FatherSnus

FatherSnus — CS2 Stats

VA76561198063431294[U:1:103165566]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,750Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,967Top 25% of 203,074 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41966 of 250021 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,816 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,967 +4,197 19 Aug – 5 Oct · 23 days played
18,77024,034peak 24,03419 Aug5 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,816 +0 13 Sept – 17 Sept · 2 observations
1,8161,816peak 1,81613 Sept17 Sept
24,034Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,816Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,816
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 185 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,067 below peak (24,034)
  • +777 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,033 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFatherSnusFACEITLevel 7 · 1,816 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,967 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,816csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning66
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateWLWLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −9.1pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.7
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 69% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.6
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time558ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 17 Sept →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 22 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 9 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3419–1556%-0.00
infernoB2713–1448%0.00
ancientS128–467%0.04
anubisA106–460%0.03
mirageD81–713%0.01
cacheC52–340%-0.02
nuke—21–150%-0.01
shelter—10–10%0.02
poseidon—10–10%-0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

220Matches
55%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
87.6ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22868%1.5218.6
Ancient2536%1.1216.8
Mirage1947%1.0814.3
Inferno1872%1.2420.9
Anubis1443%1.0314.2
Vertigo1436%0.6811.9
Nuke580%1.1718.0
Cache333%0.8213.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
550msReaction time
68.7%T opening success
40.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
9.07HE damage / grenade
5.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–50.049%5 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0421%5 Oct →
inferno13–60.0321%5 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0711%5 Oct →
mirage5–130.0622%5 Oct →
dust210–130.0011%4 Oct →
anubis13–110.0416%4 Oct →
ancient13–50.1115%3 Oct →
mirage5–130.0519%2 Oct →
inferno13–110.0211%2 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0722%1 Oct →
dust214–160.0217%28 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0811%28 Sept →
ancient13–90.0123%28 Sept →
cache2–130.0229%28 Sept →
dust213–70.1047%22 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0421%21 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0633%21 Sept →
dust26–130.0623%20 Sept →
mirage8–130.0123%20 Sept →
anubis4–00.1129%20 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0018%20 Sept →
inferno13–80.0720%20 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0510%19 Sept →
ancient13–40.1523%17 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0111%17 Sept →
dust214–160.0118%16 Sept →
ancient13–90.0414%16 Sept →
dust213–30.0315%16 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0214%16 Sept →
inferno7–130.0415%15 Sept →
ancient13–30.0828%15 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0511%15 Sept →
anubis13–80.0613%14 Sept →
anubis11–130.0115%14 Sept →
nuke13–110.0615%14 Sept →
dust213–100.0219%13 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0110%13 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0519%13 Sept →
ancient8–130.0414%13 Sept →
mirage9–130.0311%13 Sept →
inferno13–90.0314%10 Sept →
inferno10–130.0116%10 Sept →
dust20–13-0.079%10 Sept →
shelter7–130.0218%10 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0326%9 Sept →
inferno3–60.0336%9 Sept →
ancient10–130.0218%9 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0330%9 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0327%9 Sept →
inferno13–80.0630%9 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0016%7 Sept →
inferno13–160.0116%7 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0219%7 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0516%7 Sept →
ancient9–130.045%6 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0417%6 Sept →
dust22–130.0523%6 Sept →
dust213–20.0321%6 Sept →
inferno13–00.0216%6 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0327%6 Sept →
dust26–13-0.039%6 Sept →
ancient13–100.0214%6 Sept →
dust213–40.0124%6 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0015%4 Sept →
anubis7–130.0225%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0117%4 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0224%4 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0427%3 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0019%3 Sept →
dust216–140.0232%3 Sept →
dust213–100.0715%31 Aug →
anubis11–130.0116%30 Aug →
dust213–50.0219%30 Aug →
nuke3–9-0.0821%30 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0432%30 Aug →
anubis13–60.0317%30 Aug →
inferno13–10.0614%30 Aug →
inferno13–50.0723%30 Aug →
ancient13–90.0121%30 Aug →
mirage8–130.029%28 Aug →
anubis13–20.0124%28 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0510%27 Aug →
inferno9–4-0.0133%27 Aug →
poseidon2–9-0.1733%27 Aug →
anubis13–90.0721%27 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0623%27 Aug →
dust213–70.0223%26 Aug →
ancient13–60.0321%26 Aug →
inferno6–130.0415%26 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0516%26 Aug →
mirage13–1-0.0015%26 Aug →
dust213–110.0415%26 Aug →
dust213–100.0321%24 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0318%19 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0325%19 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0116%19 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0325%12 Aug →
inferno0–13-0.030%12 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0416%12 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.