Deacon♿

Deacon♿ — CS2 Stats

DK76561198061955192[U:1:101689464]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,163Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,875Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#57448 of 257865 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,875 -1,098 13 Jun – 11 Oct · 22 days played
20,10923,886peak 23,88613 Jun11 Oct
24,185Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-06-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,011 below peak (23,886)
  • +46 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,125 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDeacon♿PREMIER21,875 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning64
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLWWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.2
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.4
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time534ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 23 Jul →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · nuke, 11 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 9 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 16 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 20anubisWeakest map · 35% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2819–968%0.03
anubisC238–1535%0.01
nukeS2014–670%0.03
ancientC177–1041%0.04
dust2—42–250%0.03
cache—40–40%-0.03
overpass—42–250%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

24Matches
58%Win rate
1.73Avg K/D
89.3ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno475%1.4419.3
Nuke333%1.3817.7
Ancient10%1.3320.0
Dust21100%5.0025.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
532msReaction time
22.9%T opening success
64.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
10.19HE damage / grenade
6.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.9096% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0616%11 Oct →
nuke13–40.0513%11 Oct →
inferno13–100.0135%11 Oct →
nuke13–50.0319%6 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0217%6 Sept →
dust213–30.1415%6 Sept →
inferno13–50.0614%6 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0813%30 Aug →
anubis5–130.0329%30 Aug →
inferno13–50.0716%30 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0110%26 Aug →
nuke10–20.0136%26 Aug →
inferno16–130.0215%26 Aug →
ancient11–130.0124%16 Aug →
nuke13–10.0926%16 Aug →
ancient11–130.0219%16 Aug →
inferno13–40.1629%16 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0613%13 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0425%13 Aug →
ancient5–130.0617%13 Aug →
nuke13–10.1240%11 Aug →
nuke13–110.0228%11 Aug →
inferno8–130.0315%11 Aug →
nuke9–130.0215%11 Aug →
inferno15–150.0725%10 Aug →
anubis16–120.0719%10 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0016%6 Aug →
anubis13–70.0113%6 Aug →
inferno13–90.0617%6 Aug →
nuke13–30.0914%6 Aug →
inferno13–40.0516%4 Aug →
cache10–13-0.016%4 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.028%4 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.039%3 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0122%3 Aug →
ancient13–60.1119%2 Aug →
dust213–20.030%2 Aug →
ancient13–100.1421%2 Aug →
anubis13–1-0.0117%2 Aug →
nuke13–50.0017%2 Aug →
inferno13–110.1328%2 Aug →
ancient13–30.0616%2 Aug →
inferno13–50.0326%26 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0019%26 Jul →
anubis11–130.0210%26 Jul →
inferno13–60.0423%26 Jul →
dust211–130.0423%23 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0829%23 Jul →
inferno13–60.2328%23 Jul →
anubis5–130.0318%23 Jul →
ancient9–130.0719%20 Jul →
anubis13–40.098%20 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0539%20 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0515%20 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.049%14 Jul →
inferno13–110.0322%14 Jul →
ancient11–130.0324%14 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0116%14 Jul →
cache4–130.0421%12 Jul →
ancient11–130.0126%12 Jul →
ancient6–130.0228%12 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0124%12 Jul →
nuke13–80.0626%9 Jul →
cache0–13-0.084%9 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0129%9 Jul →
inferno13–100.0328%9 Jul →
ancient13–40.0916%5 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0729%5 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0140%5 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0423%5 Jul →
dust20–13-0.0912%2 Jul →
ancient13–100.0822%2 Jul →
overpass8–13-0.0528%2 Jul →
inferno7–130.0725%2 Jul →
nuke15–150.0216%28 Jun →
overpass10–130.0619%28 Jun →
inferno13–60.0527%28 Jun →
anubis13–110.0428%25 Jun →
inferno1–13-0.1022%25 Jun →
overpass13–40.066%25 Jun →
ancient13–30.0722%25 Jun →
inferno10–130.0125%24 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0014%24 Jun →
inferno11–130.0813%21 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0332%21 Jun →
nuke13–90.0125%21 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0118%20 Jun →
inferno13–100.0517%20 Jun →
anubis13–70.0314%20 Jun →
overpass13–100.0321%20 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0813%18 Jun →
nuke13–20.0119%18 Jun →
anubis16–140.0413%18 Jun →
nuke13–20.1235%18 Jun →
anubis7–130.0227%16 Jun →
anubis1–130.0231%16 Jun →
anubis13–100.0330%13 Jun →
nuke13–110.0516%13 Jun →
ancient13–100.0111%13 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0312%13 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.