Movetaho

Movetaho — CS2 Stats

FI76561198057726410[U:1:97460682]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

522Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,245Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#97147 of 238272 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+11Tracked matches · now 522
−13.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 33.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 28 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,532 +0 5 Aug17 Sept · 3 days played
18,53218,532peak 18,5325 Aug17 Sept
18,532Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-07-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches103+7
Win rate40%100%−60pp
K/D0.891.04−0.15
Headshot %46%44%+2pp

Measured 17 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; previous 9 Sep 2026 → 17 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,860), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.7%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy17.7%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.251.061.07above
Match win rate94.4%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMovetahoFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning54
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateLLLWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility3.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.4
Utility3.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time554ms−100ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 29 Aug
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · cache, 14 Aug
313msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 19 Aug
13–1Biggest win · cache, 14 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
104In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB23121152%-0.01
nukeB157847%-0.02
cacheA159660%-0.00
ancientC156940%-0.00
dust2S128467%0.01
infernoA95456%-0.02
anubisD82625%-0.02
vertigo31233%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,778Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
18,314Matches
94.4%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 8 players
52.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
17.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
5,204MVPs
692Hours (in match)
1,675Bombs planted
364Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,539inferno
1,436nuke
1,292dust2
813train
597cbble
471vertigo
105lake
15safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

406Matches
52%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
79.1ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7348%1.0515.2
Nuke5853%1.0215.3
Ancient4751%1.0215.5
Anubis4347%1.0216.6
Cache3456%1.1016.1
Dust23456%1.2117.6
Inferno2361%1.0114.5
Vertigo425%1.1716.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
564msReaction time
40.9%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
5.91HE damage / grenade
7.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–13-0.0425%22 Sept
cache4–130.0219%22 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0118%22 Sept
dust216–130.0110%22 Sept
cache4–13-0.079%21 Sept
dust213–9-0.0216%21 Sept
ancient13–160.0117%21 Sept
mirage13–90.0123%21 Sept
nuke7–13-0.057%21 Sept
dust213–9-0.0222%21 Sept
mirage14–160.0017%21 Sept
nuke17–19-0.0420%8 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0718%8 Sept
dust24–13-0.0321%8 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0630%8 Sept
cache5–13-0.0218%29 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0422%29 Aug
mirage13–80.1025%29 Aug
cache13–80.039%20 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0418%19 Aug
cache14–16-0.0412%18 Aug
inferno7–130.0015%18 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0713%17 Aug
ancient16–190.0116%17 Aug
dust213–40.0319%17 Aug
cache7–13-0.0810%17 Aug
nuke12–160.0031%16 Aug
cache13–30.0419%16 Aug
cache13–3-0.0014%16 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0210%16 Aug
anubis19–160.0413%16 Aug
ancient10–130.0312%16 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0717%16 Aug
cache13–60.0113%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0318%16 Aug
inferno13–6-0.057%16 Aug
nuke13–90.0530%16 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0521%16 Aug
inferno13–50.0413%14 Aug
cache13–10.0537%14 Aug
ancient13–110.0324%14 Aug
dust210–13-0.0024%14 Aug
mirage13–70.0516%14 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0722%14 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0319%14 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0226%14 Aug
mirage13–30.0212%14 Aug
mirage18–22-0.0021%13 Aug
ancient13–40.0413%13 Aug
nuke13–80.0215%13 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0213%13 Aug
vertigo9–130.0721%13 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0215%12 Aug
mirage13–100.1017%12 Aug
ancient10–130.0113%7 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0020%7 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0914%6 Aug
mirage10–130.0226%6 Aug
vertigo13–60.0221%6 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0117%6 Aug
dust213–110.0622%6 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0523%6 Aug
mirage13–100.0416%6 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0222%6 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0622%6 Aug
anubis5–130.0014%5 Aug
dust213–40.0921%5 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0113%5 Aug
inferno16–120.0012%5 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0114%4 Aug
cache9–13-0.0714%2 Aug
inferno13–80.0020%2 Aug
ancient13–100.0313%2 Aug
ancient13–40.0824%2 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0315%2 Aug
cache13–80.0717%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.079%1 Aug
dust29–13-0.0120%1 Aug
cache16–130.026%1 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0727%31 Jul
dust213–2-0.0130%31 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1421%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0112%30 Jul
nuke16–140.0318%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0521%30 Jul
dust213–80.0317%30 Jul
mirage13–30.0214%30 Jul
anubis12–160.0410%30 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0110%30 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0621%29 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0613%29 Jul
nuke19–17-0.0213%29 Jul
mirage13–110.0228%28 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0010%28 Jul
cache16–130.0120%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0315%28 Jul
dust23–13-0.0429%28 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0410%28 Jul
cache10–4-0.0223%28 Jul
mirage13–10.0218%28 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →