Willie Junior Maxwell II

Willie Junior Maxwell II — CS2 Stats

NL76561198062421241[U:1:102155513]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,487Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,373Top 25% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#49047 of 247844 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,983 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,373 -3,132 25 Apr – 28 Sept · 17 days played
22,37325,505peak 25,50525 Apr28 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,983 +0 30 Aug – 23 Sept · 7 observations
1,9831,983peak 1,98330 Aug23 Sept
25,862Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,983Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-04-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,983
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 18 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,132 below peak (25,505)
  • -1,278 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,627 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWillie Junior Maxwell IIFACEITLevel 9 · 1,983 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,373 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,983csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning52
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–42–5Last 10053%Win rateLWWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility3.4
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.2
Utility3.4
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time556ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 2 May →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · overpass, 2 May →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 28 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 11 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
3–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 87% over 15infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C177–1041%-0.00
anubisC177–1041%-0.00
cacheS1513–287%0.02
ancientB147–750%0.01
mirageA127–558%-0.01
infernoD113–827%0.00
overpassB84–450%-0.01
nukeS54–180%0.01
train—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,069Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
77.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10548%0.9314.5
Inferno6456%1.0315.2
Anubis6245%0.9415.2
Mirage6162%0.9816.1
Nuke3858%0.8914.1
Overpass3664%1.0216.1
Dust23241%0.7913.8
Cache1164%1.1816.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
564msReaction time
46.8%T opening success
46.7%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.73HE damage / grenade
6.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3922 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0429%28 Sept →
ancient13–60.0220%24 Sept →
dust213–60.0426%24 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.047%24 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0326%24 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0121%24 Sept →
dust213–80.0213%23 Sept →
dust216–130.0112%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0116%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0313%23 Sept →
nuke13–30.0212%23 Sept →
cache13–90.0514%23 Sept →
cache13–100.0028%13 Sept →
dust213–20.1222%13 Sept →
cache13–1-0.0119%11 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0322%11 Sept →
cache13–50.0720%11 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0514%11 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.025%11 Sept →
anubis9–130.0624%11 Sept →
mirage13–80.0123%11 Sept →
mirage13–10.0124%11 Sept →
dust213–30.0820%11 Sept →
ancient0–13-0.0612%11 Sept →
cache13–80.0513%11 Sept →
anubis13–100.0525%11 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0213%7 Sept →
cache19–220.0221%6 Sept →
dust213–80.0821%6 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0215%6 Sept →
inferno9–130.0119%6 Sept →
inferno13–30.0024%6 Sept →
nuke13–110.0018%6 Sept →
ancient12–160.0122%6 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0821%6 Sept →
cache13–30.0412%6 Sept →
anubis9–130.0116%6 Sept →
nuke13–50.0116%6 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0416%5 Sept →
mirage13–80.1035%5 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0812%5 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0614%20 Aug →
dust25–13-0.1016%12 Jul →
ancient13–10.0116%12 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0315%12 Jul →
cache13–90.0221%12 Jul →
dust27–13-0.130%28 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0511%28 Jun →
anubis11–130.0422%28 Jun →
anubis13–50.0117%28 Jun →
dust24–13-0.039%28 Jun →
inferno15–15-0.0424%28 Jun →
ancient9–130.0323%28 Jun →
mirage13–40.006%28 Jun →
overpass13–30.0523%28 Jun →
mirage13–60.0426%10 Jun →
mirage0–13-0.0623%10 Jun →
inferno15–15-0.0326%10 Jun →
overpass13–6-0.0521%10 Jun →
overpass1–9-0.0429%10 Jun →
dust20–13-0.050%10 Jun →
inferno19–150.0616%10 Jun →
overpass13–8-0.0115%10 Jun →
overpass15–150.0426%10 Jun →
anubis8–130.0220%9 Jun →
inferno13–80.0112%4 Jun →
mirage13–2-0.020%4 Jun →
inferno10–130.0321%10 May →
cache13–9-0.0319%9 May →
cache13–50.1019%9 May →
nuke13–60.0821%9 May →
mirage9–13-0.0224%9 May →
ancient11–50.0022%2 May →
overpass0–13-0.0657%2 May →
mirage7–13-0.049%2 May →
mirage13–10-0.0134%2 May →
dust28–13-0.0016%2 May →
ancient13–20.0529%2 May →
ancient13–10.1228%2 May →
anubis16–14-0.0212%1 May →
cache13–60.0428%1 May →
cache13–40.0335%1 May →
ancient14–16-0.0114%28 Apr →
ancient9–130.0414%28 Apr →
inferno6–130.0128%28 Apr →
dust213–7-0.017%28 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0423%28 Apr →
train13–8-0.0319%28 Apr →
anubis13–4-0.0225%28 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0711%28 Apr →
ancient13–100.0017%28 Apr →
anubis13–30.0114%28 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0426%26 Apr →
cache13–60.1033%26 Apr →
overpass9–130.0126%25 Apr →
anubis16–120.0118%25 Apr →
inferno12–12-0.0214%25 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0217%25 Apr →
overpass13–4-0.0118%25 Apr →
inferno9–130.0219%25 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.