Oct →
train8–13-0.0416%30 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0445%30 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0622%29 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0340%28 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0242%26 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0637%26 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0429%25 Oct →
inferno10–130.0517%25 Oct →
anubis16–120.0116%25 Oct →
overpass8–13-0.0423%25 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0217%22 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0113%22 Oct →
mirage13–60.0219%20 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0311%20 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0817%20 Oct →
nuke16–120.0514%19 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0628%19 Oct →
dust213–40.0638%19 Oct →
mirage13–110.0438%18 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0224%18 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.028%18 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0317%17 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0712%17 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0330%17 Oct →
dust213–100.0126%17 Oct →
inferno13–160.0112%17 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0013%16 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.078%16 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.069%16 Oct →
cache13–5-0.067%15 Oct →
nuke13–70.0224%15 Oct →
ancient9–130.0016%15 Oct →
dust213–40.0313%15 Oct →
dust25–13-0.086%14 Oct →
ancient13–100.0622%14 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0114%13 Oct →
italy13–1-0.0310%12 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0511%12 Oct →
nuke16–140.0720%12 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.039%12 Oct →
cache3–10-0.0614%9 Jul →
shelter13–60.0218%9 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0532%26 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0226%26 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0126%25 Jun →
overpass16–14-0.0526%22 Jun →
dust211–13-0.028%12 Jun →
ancient13–6-0.0728%12 Jun →
anubis12–16-0.0128%12 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.0333%12 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0122%12 Jun →
overpass9–13-0.0427%6 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0615%5 Jun →
dust213–110.0121%5 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0723%4 Jun →
mirage13–2-0.0636%4 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.0421%29 May →
cache13–8-0.0124%29 May →
cache14–16-0.0217%26 May →
inferno8–13-0.1317%26 May →
inferno13–6-0.0222%22 May →
anubis12–16-0.0714%22 May →
nuke13–7-0.0122%22 May →
mirage5–13-0.0733%22 May →
dust27–10.0446%21 May →
office6–2-0.0820%21 May →
cache4–13-0.0514%21 May →
cache13–11-0.0343%21 May →
overpass13–9-0.0719%15 May →
warden2–13-0.130%15 May →
anubis13–10.0323%15 May →
cache10–13-0.0322%12 May →
cache3–13-0.0719%12 May →
nuke7–13-0.0521%10 May →
cache8–13-0.0339%10 May →
ancient13–40.0715%9 May →
cache13–7-0.0127%9 May →
cache13–10-0.0621%9 May →
cache10–13-0.0018%8 May →
cache9–13-0.0817%8 May →
cache9–13-0.0933%8 May →
cache12–12-0.0914%5 May →
cache11–13-0.0324%1 May →
cache11–130.0338%1 May →
cache2–10-0.0840%1 May →
cache13–9-0.0328%30 Apr →
cache13–9-0.0636%29 Apr →
vertigo6–13-0.0919%23 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0911%23 Apr →
overpass13–70.0312%16 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.