pegin

pegin — CS2 Stats

76561198061170193[U:1:100904465]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,056Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,700 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,056 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 28 Feb 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,700 +0 30 Aug18 Sept · 3 observations
2,7002,700peak 2,70030 Aug18 Sept
2,700Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2024-02-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,700
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 300 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpeginFACEITLevel 10 · 2,700 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,700csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning49
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60391Last 10060%Win rateWWLWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time564ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 2 Mar
38%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · nuke, 12 Apr
398msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · nuke, 5 Apr
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 25 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 33nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS3324973%0.02
ancientB24131154%0.01
anubisA148657%0.00
dust2A116555%0.02
nukeD82625%-0.02
infernoS64267%0.02
overpass32167%0.07
cache110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,045Matches
58%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
85.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage103254%1.2517.2
Dust249358%1.2016.1
Ancient33259%1.2316.4
Nuke27266%1.3516.4
Anubis24757%1.3716.3
Inferno5374%1.3817.5
Overpass3168%1.5218.2
Vertigo1662%1.7317.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
570msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
8.28HE damage / grenade
11.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.7561% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–50.0715%18 Sept
mirage13–70.0414%3 Sept
dust27–130.0026%1 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0018%1 Sept
cache13–100.0221%6 Aug
dust213–10-0.0013%5 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0311%4 Aug
mirage13–00.0817%25 Apr
dust23–13-0.0632%18 Apr
nuke13–160.0017%5 Apr
dust29–13-0.0430%5 Apr
mirage13–110.0228%5 Apr
dust213–30.0322%5 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0118%5 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0414%5 Apr
dust211–13-0.0414%5 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0411%4 Apr
dust213–30.1021%4 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0617%4 Apr
mirage11–130.0111%19 Feb
mirage13–90.0220%16 Jan
mirage6–130.0115%29 Dec
mirage16–140.0313%16 Dec
mirage13–70.0612%2 Dec
mirage13–50.0116%10 Oct
mirage13–100.0522%30 Aug
dust215–190.0428%1 Aug
overpass7–130.1425%28 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0728%18 Jul
mirage13–110.0216%12 Jul
mirage13–60.0815%29 Jun
inferno15–150.0221%22 Mar
ancient13–90.0217%17 Feb
dust213–60.0616%21 Sept
mirage13–70.0115%26 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0510%30 Apr
mirage10–130.0026%30 Apr
dust213–50.0516%28 Apr
mirage13–110.0327%27 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0926%15 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0419%15 Apr
nuke13–16-0.0623%13 Apr
nuke1–13-0.0938%12 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0020%12 Apr
anubis4–130.0220%3 Apr
ancient14–160.0511%3 Apr
mirage13–2-0.0218%1 Apr
nuke16–190.0120%5 Mar
overpass13–8-0.0013%5 Mar
ancient13–70.0510%5 Mar
nuke13–30.0320%3 Mar
ancient16–130.0416%3 Mar
inferno7–130.0414%3 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0917%3 Mar
ancient13–60.1018%3 Mar
anubis13–8-0.0015%3 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0613%3 Mar
ancient14–110.0214%3 Mar
anubis13–30.1618%2 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0420%2 Mar
inferno13–40.1113%2 Mar
ancient14–160.019%2 Mar
inferno13–9-0.037%2 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0320%2 Mar
ancient13–60.1617%2 Mar
ancient13–60.1217%2 Mar
ancient12–16-0.048%2 Mar
mirage13–80.1016%1 Mar
anubis10–130.0318%1 Mar
mirage13–40.0417%1 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0616%1 Mar
anubis11–13-0.048%1 Mar
mirage13–70.0211%1 Mar
ancient3–13-0.1025%1 Mar
ancient13–00.0216%1 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0615%1 Mar
ancient6–130.0033%1 Mar
anubis13–80.0516%1 Mar
ancient11–130.0729%29 Feb
anubis12–130.047%29 Feb
anubis13–110.0619%29 Feb
ancient13–30.0921%29 Feb
ancient13–4-0.007%29 Feb
nuke13–60.0321%29 Feb
mirage13–110.0633%29 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0217%29 Feb
mirage13–40.0734%29 Feb
ancient19–170.0510%29 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0710%29 Feb
ancient25–22-0.0213%28 Feb
overpass13–50.0617%28 Feb
mirage13–2-0.0217%28 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0314%28 Feb
anubis13–90.0128%28 Feb
mirage13–60.0620%28 Feb
mirage7–130.0533%28 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0426%28 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0925%28 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0511%28 Feb
mirage13–90.0416%28 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →