Moose

Moose — CS2 Stats

AU76561198059489343[U:1:99223615]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,047Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,861Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2Tracked matches · now 1,047
−3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 46.7%

Rating over time

35Days played since 2026-07-24

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches8——
Win rate38%——
K/D1.14——
Headshot %47%——

Measured 8 Sep 2026 → 9 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate39.5%48.2%50.9%11.4% short
Shot accuracy12.4%13.3%13.7%1.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.081.071.09meets
Match win rate43.7%46.9%48.4%4.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMooseFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning59
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateLLWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 454ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.7
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.9
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time482ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 485ms → last ⅓ avg 482ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 6 Sept →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · cache, 2 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 2 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 29 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3216–1650%-0.00
infernoB178–947%0.02
cacheB178–947%0.02
anubisB157–847%0.00
dust2D93–633%-0.04
ancientA53–260%-0.03
nuke—43–175%0.06
shelter—11–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

75,379Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
3,238Matches
43.7%Match win rate
39.5%Headshot %
12.4%Shot accuracy
8,849MVPs
1,401Hours (in match)
3,761Bombs planted
1,464Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,992inferno
5,678dust2
1,634nuke
958train
890cbble
646vertigo
124office
61lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

446Matches
49%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
81.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13354%0.9614.8
Anubis7145%0.9213.6
Inferno6943%0.9914.5
Nuke3450%0.9213.8
Cache3456%1.1517.9
Vertigo1947%1.0115.9
Ancient1968%0.9013.5
Dust21937%0.8414.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
482msReaction time
36.3%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
10.55HE damage / grenade
10.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2866% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.0711%7 Oct →
inferno8–130.0312%4 Oct →
mirage16–130.0516%10 Sept →
cache5–130.0225%9 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.056%7 Sept →
anubis10–130.0120%7 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0020%7 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0716%6 Sept →
inferno13–50.1923%6 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0016%6 Sept →
nuke13–70.0937%5 Sept →
nuke5–130.1116%4 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0210%4 Sept →
cache13–110.0337%2 Sept →
cache13–110.0222%2 Sept →
inferno11–130.0118%2 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0118%2 Sept →
cache13–60.0516%30 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0216%28 Aug →
anubis13–70.0014%28 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.038%28 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0720%27 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0518%27 Aug →
inferno13–40.0412%27 Aug →
inferno9–130.0116%27 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.113%26 Aug →
anubis13–60.0524%26 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0323%26 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0117%26 Aug →
mirage9–130.0117%26 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0710%25 Aug →
inferno16–140.0717%25 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0313%25 Aug →
mirage13–110.0112%24 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0612%24 Aug →
anubis13–80.0112%24 Aug →
inferno8–130.0215%20 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0315%20 Aug →
mirage13–160.0120%20 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0218%20 Aug →
mirage5–130.0010%20 Aug →
mirage13–70.0117%19 Aug →
cache8–13-0.085%19 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0313%17 Aug →
mirage13–90.0115%17 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0119%14 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0017%14 Aug →
anubis13–100.0311%14 Aug →
mirage13–100.0111%11 Aug →
mirage13–90.0414%11 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0812%10 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0810%8 Aug →
mirage19–22-0.0110%8 Aug →
mirage13–50.0418%8 Aug →
anubis13–60.0110%8 Aug →
shelter13–11-0.0014%7 Aug →
nuke13–70.0414%7 Aug →
mirage8–130.0113%6 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0218%6 Aug →
cache10–13-0.019%5 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0222%5 Aug →
dust210–13-0.027%5 Aug →
cache11–130.019%5 Aug →
cache13–100.1416%4 Aug →
dust213–8-0.027%4 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0411%3 Aug →
nuke13–50.005%3 Aug →
inferno13–50.0614%3 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0216%2 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0116%2 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0217%30 Jul →
inferno13–90.0722%30 Jul →
dust213–3-0.0215%30 Jul →
anubis6–130.0611%30 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0119%30 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.038%30 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.130%29 Jul →
mirage13–20.049%29 Jul →
cache13–90.0615%28 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0415%28 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0112%28 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0210%28 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0113%28 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.082%27 Jul →
ancient13–80.017%27 Jul →
mirage13–70.0619%26 Jul →
inferno13–70.078%26 Jul →
cache13–70.0917%26 Jul →
mirage13–60.0926%25 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.025%25 Jul →
mirage13–40.058%25 Jul →
mirage17–19-0.0111%25 Jul →
cache13–40.0110%25 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0214%25 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0213%25 Jul →
anubis13–40.022%25 Jul →
inferno13–80.0116%25 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0314%24 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0216%24 Jul →
anubis13–20.0615%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.